Looking to contribute

2015-07-15 Thread Jaikiran Pai
tions? I couldn't find this in any document that I read (I can send a patch to the docs itself when I know the answer). -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-m

Re: Looking to contribute

2015-07-16 Thread Jaikiran Pai
uld be usable, right? -Jaikiran On Thursday 16 July 2015 05:38 PM, Jean-Louis Boudart wrote: The best you can do to help us would be to try to submit patches either via JIRA attachemnet or via pull requests. Let me know if you need some more informations. 2015-07-16 14:06 GMT+02:00 Jean-

Re: Looking to contribute

2015-07-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Thank you Nicolas. I just submitted the first pull request which fixes IVY-1526 https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/7. Let me know if that's good enough or requires more changes. -Jaikiran On Thursday 16 July 2015 05:57 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: Le 16 juil. 2015 à 14:14, Jaikiran P

Re: Looking to contribute

2015-07-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
n which allows setting the default branch. Admins can edit it to set a branch of their choice as default. I think that needs to be done on this repo. -Jaikiran : https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/blob/master/build.properties <https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/blob/master/build.properti

Ivy - Patch for IVY-1522 (needs to be tested on Windows OS)

2015-07-23 Thread Jaikiran Pai
ut in order to verify against Windows OS, it would have to be run against such a system. How is this currently handled? Should I go ahead and submit a PR at github and will it then be run by someone against a Windows OS? -Jai

Re: Looking to contribute

2015-07-27 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Could some please review the pull request? If there's a better way to send the commit/contributions instead of at github, do let me know, I'll resubmit. -Jaikiran On Sunday 19 July 2015 10:03 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Thank you Nicolas. I just submitted the first pull request which

Roadmap, goals, future of Ivy?

2015-08-22 Thread Jaikiran Pai
thub.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/7 -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: Roadmap, goals, future of Ivy?

2015-08-25 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Hi Conor, On Monday 24 August 2015 06:25 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: Stephen & Jaikiran, Thanks for your emails. I don't think anyone would be offended by your comments. They are well founded. I do think we need fresh blood for the Ivy sub-projects. Is there a formal process to init

Re: Roadmap, goals, future of Ivy?

2015-08-25 Thread Jaikiran Pai
do plan to help out in any way I can in those efforts. -Jaikiran On Tuesday 25 August 2015 04:34 AM, Charles Duffy wrote: One thing to note -- the bar for being admitted as a maintainer, and thus having the opportunity to help guide the project's future yourself, is by no means unattainable.

Re: Ivy - Patch for IVY-1522 (needs to be tested on Windows OS)

2015-08-30 Thread Jaikiran Pai
I have sent a PR with a fix for IVY-1522 https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/8 which will have to be tested against a Windows OS. -Jaikiran On Thursday 23 July 2015 06:48 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I have a patch (along with a testcase) for this issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY

Ivy - any future or is it also going to be retired?

2016-12-04 Thread Jaikiran Pai
If there's an official word on where it stands in terms of projects goals, we can officially move to a different build system. -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional com

Re: AW: Ivy - any future or is it also going to be retired?

2016-12-05 Thread Jaikiran Pai
p/future, the answer seems to suggest that it does have a future. However, with more than a year since I last asked this question (in this mailing list) and with no real development or releases during that period, I don't believe that's the case. -Jaikiran Jan -Ursprüngliche

Re: Ivy - any future or is it also going to be retired?

2016-12-05 Thread Jaikiran Pai
tself needs to be used in serious projects, there needs to be an active community and usable ecosystem around it, headed by developers who are able to invest time and interest in it. -Jaikiran IMHO, IvyDE works well with Eclipse; perhaps its release cycle needs to be synced with Ivy releas

Re: Ivy - any future or is it also going to be retired?

2016-12-05 Thread Jaikiran Pai
s using/trying to use it, there's really nothing to look forward to in terms of roadmap or releases or development. [1] http://marc.info/?l=ant-dev&m=143702067424412&w=2 [2] http://marc.info/?l=ant-dev&m=143765756710466&w=2 [3] http://marc.info/?l=ant-dev&m=144026083515049&

Re: Ivy - any future or is it also going to be retired?

2016-12-07 Thread Jaikiran Pai
this already available in the project/Ant ecosystem somewhere? Something like a Jenkins? If not, is there any other option we have to make sure we really release something that is reproducible? -Jaikiran On Wednesday 07 December 2016 05:36 PM, Oulds, Jonathan wrote: Nicolas raises some great

Re: AW: Ivy - any future or is it also going to be retired?

2016-12-07 Thread Jaikiran Pai
st of JIRAs which might be worth to be included in the proposed release (whenever next it happens). Of course, someone who has more knowledge about the project can do this and I'll happily step aside from that task. -Jaikiran On Wednesday 07 December 2016 08:41 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:

Ivy JIRA issues - how do I subscribe?

2016-12-07 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Is there a specific mailing list to where the Ivy JIRA issue notifications go to? I would like to subscribe to these issues and I can't find a way in JIRA project to send me notifications only for Ivy project JIRAs. -Jai

Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

2016-12-11 Thread Jaikiran Pai
eopened)%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(2.1.0%2C%202.2.0%2C%202.3.0%2C%202.4.0%2C%202.4.0-RC1)%20AND%20updated%20%3E%3D%202014-01-01%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC [2] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/11 [3] https://gith

Re: Is Ivy development restarting?

2017-01-07 Thread Jaikiran Pai
und to see if anything improves at least a month more. From what I have seen so far, it's been more of promises that things could improve but there hasn't been any realistic changes on the development side. -Jaikiran On Friday 06 January 2017 11:09 PM, Chris Welty wrote: I see the

Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0

2017-01-16 Thread Jaikiran Pai
like the complete stacktrace, can you post the complete stacktrace? -Jaikiran On Tuesday 17 January 2017 10:44 AM, Sarika Sinha wrote: Thanks Stefan for the inputs, I could solve the other problems at Eclipse IDE code level, but I am still stuck with "missing stack frames while debugging Ant w

Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0

2017-01-16 Thread Jaikiran Pai
oint us to how it deals with this communication? Either way, I am not yet sure this is specific to Ant. Is this reproducible if you try and debug a remote Java application from eclipse with those specific versions of Java? -Jaikiran On Tuesday 17 January 2017 11:51 AM, Sarika S

Ivy - we have now moved to asciidoc for docs

2017-06-18 Thread Jaikiran Pai
into the asciidoc files. -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Process for handling GitHub PRs and closing them

2017-06-18 Thread Jaikiran Pai
should follow with PRs? The other thing I had in mind, if we agree upon, is to have an enhancement raised with the ASF infra team to allow adding some specific comment on the open PR by a *committer* which then auto-closes the PR. Some comment like “This PR is merged”. Any thoughts? -Jaikiran

Ivy jobs on Teamcity need reconfiguring

2017-06-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
?buildTypeId=bt125&guest=1 -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: Process for handling GitHub PRs and closing them

2017-06-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 19-Jun-2017, at 2:43 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > >> Le 19 juin 2017 à 05:14, Jaikiran Pai a écrit : >> >> We have (read only) github repos which back our main ASF git repos (consider >> the github ant-ivy repo which is a read-only mirror of ASF git repo). Use

Re: Ivy - we have now moved to asciidoc for docs

2017-06-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Yes, that appears to be the only place where we explain documentation contribution. However, the IvyDE project page too points to this page. That’s a reminder for us that the IvyDE project too probably needs to move to asciidoc. -Jaikiran On 20-Jun-2017, at 3:39 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote

Re: Ivy - we have now moved to asciidoc for docs

2017-06-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
> > On 20-Jun-2017, at 3:38 AM, Nicolas Lalevée > wrote: > > >> Le 19 juin 2017 à 04:52, Jaikiran Pai a écrit : >> >> The documentation for ant-ivy project has now been migrated to asciidoc. The >> migration used a tool developed by Nicolas to mi

Re: Ivy 2.5 and generics

2017-06-20 Thread Jaikiran Pai
without evaluating the kind of impact it has on the external libraries that use Ivy. Ultimately, I believe this will come down to a case-by-case basis. -Jaikiran On 19-Jun-2017, at 10:12 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: During a discussion about goals for Ivy 2.5, I mentioned generics [1]. I was

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

2017-06-25 Thread Jaikiran Pai
The retrieve failure looks like a genuine bug which might be related to one of the changes I had done in one of the PRs a while back. I’ll take a look at this today. -Jaikiran On 25-Jun-2017, at 8:27 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: Hi, I worked on the Jenkins jobs to make them work. There was

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

2017-06-28 Thread Jaikiran Pai
I pushed a fix for this a few days back and the job is now functioning correctly. -Jaikiran On 26-Jun-2017, at 8:15 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: The retrieve failure looks like a genuine bug which might be related to one of the changes I had done in one of the PRs a while back. I’ll take a look at

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

2017-06-28 Thread Jaikiran Pai
latest snapshots. The only way this job differs from the nightly one now is that the nightly one currently publishes the latest (site) docs too. I guess that’s not a big thing since we will soon be publishing the latest site docs live on the Ant site (under the “master” section). -Ja

Re: Ivy - we have now moved to asciidoc for docs

2017-06-28 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Build/artifact/build/doc/settings.html [2] See “Hierarchical Index” section at https://builds.apache.org/view/A/view/Ant/job/Ivy-NightlyDistribution/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/build/doc/ivyfile.html -Jaikiran On 24-Jun-2017, at 7:18 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > >> >> And just

Re: Ivy - we have now moved to asciidoc for docs

2017-06-29 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 29-Jun-2017, at 3:58 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > >> Le 29 juin 2017 à 07:59, Jaikiran Pai a écrit : >> >> A quick update on this one - I finished off the “settings” sections last >> week. There is only one pending item that I’m trying to address in that >

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

2017-06-29 Thread Jaikiran Pai
I have now disabled the nightly job[1] and added a note to the job's description stating that the latest binaries can be obtained from the other Ivy job[2]. [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy-NightlyDistribution/ [2] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy/lastSuccessfulBuild/ -Jaikiran

Re: Ivy - we have now moved to asciidoc for docs

2017-07-01 Thread Jaikiran Pai
for it) https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/48#discussion-diff-125161935R162. Other than that, the PR looks fine to me. -Jaikiran On 01-Jul-2017, at 5:37 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: Thank you very much Gintas. These PRs are huge, so they will take a little bit of time to process. Also, in

Re: Ivy - we have now moved to asciidoc for docs

2017-07-01 Thread Jaikiran Pai
” note/section that we repeat (copy/paste really) on our OSGi pages. -Jaikiran > Le 29 juin 2017 à 15:16, Jaikiran Pai a écrit : > > > On 29-Jun-2017, at 3:58 PM, Nicolas Lalevée > wrote: > >> >>> Le 29 juin 2017 à 07:59, Jaikiran Pai a écrit : >>>

Re: Ivy - we have now moved to asciidoc for docs

2017-07-01 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 29-Jun-2017, at 11:29 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > I’m picking up “OSGi” section next. I have completed and pushed the migration of “OSGi” and “Using standalone” sections to upstream (it’s actually live on site since yesterday). For the OSGi pages, I had to reword some of the content to

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: IvyDE #320

2017-07-10 Thread Jaikiran Pai
tools/gef/downloads/drops/3.9.100/R201405261516/ -Jaikiran

Re: Fw: [2/2] ant-ivy git commit: Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master'

2017-07-12 Thread Jaikiran Pai
I'm guessing that while committing the fix for IVY-1404 you probably did a "git merge" against latest master of upstream, which created this merge commit. -Jaikiran On 12/07/17 1:45 PM, Maarten Coene wrote: Any idea where this commit comes from?I didn't touch any of th

Re: Fw: [2/2] ant-ivy git commit: Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master'

2017-07-13 Thread Jaikiran Pai
ommits. In this specific case this merge commit just points to the previous commit that was already in the upstream repo. We won't have to revert anything. -Jaikiran On 13/07/17 5:47 AM, Maarten Coene wrote: I remember IntelliJ was saying something about a failed commit asking me to merge

Proposed changes for IVY-735 - Ability to specify timeouts

2017-07-14 Thread Jaikiran Pai
ts, but if this whole approach looks fine, I will take this further and make sure things work as expected. [1] https://github.com/jaikiran/ant-ivy/commit/e501d9deca78db8b934f8a2710ebcfeaeb1456c8 [2] https://github.com/jaikiran/ant-ivy/commit/e501d9deca78db8b934f8a2710ebcfeaeb145

Proposed changes for IVY-735 - Ability to specify timeouts

2017-07-14 Thread jaikiran . pai
sing these additional XML elements, but if this whole approach looks fine, I will take this further and make sure things work as expected. [1] https://github.com/jaikiran/ant-ivy/commit/e501d9deca78db8b934f8a2710ebcfeaeb1456c8 [2] https://github.com/jaikiran/ant-ivy/commit/e501d9deca78db8b934f8a2

Re: Coding style: import of nested classes

2017-07-20 Thread Jaikiran Pai
of it to use instead of trying to make it consistent via checkstyle or refactoring. -Jaikiran On 18/07/17 5:09 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: In my last PR I tried to address inconsistencies with import of nested classes, such as Map.Entry; some classes, e.g. IvySettings ended up with foreach

Re: Proposed changes for IVY-735 - Ability to specify timeouts

2017-07-21 Thread Jaikiran Pai
though I did actually write a test to verify this behaivour, I may have missed or misunderstood the parsing code so if anyone thinks what I state isn't accurate, feel free to correct me. [1] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/54 [2] https://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/set

Re: Next Ivy release?

2017-07-22 Thread Jaikiran Pai
In short, yes - there's a plan to have a Ivy release soon. A more detailed explanation is available in this recent Ivy users mailing list thread https://www.mail-archive.com/ivy-user@ant.apache.org/msg06244.html -Jaikiran On 22/07/17 8:12 AM, Nick C. wrote: Will there be a new Ivy re

Re: Broken link at https://ant.apache.org/mail.html

2017-07-23 Thread Jaikiran Pai
It looks like the domain got repurposed sometime in 2012. -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Ivy - No more support for commons-httpclient 2.x in runtime classpath?

2017-07-23 Thread Jaikiran Pai
lob/master/ivy.xml#L47 -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: AW: Ivy - No more support for commons-httpclient 2.x in runtime classpath?

2017-07-23 Thread Jaikiran Pai
dropping commons-httpclient 3.x and moving to the more latest HttpComponents Client sounds fine to me. -Jaikiran So I'm +1 in dropping commons-http-2 support. What about dropping commons-http-3 too? Here I can't see the requirement for having this dynamic loading (but maybe s

Re: Ivy - No more support for commons-httpclient 2.x in runtime classpath?

2017-07-23 Thread Jaikiran Pai
That's a a big enough reason to move to HttpComponents Client 4.x version! I'll have that done in this release of Ivy then. -Jaikiran On 24/07/17 11:43 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-07-24, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Ivy currently uses commons-httpclient for dealing with HTTP re

Re: Ivy - No more support for commons-httpclient 2.x in runtime classpath?

2017-07-25 Thread Jaikiran Pai
ist to give the latest snapshot a try to see if there are any unforeseen regressions. -Jaikiran On 25/07/17 12:37 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: Le 24 juil. 2017 à 08:19, Jaikiran Pai a écrit : That's a a big enough reason to move to HttpComponents Client 4.x version! I'll have that do

Ivy Jenkins jobs have been failing - infra issues

2017-07-26 Thread Jaikiran Pai
me to check the Infra team mailing list or their JIRA to see if this is already reported by other projects. I will see if I can find some time tonight to check that and report it, if it hasn't yet been. -Jaikiran - To

Ivy - Move to symlink creation standard Java API?

2017-07-26 Thread Jaikiran Pai
ml#createSymbolicLink(java.nio.file.Path,%20java.nio.file.Path,%20java.nio.file.attribute.FileAttribute...) -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Ivy #627

2017-07-26 Thread Jaikiran Pai
To avoid more such mails, I'm going to disable this job for a few hours till we get the infra issues sorted out. -Jaikiran On 26/07/17 10:44 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: See <https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy/627/display/redirect> -- St

Re: Ivy Jenkins jobs have been failing - infra issues

2017-07-26 Thread Jaikiran Pai
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14712 -Jaikiran On 26/07/17 6:36 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: More of a FYI than anything else - the past couple of days or so, we haven't had regular successful runs of our various Ivy Jenkins jobs. Each run failing with different errors, all poi

Re: Ivy - Move to symlink creation standard Java API?

2017-07-27 Thread Jaikiran Pai
. -Jaikiran On 27/07/17 5:07 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: I did a few simple tests on Windows 7 + Cygwin and NIO.2 seems to work just fine (if privilege to create symlinks is granted). +1 Gintas 2017-07-27 11:40 GMT+02:00 Gintautas Grigelionis : There might be some issues with Cygwin

Re: AW: Ivy - Move to symlink creation standard Java API?

2017-07-27 Thread Jaikiran Pai
ruled out this feature on native Windows completely. With the usage of the standard API, that's no longer the case. -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands

Is CacheResolver relevant?

2017-07-27 Thread Jaikiran Pai
this, I think that's what we will have to do. On the other hand, if we don't have to support this, then I can just remove it from that typedef.properties file. [1] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/blob/master/src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/resolver/CacheR

Re: Is CacheResolver relevant?

2017-07-27 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 27/07/17 9:34 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: There's a JIRA[2] asking for the docs to be updated to explain this resolver. ... [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-804 I meant this JIRA which asks for it to be documented https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-612 -Jai

Ivy - PR-57 need inputs

2017-07-28 Thread Jaikiran Pai
which has that new method, but I think that should be fine for now. I would like some inputs on how we should go about this. [1] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/57/files#diff-8078d19e36e6c0b7abb0690fca45db0fR191 -Jaikiran -

Ivy - PR-57 need inputs

2017-07-28 Thread Jaikiran Pai
which has that new method, but I think that should be fine for now. I would like some inputs on how we should go about this. [1] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/57/files#diff-8078d19e36e6c0b7abb0690fca45db0fR191 -Jaikiran -

Re: IVY-1485

2017-08-07 Thread Jaikiran Pai
I'm looking into that JIRA. I'll assigned it to my name now. -Jaikiran On 06/08/17 12:52 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: I went through JIRA issues and noticed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1485 was discussed relatively recently ;-) Anybody looking into it? Gintas

Re: Documentation-related issues in Jira

2017-08-22 Thread Jaikiran Pai
s weekend. -Jaikiran On 23/08/17 12:12 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: Earlier, I wrote about the amount of documentation-related issues in Jira. There are 27 of them still open [1], and some of them could be closed right away. I would be glad to help, but I have no privileges. Is there somebody

Re: Ant-Ivy: Publish don't pull declared dependencies

2017-08-28 Thread Jaikiran Pai
As far as I know, the publish task itself doesn't fetch any dependencies. The dependencies itself are downloaded by a (previous) resolve task that is invoked separately and explicitly. -Jaikiran On 31/07/17 11:32 PM, maikel van den Hurk wrote: Hi all, I am wondering if there is alre

Re: Broken tutorial

2017-08-28 Thread Jaikiran Pai
ses a best effort algorithm during install, so that everything gets installed except the missing artifacts. (Note: these missing artifacts are not in the public maven repository due to licensing issues) ... [1] http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/master/tutorial/build-repository/basic.html

Ivy - Latest snapshots will now be regularly available in Apache Maven Snapshot repository

2017-08-31 Thread Jaikiran Pai
version) are:     org.apache.ivy     ivy     2.5.0-SNAPSHOT and can be found here https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.5.0-SNAPSHOT/ [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy-Snapshot-Deploy/ [2] https://repository.apache.org/snapshots/ -Jaikiran

Re: Broken tutorial

2017-08-31 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 29/08/17 12:35 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: I noticed another problem with asciidoc: 1.5.4 fails on my box with the latest Java 8u144, I had to downgrade it to 1.5.3 -- did anyone else see that? 1.5.4 works fine for me with Java 8. -Jaikiran

Re: [1/6] ant-ivy git commit: Documentation review (partly inspired by IVY-1089) [Forced Update!]

2017-09-05 Thread Jaikiran Pai
merge conflicts, if any) against the relevant branch of the latest upstream. -Jaikiran On 06/09/17 8:46 AM, gin...@apache.org wrote: Repository: ant-ivy Updated Branches: refs/heads/master 614bf1ad5 -> b693aa0a2 (forced update) http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ant-ivy/blob/b693a

Ivy upcoming release - where we stand

2017-09-11 Thread Jaikiran Pai
d fixing certain other issues that have been reported in JIRA. But at this point, I plan to just focus on this single issue (and one minor task involving reviewing the tutorial docs), before I personally consider things done

Re: Error while testing 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT

2017-09-14 Thread Jaikiran Pai
instead of the BasicURLHandler. That seems to be one part of the problem. I'll take a more detailed look after checking out the code which invokes Ivy. -Jaikiran On 14/09/17 1:57 PM, Aurélien Pupier wrote: Hello, I'm trying to test https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-156

Re: Ivy upcoming release - where we stand

2017-09-24 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Since the latest released version of that library is 1.58, I think we should use that version, unless there's a specific reason to not use it. A quick compilation of Ivy with this library and checking their docs for JDK compatibility suggested no issues with 1.58. -Jaikiran On 19/09/

Re: Error while testing 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT

2017-09-25 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Is there a source repo and steps that I can follow to build and reproduce this issue? My attempts so far haven't been able to reproduce this. -Jaikiran On 14/09/17 1:57 PM, Aurélien Pupier wrote: Hello, I'm trying to test https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1568 using la

Re: ant-ivy git commit: IVY-1420 document current implementation [Forced Update!]

2017-10-21 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Let's not force update the upstream repo please, especially the real branches like the master branch. -Jaikiran On 21/10/17 10:22 PM, gin...@apache.org wrote: Repository: ant-ivy Updated Branches: refs/heads/master 744c31824 -> 2074889ec (forced update) IVY-1420 document

Re: [2/2] ant-ivy git commit: No need to synchronise a concurrent map

2017-11-01 Thread Jaikiran Pai
ized block removed, it no longer guarantees the entire block to be done serially by a single thread anymore. -Jaikiran On 02/11/17 2:50 AM, gin...@apache.org wrote: No need to synchronise a concurrent map Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ant-ivy/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.

Re: new JDK version scheme

2017-11-28 Thread Jaikiran Pai
version. [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223 [2] https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/lang/Runtime.html#version-- -Jaikiran On 28/11/17 10:10 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-11-28, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Maybe we really need to start parsing the java.ver

Re: ant-ivy git commit: tidy up the code

2017-12-08 Thread Jaikiran Pai
m inconsistent when someone adding new code using a different construct (like not using explicit brackets), but it's not that big a deal, IMO. -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

2017-12-10 Thread Jaikiran Pai
I'll investigate why this is failing (local tests pass for me) and fix it. -Jaikiran On 10/12/17 2:29 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: See <https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux/jdk=JDK%201.8%20(latest)/977/display/redirect?page

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

2017-12-10 Thread Jaikiran Pai
You are right, that indeed was the issue (for one of that failing test). I have pushed a commit with this change to fix that one. -Jaikiran On 10/12/17 3:13 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-12-10, Stefan Bodewig wrote: testCreateDoubleHanging is related to https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla

Potential breaking change to symlink task [ was Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977]

2017-12-10 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 10/12/17 3:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-12-10, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I'll investigate why this is failing (local tests pass for me) and fix it. Target testCreateOverFile in the antunit test explicitly tries to replace a file with a link, doing exactly what the bugzilla report

Re: Potential breaking change to symlink task [ was Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977]

2017-12-11 Thread Jaikiran Pai
s set of changes, I am willing to undo them and go back to the original state that was before I started these changes. [1] https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/b3c7d5dc451960986a94d24785a2c1d24b0b0d6a -Jaikiran On 10/12/17 5:15 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: [@Steve I'm trying to drag

Re: Potential breaking change to symlink task [ was Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977]

2017-12-11 Thread Jaikiran Pai
. Done. The documentation of symlink task is now updated https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/485b92fe7494c5473e019329cbf7a33e556acad6 -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

2017-12-12 Thread Jaikiran Pai
0(latest)/testReport/org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.unix/SymlinkTest/testRecreate/ -Jaikiran On 10/12/17 3:13 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-12-10, Stefan Bodewig wrote: testCreateDoubleHanging is related to https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 judging from the history. Here the link points to a n

Please ignore the github emails for the next hour or so

2017-12-12 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Sorry about the continuous mails from github/ant repo. I'm (yet again) trying to get the Jenkins job integrated with Ant github repo. I don't have a way to disable these mails while I experiment with it to get it right. Hopefully, it should be sorted out in the next hour or so.

Github ant repo now integrated with Jenkins for pull request testing

2017-12-12 Thread Jaikiran Pai
t [2] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/ -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: Please ignore the github emails for the next hour or so

2017-12-12 Thread Jaikiran Pai
My experiments have completed [1] and any new mails from github/jenkins jobs are genuine mails. Hopefully, the next time I try something around this, it won't take these many spurious mails. [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ant.apache.org/msg46284.html -Jaikiran On 12/12/17 7:

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

2017-12-12 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Do let me know if there's anything I can do to help investigate this. I'm curious myself to see what's causing this. -Jaikiran On 13/12/17 2:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-12-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-12-12, Jaikiran Pai wrote: So the one final test that

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Ant-Build-Matrix-1.9.x-Linux » JDK 1.6 (latest) #134

2017-12-13 Thread Jaikiran Pai
ch[1]. So most likely _not_ a coincidence. But given this a JVM crash (in Java 6), it most likely is a JVM issue. I'll see if I can find something on this, before we decide if at all we need to rollback that commit. [1] https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/0fd2a86369aab41db316b1064a559bae08afae0f -Jaikiran

Re: Github ant repo now integrated with Jenkins for pull request testing

2017-12-13 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 12/12/17 8:05 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: The next few days, I'll probably try and see if I can get a Linux based job to run alongside this Windows job for PRs. We now have a Linux one too for the PRs https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/. It has the same characteristi

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Ant-Build-Matrix-1.9.x-Linux » JDK 1.6 (latest) #134

2017-12-13 Thread Jaikiran Pai
It's back to normal [1], so the crash seems to be specific to certain nodes on Jenkins, for Java 6. I don't plan to look more into this. [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix-1.9.x-Linux/jdk=JDK%201.6%20(latest)/135/ -Jaikiran On 13/12/17 8:40 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrot

Ant support for users who use JUnit5

2017-12-14 Thread Jaikiran Pai
            [1] http://junit.org/junit5/ [2] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61796 [3] https://github.com/jaikiran/ant/commit/42c7f221a8cd0848df0a2d6cac2897c07d446bda -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-m

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

2017-12-14 Thread Jaikiran Pai
by changing the internal implementation detail of this task (and maybe removing support for certain attributes). Either way, I would still like to hear others thoughts on this. -Jaikiran On 14/12/17 3:39 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I've started some experiments in adding support for the rec

Re: Ant support for users who use JUnit5

2017-12-15 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Thank you. I'm moving ahead with the new proposed task. Hopefully I should be able to have something functional in a few days. -Jaikiran On 14/12/17 5:14 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-12-14, Jaikiran Pai wrote: With that context, I would like to explain what I have attempted so fa

Re: ant git commit: logs say "link has been created", is it a timing issue?

2017-12-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
code which check that file1 exists. Furthermore, given that this is manifesting for all the links in that properties file, it looks a very generic issue and not just to this specific "link1" symlink. To make it much more weird, if I run this exact same state of "master" bran

Re: ant git commit: disable a bunch of caches, just so we've tried that as well

2017-12-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
[exec] [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.276 sec -Jaikiran On 19/12/17 5:02 PM, bode...@apache.org wrote: Repository: ant Updated Branches: refs/heads/master c2c821a38 -> 3dad11d41 disable a bunch of caches, just so we've tried that

Re: ant git commit: disable a bunch of caches, just so we've tried that as well

2017-12-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 19/12/17 5:13 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Looking at the JDK code, I still am not sure which exact code path triggers this stale/invalid cache in this specific case, but apparently it does. Now that we know the canonical path cache is playing a role, I think the only way this issue makes

Re: [GitHub] ant pull request #:

2017-12-20 Thread Jaikiran Pai
No specific reason, just that I'm more used to using the javadoc variant of @deprecated since it allows explaining what's deprecated and why. I have now added the @Deprecated annotation too and pushed a commit. -Jaikiran On 20/12/17 11:08 PM, twogee wrote: Github user twogee co

delete task with a wildcard "file"

2017-12-20 Thread Jaikiran Pai
s expected that it should work even with file="*.something" then let me know, I'll undo this change and see how I can fix the regression. -Jaikiran On 21/12/17 10:21 AM, jaiki...@apache.org wrote: Repository: ant Updated Branches: refs/heads/master 1a2c33fd0 -> ca91b85

Re: delete task with a wildcard "file"

2017-12-20 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 21/12/17 10:42 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-12-21, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I committed this change below, to use a resource collection to allow the build to pass, which had started failing on Windows, after I did a recent change to the delete task to use Java 7 java.nio.file.Files API

Re: Ivy-2.5.0

2018-01-08 Thread Jaikiran Pai
d number of fixes in this release and it's time that we have them available to the general public. -Jaikiran On 08/01/18 8:18 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: I took my old TODO list for Ivy-2.5.0. Most of them are still open, how to deal with that? In my opinion we should try to get a relea

Re: Ivy-2.5.0

2018-01-09 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Thanks Maarten, I'll look this. -Jaikiran On 09/01/18 5:53 PM, Maarten Coene wrote: The change to the URLHandler class (TimoutConstraint) is also backwards incompatible.The IvyIdea plugin (IntelliJ) breaks on this which contains an extension of AbstractURLHandler. I didn't look i

Re: Ant Release Process

2018-01-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
cific changes/suggestions to add especially since the steps themselves are clear enough and this only just affects the people who do the releases. -Jaikiran On 28/12/17 10:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi over in https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/54 Gintas is proposing to automate some of

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >