Re: regular arrow sync up

2016-08-16 Thread Wes McKinney
+1. If there is demand for an Asia-friendly time we can change things up from week to week. > On Aug 16, 2016, at 10:52 AM, Jacques Nadeau wrote: > > sounds good > >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote: >> >> Based on the feedback I'm proposing Thursday Aug 18 at 4PM UTC

Re: regular arrow sync up

2016-08-16 Thread Jacques Nadeau
sounds good On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote: > Based on the feedback I'm proposing Thursday Aug 18 at 4PM UTC as the first > Arrow sync. > That's: > - 9AM PDT (San Francisco) > - 12PM EDT (New York) > - 5PM CET (London) > - 6PM CEST (Paris, Berlin) > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 a

Re: regular arrow sync up

2016-08-16 Thread Julien Le Dem
Based on the feedback I'm proposing Thursday Aug 18 at 4PM UTC as the first Arrow sync. That's: - 9AM PDT (San Francisco) - 12PM EDT (New York) - 5PM CET (London) - 6PM CEST (Paris, Berlin) On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Uwe L. Korn wrote: > +1 for bi-weekly and europeen friendly times: CET (GM

Re: Discussion: Should we make string/binary types first class Arrow Array types?

2016-08-16 Thread Wes McKinney
See ARROW-262 On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: > These IPC details we should definitely document outside of the code. > > For the String/Binary type question, I want to start a document that > explains the logical data types in Message.fbs in terms of > > - what Arrow memory