The reason for the apisix startup script use `lua` as the interpreter is we
don't know the path of LuaJIT in user's environment.
Sure you can change the interpreter to LuaJIT in your own production
environment.
Thanks,
Ming Wen, Apache APISIX
Twitter: _WenMing
liyong 于2019年11月27日周三 下午12:05写道：
You can try `make deps`, which will install deps in apisix's directory.
Thanks,
Ming Wen, Apache APISIX
Twitter: _WenMing
liyong 于2019年11月21日周四 上午10:43写道：
> The Makefile has already give a recommended way for install dependencies by
> using luarock 3 with the --lua-dir option specified to Open
Currently luarocks 3( latest version 3.2.1) and build with OpenResty
luajit, the apisix startup script currently use `#!/usr/bin/env lua` as its
interpreter, it also support luajit bundled with OpenResty, so I thought we
can only depend OpenResty in production environment, does anyone else has
some
Sorry for my late Congrats. :)
Juan Pan
panj...@apache.org
Juan Pan(Trista), Apache ShardingSphere
On 11/25/2019 13:17，Ming Wen wrote：
Hi all,
The Apache APISIX (incubating) community is glad to announce that Apache
APISIX(incubating) 0.9 has been released! This is our first Apache release.
Yeah, we can make it read only as an archive.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 7:05 PM Lang Wang wrote:
>
> 'Make it archive' +1
>
> Zhiyuan Ju 于2019年11月26日周二 下午5:48写道：
>
> > I would prefer archiving it.
> >
> > Ming Wen 于 2019年11月26日周二 15:56写道：
> >
>
'Make it archive' +1
Zhiyuan Ju 于2019年11月26日周二 下午5:48写道：
> I would prefer archiving it.
>
> Ming Wen 于 2019年11月26日周二 15:56写道：
>
> > hello, community
> >
> > The dashborad-built repository[1] stores the compiled code. They cannot
> be
> > handled well about licenses, so they are not included in
I would prefer archiving it.
Ming Wen 于 2019年11月26日周二 15:56写道：
> hello, community
>
> The dashborad-built repository[1] stores the compiled code. They cannot be
> handled well about licenses, so they are not included in the release
> version of Apache APISIX.
>
> So, does this repo no longer nee
