.
[1]
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk17_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/75/testReport/src.tests.antunit.taskdefs/javadoc-test_xml/testFailOnWarning/
[2]
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/2021-June/003075.html
-Jaikiran
On 25/06/21
rmissions.html
[3] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17/pull/13
-Jaikiran
On 27/06/21 11:22 pm, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Open JDK 17 build 17-ea+28-2534 causes the ant 1.10.6 task to
produce the following warnings when you DON'T fork the JVM:
WARNING: A terminally deprecated method in java.lang.System ha
cussion in security-dev mailing list of OpenJDK, explaining how this
is currently impacting Ant project and some potential ways to reduce
this impact. The discussion thread is here
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2021-June/026660.html
-Jaikiran
On 28/06/21 8:22 pm, Ric
-1.4.1.jar is present
- Verified the ant-antunit-1.4.1.jar.sha512 checksum is correct.
No issues found.
-Jaikiran
On 03/07/21 6:11 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for AntUnit 1.4.1:
git tag: 1_4_1_RC1
on commit: e436acf
tarballs:
+1.
Downloaded the .tar.gz binary, checked the NOTICE file, some manuals and
built our internal projects using this new version. All went fine.
-Jaikiran
On 11/07/21 12:21 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.11:
git tag: ANT_1.10.11_RC1
+1.
Downloaded .tar.gz binary. Checked some manuals and the NOTICE file.
Used this version to build some of our internal projects. All went fine.
-Jaikiran
On 10/07/21 11:43 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.16:
git tag: ANT_1.9.16_RC1
Hello Rory,
We ran this against our Ant project and no new issues have been observed
with both these JDK 17 and 18 EA builds.
-Jaikiran
On 16/07/21 12:51 am, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
*Per the JDK 17 schedule , we are in Rampdown Phase Two [1].*
*Please advise if you
rityManager API changes). Given this, I would like to have some
discussion on how we should proceed with this.
[1] https://ant.apache.org/manual/Types/permissions.html
[2]
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2021-June/026660.html
-Jaikiran
-
Hello Rory,
I ran our Ant testsuite on a Linux setup against both Java 17 and Java
18 EA releases. No new issues noticed and things look fine.
-Jaikiran
On 07/08/21 8:23 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
*Per the JDK 17 schedule , we are now in the Release Candidate Phas
Hello Stefan,
On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-08-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Ant project will be impacted by this. Ant provides a "permissions"
type[1] whose whole goal is to integrate with the Java SecurityManager
to allow users to configure the necessary security p
On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-08-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Ant project will be impacted by this. Ant provides a "permissions"
type[1] whose whole goal is to integrate with the Java SecurityManager
to allow users to configure the necessary security permissions
On 19/08/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-08-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello Stefan,
On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
At a cursory glance I only see JUnitTask and ExecuteJava deal with the
SecurityManager if permissions have been defined. Where else do we use
one?
From
On 23/08/21 9:17 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-08-23, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
On 19/08/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-08-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello Stefan,
On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
At a cursory glance I only see JUnitTask and ExecuteJava deal with the
Hello Stefan,
On 27/06/21 4:10 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-06-17, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
So right now I don't have specific proposals for fixing this but just
a note that we will have to look into this one for the upcoming JDK 17
release.
I guess we can simply concatenate stder
17_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/80/jdk_axis=jdk18_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/
-Jaikiran
On 14/09/21 8:37 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
*Release Announcement: General Availability of Java 17 / JDK 17 *
**
* J
e to do so - I
haven't done any real work on that one yet. Are there any other issues
that others are working on and want to be part of this release?
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
On 19/09/21 3:30 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-09-16, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-09-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I wanted to look into and sort out
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65424 in this release
too, but it looks like I may not be able to do that and I'm not sur
On 28/09/21 12:55 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-09-26, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I was planning to initiate a release tonight, but trying to upgrade
one of the optional dependencies has shown up some interesting issue
in the maven ant task (which apparently has been EOLed[1]) that we use
in
ch is necessary for it to work properly in the recently released
Java 17 version.
This vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
4th October 2021 03:00 AM UTC (given that it's a weekend in the next
couple of days, I decided to extend the voting period till Monday)
+1
- Downloaded the .tar.gz binary
- Checked the NOTICE file and some random manuals
- Built internal projects using Java 8 and this version of Ant
- Built some sample projects with Java 17 and this version Ant
All looks fine.
-Jaikiran
On 30/09/21 8:28 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I&#x
I'll need one more PMC member's vote on this for me to move forward.
Anyone have some time this week to test this?
-Jaikiran
On 03/10/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-09-30, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
This release is mainly a bug fix release and the exact changes are
note
egenerate the source
archives. Thank you very much for bringing it to attention.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
lease create a separate thread to discuss that.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
m.xml files.
As a result, I will cancel this vote and will initiate a new vote which
should include these fixes, shortly.
Thank you all for voting and testing the release artifacts. Sorry about
the delay in my responses this week - it has been a busy week at work.
-Jaikiran
On 07/10/21 7:
ories/orgapacheant-1052
Snapcraft Build
Revision 22 in latest/candidate
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours and close no earlier than
16th October 2021 05:30 AM UTC.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
+1.
- Used this version to build some of our internal projects.
- Checked some random manuals.
All looks fine.
-Jaikiran
On 13/10/21 11:05 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I've created a new RC2 release candidate for 1.10.12:
git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC2
on c
With +1s from:
- Stefan
- Maarten
- Jaikiran
and no other votes, this release vote has now *passed*.
Thank you all for voting, both on this one and the previous RC1. I'll
move forward with the rest of the process shortly.
-Jaikiran
On 18/10/21 2:52 pm, Maarten Coene wrote:
+1
Ma
Can someone with access to Bugzilla please create a new 1.10.12 product
version and a new 1.10.13 milestone version, for Ant? I'm almost done
with the rest of the release formalities and will send the release
annonucement later today.
-Jai
lonwarning" is set to true to account for changes in JDK 17+
* The tar task now preserves symlinks of nested tarfilesets.
Github Pull Request #142
-Jaikiran (on behalf of Apache Ant team)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 19/10/21 9:37 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-10-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Can someone with access to Bugzilla please create a new 1.10.12
product version and a new 1.10.13 milestone version, for Ant?
Done.
Thank you Stefan.
I don't think anybody else of the project team has e
Hello Rory,
I ran the JDK 18 EA (build 18-ea+20-1248) against our Ant testsuite on
Linux and no issues were encountered:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/82/jdk_axis=jdk18_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/
-Jaikiran
On 26/10/21 5:37 pm, Rory O'Donnell
this
version. We (Ant project) will be working on this to get it in working
shape, in the coming weeks.
-Jaikiran
On 16/11/21 4:22 pm, david.delabas...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Jaikiran/Stefan,
I’m happy to announce that moving forward Oracle’s Java DevRel Team
will manage the Quality Outreach
milar to *junit* task.
I've already started a related discussion on the PR (please, chime in):
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/171
I'll take a look at this one.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
t run results are available at:
Java 18 -
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/16/
Java 19 -
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/17/
-Jaikiran
On 31/01/22 2:47 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings!
n like Java 17 now work fine. However, like I said my
scripting skills are minimal, so if any of these changes in these
scripts can be done in a better way, please feel free to do so. I would
do it myself, but it's going to take me trial and error methods to get
it right :)
-Jaikiran
On 07
launching the JVM. There's no other way past
this if you want to use it against Java 18 or 19.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
ainst Java 7 at this point isn't worth it. I think as long as we do
the changes/modernizations in controlled manner it's a good idea and I'm
in favour of.
-Jaikiran
On 08/02/22 11:18 pm, Matt Benson wrote:
Java 7 public updates have ended nearly 7 years ago. Looking over the
Hello Stefan,
On 08/02/22 1:15 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2022-02-07, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
So the launch scripts (the Linux one and the .bat for Windows one)
have both been updated to set this system property only for Java 18
and 19. I expect this to be a temporary thing till the new API is
Hello Jan,
On 08/02/22 12:04 pm, Jan Lahoda wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:53 AM Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello Earl,
On 08/02/22 12:59 am, Earl Hood wrote:
How exactly does setting the sysprop for only 18 and 19 allow folks to
test
their stuff? If Ant currently depends on the security
the recent commits is in a
different job (on Windows) -
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Windows/OS=Windows,jdk=jdk_1.8_latest/120/testReport/src.tests.antunit.taskdefs/pathconvert-test_xml/testDirsep/
te by
enabling virtual threads preview feature and see how it goes.
-Jaikiran
On 16/05/22 1:13 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to a new Quality Outreach update!
This time, we have one update but a major one: JEP 425 (Virtual
Threads preview) has been integrated into the OpenJDK mainline! JDK 1
va 18
and 19 EA (which have changes in the security manager area). The way we
did it isn't the most optimal way (but works). So I just want to find
some time to review that once again before deciding on how we want to go
about it.
-Jaikiran
On 03/06/22 9:40 pm, Simon Law wrote:
Hel
rity on which ones to focus on next).
-Jaikiran
On 06/06/22 4:19 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi
right now the Loom prototype doesn't play well with synchronized and the
recommended approach is to use ReentrantLock instead. A quick grep over
Ant's codebase turns up more than 500 hits fo
Hello David,
We ran the Ant testsuite against JDK 19 EA build 19-ea+26-2060 on a
Linux system. No issues were found in this run
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/26/.
-Jaikiran
On 13/06/22 6:47 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings!
JDK
Additionally, I ran the Ant testsuite on a macos setup locally with JDK
19 EA build 19-ea+26-2060 by using --enable-preview. No issues were
encountered in the testsuite.
-Jaikiran
On 16/06/22 7:11 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello David,
We ran the Ant testsuite against JDK 19 EA build 19-ea+26
ce too at https://issues.apache.org/. Moving to
Apache's JIRA instance _might_ be an option but I don't know what kind
of efforts would be involved and if those are worth it.
-Jaikiran
On 18/08/22 5:02 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi Vladimir
I guess we have to agree that we disag
With Ant 1.10.x version requiring Java 8, I think it should now be
possible for us to add a new (default) method to the
org.apache.tools.ant.BuildLogger interface to return the current set (or
some default) log level. I will add something along these lines shortly.
-Jaikiran
On 11/10/22 10
+1
- Downloaded the apache-ivy-2.5.1-bin.tar.gz.
- Installed locally.
- Ran java -jar $IVY_HOME/ivy-2.5.1.jar -version (correct version
reported)
- Then built a few existing projects with this version and they passed
- Checked some docs in the "doc" folder and they looked fine.
A new method has been introduced on BuildLogger interface called
getMessageOutputLevel() which will return the currently set level. This
will be available in the next Ant release.
-Jaikiran
On 11/10/22 10:38 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
With Ant 1.10.x version requiring Java 8, I think it should
sion[1]
about it in the past and I'll be focusing on this area to see if I can
improve that situation in this coming week before the release.
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/53jo1sy8ly2645j68m7s2g2mb4f10dy5
-Jaikiran
--
UL bytes inside of the "normal" part of
the name. I'll have to think about a way to solve this, but we should
not release Ant with this regression.
Please take your time, I won't rush the release. I'm still experimenting
with t
javadoc generation against the Ant project. I've filed
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8298525 with the details.
-Jaikiran
On 07/11/22 1:47 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings,
With JavaOne in Las Vegas, last month was epically busy! It was great
to finally have the ability to mee
am to catch up with
this change and see if there are any additional suggestions or issues
they notice.
-Jaikiran
On 18/11/22 5:07 am, Earl Hood wrote:
Figured give an update wrt our project: The method used by Netbeans project
as cited by Jan appears to work.
I have not done full testing
Hello Stefan,
On 18/11/22 2:40 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2022-11-16, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Users can still use the current released Ant version against these
recent Java versions, but they additionally have to set a system
property while launching Ant to allow setting the security
manager
1.10.12). Plus our testsuite continues to pass.
So that's a good thing.
[1] https://github.com/ibmruntimes/Semeru-Runtimes/issues/15
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
s and close no earlier than
7th January 2023 12 PM.
-Jaikiran (on behalf of Apache Ant team)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
+1
Tried the new version to build some existing projects - worked fine
Checked NOTICE file and some random manual docs - looks fine
-Jaikiran
On 06/01/23 4:57 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2023-01-04, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Happy new year, everyone :)
to you as well
I've created RC1 re
Thank you everyone for testing this release and voting on it. With +1s
from Stefan, me and Martijn, this release voting has now passed.
I'll now move ahead with the rest of the release process.
-Jaikiran
On 10/01/23 12:47 am, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
+1
checked diff to of indicated comm
new method
getMessageOutputLevel()
which returns the currently set message output level.
As usual, for asking help or reporting any issues, please continue to
communicate with us on our user mailing list
https://ant.apache.org/mail.html.
-Jaiki
Now that we have released 1.10.13 of Ant, could someone with bugzilla
access please create a new 1.10.13 product version and a new 1.10.14
milestone version, for Ant?
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Thank you Stefan. I didn't check before sending this mail :)
-Jaikiran
On 10/01/23 7:16 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2023-01-10, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Now that we have released 1.10.13 of Ant, could someone with bugzilla
access please create a new 1.10.13 product version and a new 1.
%20EA%20JDK)/34/
-Jaikiran
On 15/02/23 10:54 am, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the latest OpenJDK Quality Outreach update!
The first Release Candidates of JDK 20 have been released [1] as per
the schedule [2]. At this stage, only P1 issues will be evaluated. And
with the JDK 20 General
er is
deprecated and will be removed in a future release
[java] at
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecuteJava.execute(ExecuteJava.java:194)
which can happen if java wasn't launched using -Dsecurity.manager=allow
-Jaikiran
On 14/05/23 4:28 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
Mark ha
eived
reports that the "allow" workaround we introduced, has its own set of
issues. It was always a temporary change in Ant to allow for this
version of Ant to work against recent releases of Java. I'm in the
process of undoing this "allow" workaround and then completing
Hello David,
I ran the Ant testsuite against Java 21 EA build 21-ea+22-1890 and all
tests went fine without any failures
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/35/
-Jaikiran
On 15/05/23 8:08 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the latest
Hello Yuri,
There's a section in
https://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/2.5.1/tutorial/defaultconf.html
called "Setting up the repositories" which explains the use of the
ivy.default.ivy.user.dir property which controls this location.
-Jaikiran
On 07/08/23 1:42 pm, Yuri wrot
%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/38/
-Jaikiran
On 28/07/23 2:53 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the OpenJDK Quality Outreach summer update.
JDK 21 is now in Rampdown Phase Two [1], its overall feature has been frozen a
few weeks ago. Per the JDK Release Process [2] we have now turned our
I'll send out a formal vote mail for the
1.10.14 release, this coming week.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Sounds good to me.
-Jaikiran
On 13/08/23 4:45 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
while Jaikiran talks about release Ant, I intend to cut a new Ivy
release soonish. We've seen two bug fixes to Ivy
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/IVY/versions/12353013> and I
believe IVY-1
r.
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours and close no earlier than
19th August 2023 12 PM.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
after the
voting completes (won't create a new RC for that).
-Jaikiran
On 16/08/23 6:42 pm, Gary Gregory wrote:
(AFK) Does this remove the class file in the root of the ant-launcher jar which
caused JPMS issues? If so, it might be worth mentioning in the release no
nuals
- Checked the ivy jar usage with Java 8 and Java 20
- Ran some trivial projects using this new version of Ivy
-Jaikiran
On 17/08/23 10:02 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've built a release candidate for Ivy 2.5.2
Changelog:
- FIX: ivy:retrieve could fail because of a `NullPointe
pse update site? From what I remember that requires an
Eclipse installation locally, that too a very specific version.
Unfortunately, it's been an extremely long time since I ever used
Eclipse and I don't even have the setup I used many years back when
releas
+1
- Downloaded the newer version and checked the NOTICE file
- verified the checksum
- Built some projects using this newer version, on Java 8, 17 and 20
- Checked manual docs for some of the tasks
-Jaikiran
On 16/08/23 6:05 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've create
+1
Downloaded the RC2 of 2.5.2 and built some projects, checked some
manuals and docs and the checksum.
-Jaikiran
On 17/08/23 10:22 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've cancelled the previous vote as the NOTICE file didn't contain
2023. sorry about this. Now I've buil
With (binding) +1s for Stefan, Maarten, me and Paul (non-binding), this
vote has now passed. I'll now go ahead with the rest of the release process.
Thank you all for the help in moving this release forward.
-Jaikiran
On 16/08/23 6:05 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've c
ed to it, but I remember that when releasing Ivy 2.5.0, it was
struggle to update the IvyDE update site.
-Jaikiran
On 22/08/23 9:32 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
before I get to the actual content of this mail:
* I'm cross-posting to three lists but I ask you to keep responses to
dev@an
Can someone with admin permissions please mark 1.10.14 as a released
version in Ant bugzilla and create a new 1.10.15 release in it? I forgot
to ask for help when I released 1.10.14.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
Thank you Stefan. I probably didn't look correctly when trying to close
a recent bug that got fixed. I see that the bug is now correctly fixed
for 1.10.15. Thank you.
-Jaikiran
On 08/09/23 12:13 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2023-09-08, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Can someone with admin permis
Hello ewh, no that wasn't intentional and was an oversight. It was
reported recently and has been fixed in the master branch as part of
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67417.
-Jaikiran
On 29/09/23 2:46 am, Earl Hood wrote:
Ant Developers,
Was it intended to keep co
1.10.14, I have heard one confirmed report that the usage
of this Ant version has helped them build their project on Java 21.
There have been no reports of any usage issues with Java 21 and Ant
1.10.14 so far.
-Jaikiran
On 20/10/23 3:05 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings!
JDK 21
On 19/11/23 11:09 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
...
So here is the formal vote:
I hereby propose to create a board resolution that will send IvyDE to
the Apache Attic.
+1
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
+1 for retiring IvyDE.
-Jaikiran
On 23/11/23 12:49 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
I'm really sorry and embarrassed but I seem to have misunderstood the
purpose of the Attic, it is not responsible for retiring subprojects,
only for top level projects like Ant as a whole with all subprojects.
someone is working on anything that needs to be part of this release.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/49/
-Jaikiran
On 02/04/24 12:53 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the latest OpenJDK Quality Outreach update!
Java 22 was just released along with JavaFX 22 [1][2]. Thank you to all the
projects who contributed to those releases by
used to trigger some of these jobs,
please see if you are able to trigger one? My question to the infra team
hasn't seen any response so far.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additio
The Apache infra team have addressed this issue and I am now able to
trigger the job runs.
-Jaikiran
On 12/06/24 10:55 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
It looks like something has changed with our Jenkins instance and I
can no longer trigger Ant jobs - I don't see the "Build/Build with
Hello David,
I ran our Ant testsuite against JDK 23 EA build 23-ea+26-2269 and no
related issues were noticed
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/50/
-Jaikiran
On 10/06/24 12:58 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the latest OpenJDK
Implicit +1 from me.
-Jaikiran
On 16/06/24 11:40 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello everyone,
4 years back in 2020, we initiated an vote to EOL 1.9.x release
versions of Apache Ant. We didn't receive enough votes at that time to
formalize it (which is OK). The last release of Ant 1.9.x re
Hello everyone,
With binding +1s from Ant PMC members:
Dominique Devienne
Nicolas Lalevée
Martijn Kruithof
Maarten Coene
Jaikiran Pai
and a non-binding +1 from
Roger Whitcomb
and no other votes, it is decided that Apache Ant 1.9.x series is now
EOLed. There won't be any more Ant
In the coming days, I'll update relevant pages of our website to note
this decision.
-Jaikiran
On 19/06/24 2:56 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello everyone,
With binding +1s from Ant PMC members:
Dominique Devienne
Nicolas Lalevée
Martijn Kruithof
Maarten Coene
Jaikiran Pai
and a non-bindi
Hello David,
I ran our Ant testsuite against JDK 23 build 23-ea+33-2358. The tests
ran fine and no related issues were noticed
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/51/
-Jaikiran
On 22/07/24 10:55 am, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the
Hello Florian,
I have been meaning to release Ant 1.10.15 for a few weeks now, but
haven't found the time to do it. I will prioritize this in the coming weeks.
-Jaikiran
On 31/07/24 5:05 pm, Florian Rosenauer wrote:
Hi,
the last ant release 1.10.14 is now almost one year old, do you p
urs
and close no earlier than 21st August 2024 14:30 UTC.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
+1
- Downloaded the newer version and checked the NOTICE file
- verified the checksum
- Checked manual docs for some of the tasks
- Built some projects using Java 8 and Java 22 and this released version
of Ant.
-Jaikiran
On 18/08/24 7:46 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've cr
ahead and cancel this vote. I will create a new RC after addressing
these issues and will intiate a new vote soon.
-Jaikiran
On 21/08/24 4:23 am, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
Checked the diff between rel 1.10.14 and 1.10.15 RC 1 in git:
It seems the following changes are missing from the release
urs
and close no earlier than 28th August 2024 21:00 UTC.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
with FTPS.
Fixed the ftp documentation/manual as well as included this change in
the WHATSNEW file.
With these changes, I've now initiated a vote mail of RC2 for Ant
1.10.15 release. Thank you again for spotting these issues.
-Jaikiran
Thanks a lot!
Martijn
Op 19/08/2024 om 16:53
+1
-Jaikiran
On 25/08/24 8:49 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've created RC2 release candidate for Ant 1.10.15 release:
git tag: ANT_1.10.15_RC2
on commit: 92fe5ca29625d30b98704806d6379fe9acb001e3
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
svn revision:
With +1s from Martijn, Stefan, Maarten and me, this vote has now passed.
I'll now go ahead and complete the rest of the release process.
Thank you all for helping with this release.
-Jaikiran
On 27/08/24 11:33 am, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
+1
Martijn
Op 27/08/2024 om 03:42 schreef Jai
401 - 500 of 760 matches
Mail list logo
