Not sure about the “closing stale” for now, because many of our repo does
contain good issues and PRs which are idle without any action, we should
first look into those issues and PRs and resolve them. IMO
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 11:13 AM, Ayush das wrote:
> I think github bot integration good be
I think github bot integration good be a great step.
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 11:08 AM, Shuyang Wu wrote:
> These days, more and more Apache repositories are using GitHub Bot to
> improve their community experience for both contributors and reviewers, for
> example, by automatically adding labels
What about adding the automatic closing stale issue?
Best regards
Chao Zhang
https://github.com/tokers
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 1:38 PM Shuyang Wu wrote:
>
> These days, more and more Apache repositories are using GitHub Bot to
> improve their community experience for both contributors and revie
These days, more and more Apache repositories are using GitHub Bot to
improve their community experience for both contributors and reviewers, for
example, by automatically adding labels and make interaction to PR.
(several bot status of apache repos listed in [1])
Due to Apache's rule, we could g
Great idea ~
I think recording all non-2xx requests and provide a similar header of
x-upstream-status is better.
fukiki 于2021年4月6日周二 上午11:23写道：
> Hi, All:
>
> I am sending the email for further discussion: Distinguish the source
> (upstream or apisix) of all the status code, under the control of
+1 Approve
I Checked:
1. All links are valid.
2. Shasum and signature are OK.
3. LICENSE and NOTICE are OK.
4. Apisix-dashboard can be build and run correctly on Ubuntu 20.04.
Zhiyuan Ju 于2021年4月20日周二 下午11:27写道：
> +1 binding
>
> Hi, I just checked:
>
> - Links are valid;
> - Signature & shasum
