would the task help at all?
Vijay
Jeffrey E Care wrote:
"Peter Reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/02/2007 02:54:38
PM:
The easy way is to have a common.xml that is included in
by each subproject. The common.xml would have a "foo"
target with an empty implementation.
Any sub proje
hi,
There is an open source project called Parallel Junit
(https://parallel-junit.dev.java.net/). The idea is nice but the
developer has not provided an ant task for using this from an ant build.
Looking at the ant's junit task, it looks like we cannot easily
incorporate this without some chan
hi,
I know that there is already a parallel task. But...
We have a build file which goes something like this:
...
(I have omitted the unnecessary bits for this example)
Consider the scenario where the file transfer takes a long time: would
it be a good idea to have the copy/scp/ft
s worse than better.
Jeffrey E. (Jeff) Care
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM WebSphere Application Server
WAS Release Engineering
Vijay Aravamudhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/26/2008 02:36 PM
Please respond to
"Ant Developers List"
hi,
Jan: I can see your point, but with huge projects in which the final
artifacts are converted to exe's with a tool like Excelsior Jet, that
would not be an option. This is the same scenario where I am in right now.
Stefan: Yes - the copy task would be a poor example ie the presence of
an opt
hi,
I would like to unsubscribe from this list. I have tried multiple times
with the automated unsubscribe process - but it doesn't work. Please
remove me from this list.
thanks,
Vijay
On 09/22/2008 03:07 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Stefan Bodewig<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
