[jira] [Created] (ARROW-1779) [Java] Integration test breaks without zeroing out validity vectors

2017-11-07 Thread Li Jin (JIRA)
Li Jin created ARROW-1779: - Summary: [Java] Integration test breaks without zeroing out validity vectors Key: ARROW-1779 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1779 Project: Apache Arrow I

[jira] [Created] (ARROW-1778) Python: Link parquet-cpp statically, privately in manylinux1 wheels

2017-11-07 Thread Uwe L. Korn (JIRA)
Uwe L. Korn created ARROW-1778: -- Summary: Python: Link parquet-cpp statically, privately in manylinux1 wheels Key: ARROW-1778 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1778 Project: Apache Arrow

[jira] [Created] (ARROW-1777) [C++] Add static ctor ArrayData::Make for nicer syntax in places

2017-11-07 Thread Wes McKinney (JIRA)
Wes McKinney created ARROW-1777: --- Summary: [C++] Add static ctor ArrayData::Make for nicer syntax in places Key: ARROW-1777 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1777 Project: Apache Arrow

Re: JDBC Adapter for Apache-Arrow

2017-11-07 Thread Julian Hyde
I have logged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2040 (I logged it within Calcite because this makes more sense that this is an Arrow adapter within Calcite than a Calcite adapter within Arrow). Note the last paragraph about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2025 and bioinfo

RE: JDBC Adapter for Apache-Arrow

2017-11-07 Thread Atul Dambalkar
Hi, Don' t mean to interrupt the current discussion threads. But, based on the discussions so far on the JDBC Adapter piece, are we in a position to create a JIRA ticket for this as well as the other piece about adding a direct Arrow objects creation support from JDBC drivers? If yes, I can cer

[jira] [Created] (ARROW-1776) [C++[ arrow::gpu::CudaContext::bytes_allocated() isn't defined

2017-11-07 Thread Kouhei Sutou (JIRA)
Kouhei Sutou created ARROW-1776: --- Summary: [C++[ arrow::gpu::CudaContext::bytes_allocated() isn't defined Key: ARROW-1776 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1776 Project: Apache Arrow

Re: Arrow 0.8.0 release timeline

2017-11-07 Thread Uwe L. Korn
+1, the timeline sounds good. I will try to pick some of the lingering tickets on the Python/C++ side. Uwe On Mon, Nov 6, 2017, at 11:17 PM, Li Jin wrote: > +1. > > I think this is a reasonable target time line for Java refactoring. > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Wes McKinney > wrote: