[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX (Incubating) 0.9-RC1

2019-11-19 Thread Ming Wen
Hello Apache APISIX community, I am happy to announce that the vote on release Apache APISIX(Incubating) 0.9-RC1 has PASSED. Here is the vote result: 13 +1 votes 0+/-0 votes 0-1 votes 3 mentor +1 votes: - Justin Mclean - Willem Jiang - Kevin Ratnasekera 9 PPMC +1 votes: - Zhiyuan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX (Incubating) 0.9-RC1 ROUND 2

2019-11-19 Thread Willem Jiang
+1 (binding) I checked below items, they are good to me. [X] Download links are valid. [X] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [X] DISCLAIMER is included. [X] LICENSE and NOTICE files are good. [X] No binary file in the source kit. [X] All files have license headers if necessary. Willem Jiang

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX (Incubating) 0.9-RC1 ROUND 2

2019-11-19 Thread liyong
+1 ( binding ) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes fine - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - no unexpected binary files in release - all source file have ASF headers - compiled and ran QuickStart on macOS I checked: - Download links are valid. - Checksums and PGP si

Re: [DISCUSS] When will we support fill in domain to nodeX when adding an upstream?

2019-11-19 Thread Lang Wang
We use a java app called be-index-search-service which runs on k8s, its service name: ➜ ~ kbg svc -n beta | grep -i index be-index-search-service NodePort 172.19.0.112 8080:31777/TCP 54d Within k8s cluster i can access this service only by typing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX (Incubating) 0.9-RC1 ROUND 2

2019-11-19 Thread Lang Wang
+1 (binding) I check those: [Y] Download links are valid. [Y] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [Y] DISCLAIMER is included. [Y] LICENSE and NOTICE files are good. [Y] No binary file. [Y] All files have license headers if necessary. It works fine on (docker) alpine 3.7, with: luarocks: 3.2.

Re: [DISCUSS] When will we support fill in domain to nodeX when adding an upstream?

2019-11-19 Thread YuanSheng Wang
Hi: Can you supply an example? I am confused with your question. On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 3:27 PM Lang Wang wrote: > Hi devs, > > In the k8s service scenario, an upstream maybe like > *$SVC.$NS.svc.cluster.local:$PORT, *and the service's ip is None when we > set it's type to ClusterIP:None. >