i wait for a reply!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the
e-mail adresses masked instead of removed. (27177)
Kind regards, Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the LICENSE file. (I will
revert those).
The reference to the license in the source file header is not part of
the license itself, it is a reference to the applicable license, which
is available at https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
br Martijn
Op 27-5-2019 om 19:19 schreef Stefan
Hi all
I went through the wiki and made sure that the entire page tree from
home was migrated - except for "personal" pages. Note that some pages
weren't automatically migrated, I have migrated those manually.
Br Martijn
Op 30-5-2019 om 11:55 schreef Stefan Bodewig:
Hi
Furthermore I cleaned up somewhat, restoring some kind of structure.
Some page I did not see where they were in the structure I moved to
Orphaned, the People pages are all under People pages, as far as I am
concerned these could be deleted.
One spammy kind of page I did remove.
Br Martijn
Hi,
yes indeed, fork true, executable pointing to jdk 11, ant running on top
of jdk 8. I do intend to have a look at that.
Br Martijn
Op 25-8-2019 om 14:00 schreef Jaikiran Pai:
Thank you Martijn, your commit does indeed fixes the issues I was
running into.
On 25/08/19 3:18 PM, Martijn
Hi,
Can it be that public CVS is currently down?
I seem to not be able to do updats / create patches anymore.
Kind Regards, Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could please @since 1.6 tags be added to the code?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Isn't there a danger in using a non-synchronized class ?
Otherwise I can gladly switch to ArrayList.
Antoine
There are wrappers for that (Collections.synchronizedXXX(XXX xxx)
XXX = Collection , List, Map, Set, SortedMap or SortedSet.
So that should not be an issue. (That
Hi, in that case please also apply :
Index: docs/manual/CoreTypes/permissions.html
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes/permissions.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 permissions.html
--- docs/manual/CoreTy
+1
Martijn
Matt Benson schreef:
I'd like to create one. Any objections?
-Matt
Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/sear
+1
Martijn
Kevin Jackson schreef:
+1 deprecate for 1.7.1 if no-one dissents
Kev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yes - move the weblogic and starteam tasks to antlibs. [ ]
No - keep them in ant 1.8.0 [ ]
My vote is for Yes [X]
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
+1 Martijn
Peter Reilly wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose Ben Burgess as a committer
for the ant project, with a special interest in maintaining
the starteam tasks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Kevin Jackson wrote:
Hi all,
It's time to get a bug-fix release out, and again today we're getting
messages from the user list asking for 1.7.1.
I volunteer to be release manager (but would like an experienced hand
to back me up procedurally and with svn branching etc).
accepting. But maybe thoughts change ...
I'll start with +1
Jan
+1 Martijn
[1] http://marc.info/?l=ivy-dev&m=119078926811557&w=2
[2] http://marc.info/?l=ant-dev&m=116118082522301&w=2
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Please review, I was not able to test it today.
(the { in the while clause is on a separate line because it would break
the 80 char limit)
Martijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
Author: jkf
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:07:17 2007
New Revision: 581055
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=581055&
oth ivy and ant)
ant-dev (development discussion on both ivy and ant)
ant-user (as-is for the users)
ivy-user (as-is for the users)
br Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xavier Hanin schreef:
On 10/12/07, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
maybe we could create the following lists
ant-bugs (gump, bugzilla, (what bug platform is ivy on?))
ant-commits (svn commits from
veryone in the community can
have his or her specific points of intrest and be more active in one
part or the other, but we still are one development community.
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
explicit initial checkout. If not, I'll add it.
(The script)
#!/bin/tcsh
cd /www/ant.apache.org
/usr/local/bin/svn up | /usr/bin/grep -v "At revision"
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addi
Kevin Jackson schreef:
Tell me how to merge stuff in SVN and I will try!
I just copied'n'pasted :( apparently svn 1.5 will have easier merging
than currently[1]
http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79
I've been playing with git recently and I'm very very impressed by
it's performance - c
whatever else may come up in the future)?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 Martijn
-
To
Stefan Bodewig schreef:
Hi,
it seemed as if the discussion favored a joined mailing lists of Anf
(and antlibs) and Ivy, so here is the formal vote.
Should we merge [EMAIL PROTECTED] into [EMAIL PROTECTED] and likewise
[EMAIL PROTECTED] into the new [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefan
+1 Martijn
cases.
results: http://kruithof.xs4all.nl/ant/ant-trunk-14
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
);
}
}
I hope you noticed that this is not an equivalent change, not just
starting to accepting "false" interrupts, but also to ignore the timeout.
to do it correctly probably it should be using something using
currentTimeMillis as well.
7;s 5 slashes) before it opens an share
file:// is the base
/ represents root
and // reprensents the start of the share
It won't settle for more or less slashes.
I still have to test under java uri handling
Martijn
-
To uns
To
Recently I have put some effort to remove ignoring thread.interrupt from
all kinds of (endless) loops. Interrupting a few times (as other parts
may also wait in order to neatly close resources) should now stop ant.
Martijn
Darin Swanson schreef:
Eclipse is pretty similar to #1.
We
page in between.
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefan Bodewig schreef:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This was already discussed, but the conclusion was not clear.
Do we migrate https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy
I thought this was already dec
+1 Martijn
-Original Message-
From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: jeudi 6 décembre 2007 7:34
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.0.0-beta1 (second attempt)
I have built a new release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta1
You can download it from this URL:
http
have changed the solution to be backward
compatible on the FileUtils. The createTempFileName method has been
removed and a parameter has been added to the createTempFile method.
Martijn
Petar Tahchiev schreef:
Hi guys,
here is Petar Tahchiev from the Jakarta Cactus Team. I found that the
Hi
could you please file a bugreport as enhancement wich includes your patch.
br Martijn
s p schreef:
Hi,
I've just created a patch for the Ant source code repository which will introduce the possibility to link to external log files from generated JUnit test reports.
Our tests d
+1
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 on the plan / releasing a beta
Martijn
Kevin Jackson schreef:
Hi,
As I mentioned previously (although I'm a couple of days late).
I'd like to release a beta of 1.7.1 within the next two weeks.
The current 1.7.1 trunk is now locked for further changes (99.9% test
completion o
inquiries please via the ant developers list.
br Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Martijn
Kevin Jackson schreef:
Hi all,
I think it's time to go ahead and push out 1.7.1 for wider testing.
I really *don't* want to add any changes to code at the moment, but if
there are any documentation issues that someone notices I'm willing to
let them in on a cas
Ok
+1
Martijn
Kevin Jackson schreef:
Hi,
I've been informed (on the q.t) that I never actually requested a vote
before announcing that the ant 1.7.1 beta tarballs were available.
So officially at the moment, the tarballs on people.apache.org that I
announced are beta-in-potentia
ve not been into ivy(ide) (yet) and currently heavily constrained on
time (new job)
hope to pick up some ant work again, as soon as the release of ant is done.
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional co
yes [x] (+1)
no [ ]
I performed some basic checks, here is my +1
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
006 June, 2011 June, 2016 June, 2021 15 years
br Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 for 1.8 / main
doubting if it is a good idea for 1.7.x if we would make another one.
Martijn
Stefan Bodewig schreef:
This is not that much based on features available (although I consider
using NIO in StreamPumper) but more on "where do we test".
The vote is simple. If you vo
.String.(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.String.valueOf(Unknown Source)
at Test.main(Test.java:6)
br Martijn
Matt Benson schreef:
I always thought String.valueOf(null) returned "null".
Was I on crack?
-Matt
P.S. Good to see you committing, Martijn...
--- j...@apache.o
Seems like an maven error on an 3rd party component with instructions to
install yet another 3rd party component.
Please contact either the maven or the clearantlib user list (that if
the error persists after installing checkstyle)
br Martijn
meher03 schreef:
Hi , I am getting the following
d together with ant 1.8 (as in 1.7 starteam is still
part of the core)
br Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
+1 from me too, Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Peter Reilly wrote:
Vote:
yes this is a good thing for 1.7 [ ]
no, let us stabilize 1.7[ X]
Please let us get 1.7 first,
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
Sorry no .net environment present here,
so +1 but not the possibiltity to test here.
Martijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
apache-ant-dotnet-0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
- /LICENSE:190: * Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]
No year, no copyright owner?
(same inside the jar)
- version
+1
Martijn
Peter Reilly wrote:
+1
Peter
On 9/10/06, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Conor
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to build a second beta on Sunday, September 17th
>
> the tag in Subversion would be : ANT_170_B2
> the
Peter Reilly wrote:
Hi, I started a thead last week that did not end in a conclusion.
should we defer resolving references until runtime:
original message
"
Currently in ant, there is two steps in processing
a project build file, a parsing step and an execution
step. In the parsing step a DOM li
defined in tasks that are not run, for example
Such scripts I would consider to be dodgy.
Peter
In that case +1
On 9/29/06, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Reilly wrote:
> Hi, I started a thead last week that did not end in a c
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I propose to build a third beta on Sunday, October 15th
the tag in Subversion would be : ANT_170_B3
the version returned by ant -version would be : ant 1.7.0Beta3
Regards,
Antoine
+1 Martijn
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
Hello Stefan,
did a quick verification of the download of the tar.gz. Works fine,
checked md5 and signature.
By the way, if you svn checkout openpgp from jakarta commons sandbox,
the ant task to gpg sign binary files is here, and you can build it with
mvn install.
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: ant/core/trunk/CONTRIBUTORS
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/ant/core/trunk/CONTRIBUTORS?rev=354209&r1=354208&r2=354209&view=diff
==
Binary files -
+0 Martijn
On 10/29/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've created distribution files for the .NET Antlib and uploaded them
to <http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/dotnet-antlib/> and propose to
release them as 1.0 final.
As described on the release plan
5 based build working towards 1.3 jvm's, I
will NOT start to work on getting it to work on 1.2 as well.
Martijn
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
Hi,
I hit the send button a bit too fast.
I want to ask :
OK to release these files as Ant 1.7.0RC1 on Sunday, November 12th, as
Ant 1.7.0RC1 ?
jdk 1.3.) Definitely the
behaviour should be the same. What is your opinion on the required
behaviour?
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ar to the binary distribution, and supply a
POM file for it.
Yes [X]
No [ ]
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ct.
I have added, and not removed the methods because of backward
compatibility. In my view protected methods are just as public as public
methods (we may have users we do not know of, and they would be
rightfully using it). If they would have been package scoped I would not
have mercy.
M
ee on it, and if we drop support for JDK 1.2, make it official.
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Reilly schreef:
On 11/24/06, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As you might have noticed. about a week ago I wrote about some troubles
on jdk 1.3 which by now are fixed. However I didn't get any reaction on
the fact that the official builds do not work at all for JDK
My experiments where conducted using the official RC1 with 1.2, not by
building and running with 1.2
The official RC1 works (limited) with 1.3 and higher these issues have
been changes, so that a similar build will run successfully on 1.3.
Martijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, test results
ption which was in the previous 1.7 alpha and beta
releases has been removed. It is the default behavior and not needed.
Martijn
Results when trying to run on java 1.2.2 on windows are the same as with
the release candidate:
D:\data\eclipseworkspace\ant-trunk>set JAVA_HOME=c:\java\jdk
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be
present.
I am +1 on releasing those,
we should however documen
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
Hi,
I have not done anything much with antunit yet, but I am also +1.
It is a cool way of testing ant tasks.
Regards,
Antoine
Not only that our testsuite of 1.7.0 final relies on it so definetely +1
here.
Martijn
Original-Nachricht
Datum
Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Benson schreef:
--- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH?
Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining
ourselves from committing to HEAD just before the
release. :) Should we wait on branching until nearer
to 1.7
-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I have installed a cron job on people.apache.org to automatically update
the web site.
Any objections?
Script: /home/jkf/updateweb
#!/bin/tcsh
cd /www/ant.apache.org
/usr/local/bin/svn up | /usr/bin/grep -v "At revision"
crontab:
57 2 * * * /home/jkf/updateweb
Hi
It seems that the nighly builds do not pull the most recent changes
(head) from svn (anymore).
Antoine could you please have a look at what is going on?
Br Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
roposals before tossing a vote.
Martijn
Kevin Jackson schreef:
Hi all,
In an effort to start trimming the deprecated fat from Ant for the
next release, I'd like to propose that the task bin
consigned to the dustbin of history and the docs be updated.
My rational for this:
- personally I
Hi
At least have a look at the status line on top of the log before
searching for errors:
Details
* *State: *Success
* *For: *Project: test-ant-no-xerces
<http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ant/test-ant-no-xerces/index.html>
(passing since 1 run again)
Martijn
A
, but
on purpose. We do not provide an online version of the API docs, they
are included with all our distributions.
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nd of life process.
Martijn
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Steve Loughran wrote:
What is our minium Java version these days? Java 1.3?
IntrospectionHelper has some stuff (EMPTY_MAP) that is only needed for 1.2
support, so if we are on java1.3+, I coul
Steve Loughran schreef:
OK, so we are java1.3+ now. Excellent.
Could we make 1.3+ that (or even 1.4+) make official via a vote?
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
and also be used using jdk 1.2 in that case.
[ ] Yes drop Java 1.2 support altogether as of now
[ ] No do not drop Java 1.2 support altogether as of now
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
I have marked all those bugreps as resolved / invalid, and added the
developers list again, because the guy tried to hide his activity from
us (he did this all on 18-4-2007) .
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
y with Bugzilla
I do not really see the point in switching, JIRA also seems to have its
spam problems.
My stance is -0.
In case the infra team wants us to switch I am +1, but I do not see any
point in switching just for the fun of it.
M
This vote has passed as there were only votes in favour of dropping
support of java 1.2
Martijn
Martijn Kruithof schreef:
Hi
Because the discussion is coming up again, and I would like to have a
clear result, here an official Vote request.
Given the facts that
1) java 1.2 is EOL
2) java
Please verify this with an older (0.1.29) version of jsch or with the
latest Ant (nightly build) before submitting a bugreport.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090
br Martijn
Jean-Noël Rivasseau schreef:
Hi, I posted this on the user list but noone answered, I have better
Hi,
nice work, though this set seems to contain a wrong correction (prefixed
with )
Kind Regards, Martijn
Shatzer, Larry wrote:
Thanks, here is the next set.
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/UnPackageNameMapper.java still has messed
up line endings.
-- Larry
-Original Message
author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Charles Hudak
+ * @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Martijn Kruithof
*
* @since Ant 1.2
*
@@ -96,6 +97,7 @@
private File workingDirectory = null;
private Project project = null;
private boolean newEnvironment = false;
+p
Hi
Well fair enough, it is recognizable as the exit value will in that case
be Integer.MAX_VALUE, so that should not be an issue. (So far for the
non-hardcoded values)
Thanks, Martijn
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
regarding op
Hi,
If you make something like this (I don't see a direct benefit), why not
make uptodate an taskcontainer so that you can wrap any task in there
without the need of indirection via the sequential task.
Kind regards, Martijn.
Paul Mclachlan wrote:
Basically, I've added the capabili
x27;s. Furthermore it may
become lower with future java versions again. When looking at the code
one would not necessarily expect more than one line in the method (empty
constructor). Therefore I had not put the if statement in there.
Kind Regards, Martijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
antoine 2003/10/27 10:
Win XP Home (NL version) passes (test run 5)
including some test on nested ;-)
The org.apache.tools.ant.ProjectTest.testDuplicateTargets fails however
:-( (both on linux (fedora core) and XP / both sun jdk 1.4.2_03)
Peter Reilly wrote:
Hi,
I have added a nested file element to filelist,
used as f
skanthak at muehlheim dot de
slo
Peter
You tried the obvious didn't you?
Kind Regards, Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, just don't know how to test
it yet
(I haven't even verified yet if it compiles!).
Kind Regards, Martijn
Index: org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Expand.java
===
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -r1.53 Expand.java
--- org/apache
Martijn Kruithof wrote:
Hi
Back to the cause analysis of the gc mystery:
It seems to me that expandFile of Expand.java (the class implementing
the unzip task) leaks non
explicitly closed streams, that are very likely to lead to open file
handles from the expandFile
method.
I will verify and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.12 +12 -7 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch/Locator.java
Index: Locator.java
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch/Locator.java,v
retrieving revision 1.11
Hi,
could the patch to bug
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26020 (which would
also fix 27842) please be taken into consideration?
Kind regards, Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
cmd.createArgument().setValue(source);
+}
}
addCurrentCompilerArgs(cmd);
Shouldn't we at least log some kind of warning when we ignore 1.1 or 1.2?
like
attributes.log("Jikes does not support -source " + source + ". Using
ally write
a new file comparison function that has the ability to ignore
differences in line endings and use that one for most test cases.
Kind Regards, Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm... maybe we should just change the unit test to read the files
(using with a filter) into properties
and compare those rather than using FileUtils.contentEquals(...)?
We could also add a FileUtil.conte
Hi,
what are the conditions to merge to ANT_16_BRANCH as sync and not only
to HEAD?
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kev Jackson wrote:
If this is related to MD5 checksums, they've recently been proven to
not be conclusive proof that the content of the file is the same as
the checksum, ie two different files can create the same checksum
under certain conditions.
Yes it is.
Ma
Hi,
this test case would now also pass if no class has been found at all, is
that intentional?
Kind Regards, Martijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
conor 2004/12/22 06:08:23
Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/depend
DependTest.java
Log
might be made by subclasses of
Copy. I did take into account that the derived class of Copy might have
provided an own/other implementation of FileUtils. (Though I would have
liked to ignore this).
Kind Regards, Martijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jkf 2005/01/04 12:20:52
Modified:src/main
Regards, Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I understand the importance of improving the style, but shouldn't we
prefer no comments (warnings stay to indicate they are missing)
over this kind of comments:
Kind Regards, Martijn
+ * @param file a File value
+ * @param algorithm a String value
+ * @param provider a S
1 - 100 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
