Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r168983221
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/AbstractJUnitResultFormatter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r168983237
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/AbstractJUnitResultFormatter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60
@bodewig, Thank you very much for the review. Based on the review comments,
I have updated the PR with additional separate commits (for easier reference).
I'll be squashing all these commits tog
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r169624475
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/JUnitLauncherTask.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r169624837
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/JUnitLauncherTask.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r169624865
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/JUnitLauncherTask.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r169625878
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/JUnitLauncherTask.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r169626791
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/JUnitLauncherTask.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/pull/7
>> There is a regression in URLHandler to be dealt with
Actually, that's not a regression. It's a fix to a regression that I
introduced in one of the snapshots. 2.4.x
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/pull/8
IVYDE-386 Fix ClassCastException
This should fix the ClassCastException reported in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVYDE-386
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivyde/pull/7
@jonl-percsolutions-com Thank you for reporting the issue and then raising
this PR. I looked at the changes in this PR and it looks like this change will
silently ignore items that aren't of
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r172044509
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/AbstractJUnitResultFormatter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r172044665
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/AbstractJUnitResultFormatter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r172044717
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/AbstractJUnitResultFormatter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60
Thank you Stefan for the thorough review. I'll clean up the commits to
squash them into one and do these minor final changes before me
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r172044906
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/JUnitLauncherTask.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60
This is now merged upstream. Closing this PR. Thanks Stefan for the
extensive review.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Github user jaikiran closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/71
@aanno Thank you for the patch. This mostly looks fine. I have added some
review comments. Can you please also introduce a test case for this? Something
that tests that these command options are
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/71#discussion_r177694862
--- Diff: src/java/org/apache/ivy/Main.java ---
@@ -199,6 +201,10 @@ static CommandLineParser getParser() {
new OptionBuilder(&qu
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/71#discussion_r177694759
--- Diff: src/java/org/apache/ivy/Main.java ---
@@ -199,6 +201,10 @@ static CommandLineParser getParser() {
new OptionBuilder(&qu
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/71
@aanno, thank you for this PR. I have gone ahead and included your patch
with minor modifications to upstream and also included a test along with it. I
have also included your name in our release
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-antlibs-antunit/pull/1
Avoid potential thread safety issues in LogCapturer
This commit is prompted by the exception I saw in one of the Ant Jenkins
jobs which failed with:
```
/home/jenkins
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-antlibs-antunit/pull/1
Thank you. Merged.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/64
this is ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/64#discussion_r202054728
--- Diff: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/GenerateKey.java ---
@@ -413,6 +429,16 @@ public void execute() throws BuildException
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/64#discussion_r202287386
--- Diff: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/GenerateKey.java ---
@@ -413,6 +429,16 @@ public void execute() throws BuildException
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/64
Thank you @jnsnkrllive. This now looks fine to me. I'll merge this later
tonight/tomorrow, once our currently in-progress Ant release(s) are officially
anno
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/64
@jnsnkrllive I've merged this into 1.9.x as well as master branches. Thank
you for the PR. I've also included your name "Karl Jansen" in our contributors
list. If you like to use a
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/65
I picked the commit which updated just the documentation and merged it to
upstream.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/66
this is ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/73
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/73
>> By the way, latest commits 43ddccb and 5918182 introduced nested
"javaversion" element, which breaks Jenkins CI build; I had to remove this for
both
I just fixed the PR
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/73
Tests have passed https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy-GithubPR/361/
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/73
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/73
>> Should I reopen PR?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/67
Support for fork mode in junitlauncher
The commit here introduces support for launching the JUnit tests, through
`junitlauncher` task, in forked mode.
I decided to keep the fork aspects as a
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/67
>> Looks good at first glance, I'll have a more thorough look sometime
before we cut the next release.
Thank you.
>> The new files need to have license headers added.
Github user jaikiran closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/67
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/68
bz-62655 throw a BuildException from augment task
Reference https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62655
The manual of the augment task[1] states that it's supposed to th
DK 12 EA version a try:
java -version
openjdk version "12-ea" 2019-03-19
OpenJDK Runtime Environment 19.3 (build 12-ea+10)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 19.3 (build 12-ea+10, mixed mode)
and can confirm that this issue is indeed fixed in that version.
-Jaikiran
covered. However, I haven't been able to focus on it at a stretch and
would like to finish off some pending junitlauncher task work in Ant
project, before I can get to this. Hence I decided to undo my changes
for now and leave it in a state as of our latest released version.
-Jaikiran
On 29/
otifications instead of reviewing them, to avoid it ruining any energy
I might have to contribute anything in my spare time.
Committer rights is a privilege as well as a responsibility, but this
behaviour is nothing but an abuse of it and no different than being a troll.
-Jaikiran
On 10/09/18 5:12
.com/apache/ant/commit/54b6df2f44c5cb4f9573f99330c2d2908f1bf506
-Jaikiran
On 11/09/18 12:17 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> How was this different from PR #66?
>
> Gintas
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 06:55, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
>> Things haven't changed (nor
of classpath for 1.10.x
version. I hope to send out a PR for review this week and if it gets
accepted then I don't have anything else pending from a release point of
view.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@an
ome help from others.
-Jaikiran
On 29/09/18 1:28 AM, Basil Crow wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please forgive the cross-post from ivy-user, but I didn't get a reply
> there after waiting for a week. If there is some other forum I should
> be using to report this issue, please let me kno
I agree with Stefan, at the moment I recommend ignoring those warnings.
There isn't anything else we can do (other than removing support for
pack200, which isn't a good option).
-Jaikiran
On 10/10/18 9:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
>
> I'm not actively w
a
bit too early to do that. Maybe we should wait a few more releases of
Java and see if any alternatives show up?
[1]
https://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/concept.html#packaging
-Jaikiran
On 10/10/18 11:09 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
> If I understand Dragans point right, the
Could you tell us a bit more about what is being attempted? Are you
saying you plan to run the tests that are part of the Ant project,
through the mvn command, while building Ant?
-Jaikiran
On 20/10/18 3:31 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> I believe that in order to execute Ant test suite
that it might
create new file, so I think that's probably enough to hint that this
method could be expensive, so I won't add anything new to it.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
+1 for the move.
-Jaikiran
On 07/12/18 10:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all
>
> as indicated by Daniel we'll have to mover over sooner rather than later
> anyway. So we may better do so now with no release in sight.
>
> Any objections or do we want
der will have to learn some additional tricks for module support
> in the future.
Agreed, I haven't yet checked what more will be expected of classloader
post Java 9 but if it looks like better approach to lay the ground work
and c
On 17/12/18 2:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I will take care of Gump, if anybody else could look into Jenkins that
> would be great.
I'll take a look at the Jenkins jobs later tonight and update them as
necessary.
d Java versions for these libraries?
Should we now mandate Java 1.8 at least?
[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/AntLib-svn/
[2] https://builds.apache.org/job/AntLib-antunit/
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
On 19/12/18 11:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2018-12-18, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
>> One option in similar cases that we have employed in other jobs is to
>> configure the Java system property -Dhttps.protocols to "TLSv1.2". But
>> this version of TLS is only
[4].
[1] http://ant.apache.org/antlibs/svn/
[2] https://github.com/apache/ant-antlibs-svn/commits/master
[3]
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201812.mbox/%3c87k1k5wg7a@v45346.1blu.de%3e
[4] http://ant.apache.org/processes.
An implicit +1.
-Jaikiran
On 22/12/18 7:39 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This is a proposal to retire the "Antlib SVN" library[1]. The project
> hasn't seen any new development for many years now[2]. Retiring this
> will reduce the work necessary to maintain it[3] (Jekin
that
format was very convenient to do reviews. Would it be possible to have a
similar format (at least for Ant project(s)) for these notifications?
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
On 17/12/18 2:25 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2018-12-17, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
>> On 17/12/18 2:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>> I will take care of Gump, if anybody else could look into Jenkins that
>>> would be great.
>> I'll take a look at the Jenk
Hi Stefan,
Thank you for reminding me of those files. I have now pushed a commit in
both the branches which updates these files to use the new version.
-Jaikiran
On 27/12/18 3:04 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi Jaikiran
>
> you should probably also update manual/install.html as we
I haven't had a chance to try this on a Windows system.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
as I know, there isn't anything pending that needs
to go into this release. Is there any?
Should we do a new release in the upcoming weeks?
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additiona
With +1s from Jan, Stefan (and implicitly) me and no other votes, this
vote has passed. I'll start the process of retiring this project.
-Jaikiran
On 22/12/18 10:51 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2018-12-22, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
>> This is a proposal to retire the "Antli
thing else
pending.
[1] http://ant.apache.org/processes.html
-Jaikiran
On 22/01/19 7:27 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> With +1s from Jan, Stefan (and implicitly) me and no other votes, this
> vote has passed. I'll start the process of retiring this project.
>
> -Jaikiran
>
> On 22/1
Hi Rory,
On 21/01/19 4:45 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
> Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
>
> **OpenJDK builds *- JDK 12 Early Access build 28 **is now available
> **at : - jdk.java.net/12/*
>
Our testsuite on Linux with this EA version of of JDK 12 has passed fine
without issues. Haven&#x
Hi Dalibor,
On 23/01/19 2:51 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
>
> On 23.01.2019 08:56, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Our Ant testsuite against this EA version of JDK 13 has passed fine on
>> Linux. However, one of our other projects within the Ant umbrella has
>> shown an is
you.
-Jaikiran
On 19/02/19 3:04 AM, Craig Pell wrote:
> I have written a working solution for
> <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62772> and
> <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62789>, the requests
> for the task to support modular attri
,label_exp=ubuntu/
-Jaikiran
On 18/02/19 4:55 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
> Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
>
> **OpenJDK builds *- JDK 12 Early Access build 32 **is now available
> **at : - jdk.java.net/12/*
> **JDK 12: First Release Candidate [1]**
>
> * Per the JDK 12 schedule
Java 13 (even the latest EA 8 build).
-Jaikiran
On 23/01/19 7:00 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Hi Dalibor,
>
> On 23/01/19 2:51 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>
>> On 23.01.2019 08:56, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>>> Our Ant testsuite against this EA version of JDK 13 has passed fine
with a release
proposal.
-Jaikiran
On 02/03/19 1:21 AM, James Broadhead wrote:
> Hi there -
>
> What are the plans for a full 2.5.0 release? It's been a while since the
> release candidate release in April 2018. Are there any release blockers
> that have been discovered?
>
&g
Hi Eugène,
I have updated that manual and also marked this bugzilla as resolved.
Thanks for bringing this up.
-Jaikiran
On 06/03/19 12:50 PM, Eugène Adell wrote:
> Hello Jaikiran,
>
> if you are changing the doc, there's one bug that I opened a couple of
> days ago ( http
ommit: 8ec8ecf4eb94b238b09161055e75508155040180
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 32887
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1036/org/apache/ant/
This Vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
15th March 2019 10:00UTC.
-Jai
+1
- Downloaded the .tar.gz binary
- Installed the new 1.9.14 release.
- Checked some manuals.
- Used this version to build some internal projects.
All went fine.
-Jaikiran
On 12/03/19 3:32 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've created a new release candidate fo
a note about the NOTICE file header check in our
release instructions, so that we remember to check such files during the
release process.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Hi all,
With +1s from Maarten, Stefan and me (implicit) and no other votes, this
vote has passed.
I'll start the rest of the release process. Thank you for voting.
-Jaikiran
On 12/03/19 3:32 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've created a new release candidate for 1
structions on how to submit
bug reports, patches, or suggestions for improvement, see the Apache Ant
website:
http://ant.apache.org/
- Jaikiran, on behalf of the Apache Ant community
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ntent/repositories/orgapacheant-1037/org/apache/ant/
This Vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
22nd March 2019 10:00 UTC.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For addit
Hi Stefan,
On 21/03/19 1:23 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2019-03-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
>> git tag:
>> ANT_1.10.6_RC1 on commit c3b75a72a78fd4cc1e1bd4bc345e5744872d44ef
> I think you've tagged the wrong commit (HEAD of master at that time
> rather than
Voting for this RC1 is now cancelled due to the issues that Stefan
found. I'll re-initiate a new RC for voting process soon.
-Jaikiran
On 21/03/19 1:23 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2019-03-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
>> git tag:
>> A
ion around these poms and this one in particular.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/f871e80a6a9f6165137d24b72e209a73283494e8#diff-da69e4ebd862444e205e118aa2aed802
[2]
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/f871e80a6a9f6165137d24b72e209a732
to the JDK version).
[1]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk12-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/11/
[2]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk13-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/11/
-Jaikiran
On 29/03/19 4:30 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
>
Hello Rory,
I just gave JDK 13 (build 18) a try with our master branch of Ant on a
Linux system and all seems fine[1] (no unexpected failures)
[1]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk13-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/13/
-Jaikiran
On 19/04/19 5:34 PM, Rory
e.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1038/org/apache/ant/
This Vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
5th May 2019 14:30 UTC.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For addit
+1
- Downloaded the .tar.gz binary.
- Used this version to build some of our internal projects
- Checked the NOTICE file
- Checked some random task manuals
All looks fine.
-Jaikiran
On 02/05/19 7:46 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've created a release candidate
With +1s from:
Stefan
Maarten
Jaikiran
and no vetos, this vote now passes.
I will proceed with the rest of the release formalities.
Thank you for voting.
-Jaikiran
On 07/05/19 9:45 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2019-05-02, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
>> I've created a release
en updated to mention that the remote listing of
files honours the followsymlinks attribute.
Bugzilla Report 63226
For complete information on Ant, including instructions on how to submit
bug reports, patches, or suggestions for improvement, see the Apache Ant
website:
https://ant.
instead of
discussing in the OpenJDK mailing list first.
-Jaikiran
On 10/05/19 1:18 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
>
> Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
>
>
> *OpenJDK builds *- JDK 13 - Early Access build 20 is available at
> http://jdk.java.net/13/
>
> * These early-access , op
Thank you Muneer.
-Jaikiran
On 10/05/19 4:33 PM, abdul.kolarku...@oracle.com wrote:
> Hi Jai,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> The bug you filed is a duplicate of
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223627 which is already
> resolved and we can expect fix in the
One of the steps that I couldn't complete during the 1.9.14 and 1.10.6
release was to update our Bugzilla to mark these versions as released
and create new versions for bug tracking.
Can one of us, who has admin rights in bugzilla, please do the necessary?
-Jai
Thank you Stefan.
-Jaikiran
On 10/05/19 6:40 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2019-05-10, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
>> Can one of us, who has admin rights in bugzilla, please do the necessary?
> Done
>
> Stefan
>
> ---
who might have been
planning to upgrade their setups to this released version, to wait for a
newer release, if you plan to use this version against Java 8. In the
meantime, you can still try out the 1.10.6 release and report any other
issues that you might run into.
-Jaikiran
signature.asc
On 24/05/19 9:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2019-05-24, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
>> As you all might know, we released Ant 1.10.6 some days back. That
>> release was built using Java 11 but targeted to be usable with Java 8
>> (our minimum requirement runtime that we sup
%201.8.0_121%20(unlimited%20security)%2064-bit%20Windows%20only,label_exp=Windows/894/testReport/junit/src.tests.antunit.taskdefs/get-test_xml/testTemporaryRedirect/
-Jaikiran
On 26/05/19 12:35 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Sorry the patch also contains another change, yesterday I up
quot;
> otherwise.
+1.
Given that the startup script already does a bunch of things to locate a
Java installation and the fact that what you are proposing seems to be
pretty reasonable in terms of finding the "Snap JVM", I think it
Hi Rory,
No issues uncovered for this build against our Ant project on a Linux
system.
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk13-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/16/
(Failures there are known failures).
-Jaikiran
On 16/06/19 11:10 AM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Rory,
No issues noticed with these 13 and 14 versions against a Linux CI job
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/18/
-Jaikiran
On 08/07/19 6:16 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
> Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
>
> **OpenJDK* 13 Early Access build **28 is now
er%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/19/jdk_axis=jdk13-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/
[2]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/19/jdk_axis=jdk14-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/
-Jaikiran
On 22/07/19 3:26 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
> Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
>
> Any issues to report on JDK 13 ,
)/20/jdk_axis=jdk14-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/
-Jaikiran
On 10/08/19 3:46 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
> Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
>
> *JDK 13 is now in the Release Candidate Phase - if you are aware of
> any issues, please let us know.
> *
>
> Per the JDK 13 schedule [1], we are no
om/apache/ant/commit/8f903513877e81e1c2e180c80c467f1ad71fc1d9
[2]
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/7b825e7c9600aa98156572bf8e83871f7e6bd911
[3]
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/4af231688855cfc59c11e24250852158b3eeb3f8
-Jaikiran
-
To unsu
Hi Martijn,
I've sent the reproducer in a private mail. I am not expecting a fix
today and neither do I plan to release immediately, so please take your
time to look into this - there's no rush.
-Jaikiran
On 25/08/19 1:10 PM, j...@apach.org wrote:
> Hi Jaikiran
>
>
201 - 300 of 760 matches
Mail list logo
