Re: [PATCH] Fix for VAJ4

2003-04-30 Thread Martin Landers
Hi Francois, hi Stefan, Stefan: I think we've found someone to confirm my patches! :) Francois: It seems your attachments were stripped... I've submitted a set of patches for the VAJ tasks - including the "import-patch" you mention - to this list a while ago. The reason the patches haven't made

RE: [PATCH] Fix for VAJ4

2003-05-02 Thread Martin Landers
sses - kind of a cleanroom implementation... ). Additionally I've added a small disclaimer in each class stating "It's not the ASF's fault" basically - someone might want to check this before putting the JAR to CVS... cu Martin -- {_{__}_} Martin Landers

Re: [PATCH] Fix for VAJ4

2003-05-02 Thread Martin Landers
have VAJ around anyway... If you feel the Bugzilla attachment may be seen as "distribution", just remove it. > As long as we distribute binaries, things should be fine, no? Yep, I think so. The binaries (and sources) for the tasks only contain references to the IBM classes, and I ho