Retry task container pt2

Hi all, Does anyone object to adding a retry task container to ant core? I've made a few alterations to the code I attached to the previous email. The only worry I have is if it's too 'workflowy', if you know what I mean. Kev ---

Sorry for the sandbox screw-up...

Hi all, Just tried to import from Idea - and yes I got it wrong (project or module which should I import...). So please try to ignore the vast amount of commits I've just made :( Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Retry task available in svn head

Hi all, Based on the feedback, I modified the task a little (only support 1 nested task) and threw together some doc. Please -1 if you think this is unsuitable/broken/smells funny Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P

Re: Retry task available in svn head

Hi Jan, If the nested task does not fail, the loop must be finished. +public void execute() throws BuildException { +for(int i=0; i<=retryCount; i++) { +try { +nestedTask.perform(); yes there should be a break; here - I will update as soon as eclipse has

Re: How to contribute an optional Ant task (ccfindmerge)?

I thought that maybe other Ant/ClearCase users out there could use this task too, so I would like to contribute CCFindmerge to the Apache Ant codebase. However, I am not quite sure about how to go about it (sorry, it's my first time here). No worries. I have read the instructions at http://www

Re: Retry task available in svn head

Hi Jan, Would this be more useful? public void execute() throws BuildException { StringBuffer errorMessages = new StringBuffer(); for(int i=0; i<=retryCount; i++) { try { nestedTask.perform(); break; } catch (Exception

Re: svn commit: r537344 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/ResourceContains.java

Hi Matt, > > we already had this covered, e.g.: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > xmlns="antlib:org.apache.tools.ant.types.resources.selectors" > > /> > > > > > > > > Note that this approach supports any resource type > > right off the bat. Actually with the suggested > "add" > > id

Re: svn commit: r540498 - /ant/sandbox/antlibs/debian/trunk/

Hi, You may want to look here too: http://vafer.org/projects/jdeb/ I wasn't aware of this particular project, but checking it over now, I think the scope of the one in the sandbox is larger. I'm aiming for full control over building/installing/verifying etc, indeed as many of the dpkg options

Re: svn commit: r540498 - /ant/sandbox/antlibs/debian/trunk/

But maybe you could get feedback or help from that developer. Of course I'll be in touch regarding it. Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn commit: r540950 - in /ant: core/trunk/dist/ core/trunk/dist/lib/ sandbox/antlibs/debian/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/debian/ sandbox/antlibs/debian/trunk/src/tests/antunit/

On 5/24/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ;) I assumed that was accidental and removed them. -Matt --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why are you adding the dist and dist/lib directories > to > source code code, they should only get > created as part of the build process.

Re: svn commit: r540498 - /ant/sandbox/antlibs/debian/trunk/

Kevin Jackson wrote: >> But maybe you could get feedback or help from that developer. > > Of course I'll be in touch regarding it. FYI Torsten is an ASF member. I knew he had an apache email address, I've used one of his maven2 plugins previously. And he's also

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

Hi, Yep, the test looks incorrect: Sorry, my mistake - when I tested on windows I got a clean build, problem is that this test doesn't run on windows as the init-test4 prevents it (Windows XP == dos, I thought it would be NT?) I'll commit fix. Kev ---

LocationLogger

Hi, I've just had time to play around with this : http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32897 It seems to work quite well producing the desired output etc. Any problems putting this in 1.7.1? Anyone else had chance to try it out (especially those who use emacs to properly test the

jsch-0.1.30+ & ant scp tasks

Hi all, I've been tracking down a strange bug for most of this morning. Here's my build.xml (snippets) macro to make ssh/scp easier:

Re: jsch-0.1.30+ & ant scp tasks

Hi (sorry didn't get back to this earlier), I knew that ssh on ant1.7.0 and jsch1.30 hung, but I thought it had been fixed in Ant in SVN_HEAD. Are you saying its still there? It definitely hangs for me using svn trunk + any of the jsch 0.1.30+ jars. Note I'm not recompiling ant everytime agai

jsch-0.1.30+ & ant scp tasks

Hi all, Just to confirm that this isn't an issue - I was using an older version of the code than I thought I was. Sorry for the confusion. Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Debian package creator task

Hi, I started working on a task that allows you to create Debian packages, pure Java implementation. You should be able to create deb packages in your build scripts running on Windows. It seems to be the latest fad - make debian packaging tasks :) I've started on an antlib for creating/instal

Re: tar task and symlinks

Hi, see: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40059 Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Overriding a core task with taskdef

Hi all, I'd like to be able to do So that I can define where to load the ant-javamail.jar and mail.jar from. This works fine for the SSHExec and Scp tasks, but not with EmailTask. Is there a fundamental difference here? Kev ---

Classloader problems

Hi all, For obscure reasons, I have to redefine the core email task using a taskdef. This is my build file: Now the strange thing is that thescp & sshexec tasks report that they have been over-ridden by the new definitions, and

Re: Classloader problems

Hi, I was supprised that the you described worked for scp, I think that you have removed the ant-jsch.jar from from $ANT_HOME/lib. Yes as the classloader will find the ant-jsch.jar iin $ANT_HOME/lib and try to load the jsch code from there. I moved it to a different location and worked fine

Re: Classloader problems

Hi, This means that the moving ant-email.jar from $ANT_HOME/lib will not work. The EmailTask code could be modified to allow a classpath element to be used to load the MimeMailer class (with junittask like classloader tricks), Yes I looked at seeing if re-writing the EmailTask to include some

Re: Classloader problems

Hi, Initially I was thinking of using a separate classloader for ant tasks/types (I cannot find the e-mail or bugzilla entry), but currently I do not think that this is necessary as: - I do not think that more 3th class dependent optional tasks will be added to ant core (they will be adde

Task for substringing?

Hi all, In the project I'm working on I have a need to be able to substring an expanded property value ${new} -> 23 Is there a way of achieving this already? Looking through the manual I don't see a way of doing this without using scriptdef + script language du jour and for my current proje

Re: Task for substringing?

Hi all, > If there currently isn't a way of achieving this, > then I can put > something together for it (and get paid for it :) Well yesterday I was sick as a dog, but tuesday night I hacked together a very simple substring task (with antunit tests) on the off-chance that there wasn't a simpl

PropertyHelper thoughts

Hi all, After throwing together a quick hack to support my substring properties use case, Matt suggested instead significant changes to the property helper class. After looking through the code this afternoon here are my thoughts on a possible way to implement a configurable propertyHelper 1 -

Re: svn antlib status

> Do you think it is time to cut a beta? Honestly, I've never used it myself outside of its unit tests, so I have no idea whether it is in a really usable state (I'd think it is, though). This was one of the most requested tasks/antlibs from our uses (amongst them other apache projects), some

Fwd: [ANN] bee 0.4.0 Released

Bee, a ruby homage of ant... -- Forwarded message -- From: Michel Casabianca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jun 26, 2007 11:09 AM Subject: [ANN] bee 0.4.0 Released To: ruby-talk ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bee is a build tool running YAML files. These build files have a clean syntax à la

Fwd: svn commit: r550807 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW contributors.xml

I get an i18n/encoding problem for this commit - anyone else see the same thing? Kev -- Forwarded message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jun 26, 2007 2:57 PM Subject: svn commit: r550807 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW contributors.xml To: [EMAIL

PropertyHelper patch & property changes

Hi all, I'm just testing out the props antlib. First, it looks like it will be perfect for my usecase, ta Matt ;) Second, is the patch at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42736 divisive? If this was a simple antlib, then I could start using it straight away, but as it requires

Re: PropertyHelper patch & property change

My understanding of the current situation wrt my work so far: - Peter has looked at the code. - There is an overall vote of between +0 and +1 for this work. - The work is a breaking change for current users of PH functionality. Ok, from me a +1 as it meets my requirements (although I'm still

Props Antlib

Hi all, I've just got the props antlib working within my odd usecase. I'm using mvn + antrun plugin and I've installed the patched version of ant and the props antlib. Then in a parent pom, I've got the complete etc setup for the property helper ie I munge the property with a regexp (very

Re: Vote: Proposed removal of the ant-type attribute

+1 deprecate for 1.7.1 if no-one dissents Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ant 1.7.1 - what about a release soon?

Hi all, We mentioned previously that we should get a release of fixes/enhancements out around the june mark (~6months on from 1.7.0). Well we're late :) Does anyone have anything that would definitely need us to hold back a release in the next 3-4 weeks? I'd love to have the debian stuff ready

Re: [SUBMIT] sshsession task

Hi, [snip desc] This sounds very handy, and a real solution to ssh tunneling for ant. > In the attached tgz of an svn diff, please find SSHSession.java, > sshsession.html, and mods to defaults.properties and optionaltasklist.html As you may have already noticed, attachments are stripped form th

Re: [VOTE] Weblogic and Starteam antlibs for ant 1.8.0

Hi all, Move to anlibs +1 from me. Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Ben Burgess as committer

> > I would like to propose Ben Burgess as a committer +1 kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Presentation for Ossummit Hong Kong

Hi, My proposal for a talk/presentation in Hong Kong has been accepted, so now I have to plan what to talk about :) Last time I spent almost the entire presentation talking about writing and testing custom ant tasks. This time I want to incorporate some of that older material, but to also spend

Re: Need Help with Ant Pass fail notification!

> Hi, > > I am beginner in ant. > > I am trying to write one program in ant- which will save Pass/fail > Notification in one text file. Could you help me please? ant [target] | file.txt use pipes to save the build output to a text file, to get just the BUILD SUCCESSFUL/FAILED use ant [target] |

Mylyn

Hi all, Not sure how many eclipse users there are on here, but I thought I'd pass this along if anyone is interested. I've had a play with the Mylyn plugin for eclipse, and the ability to view bugzilla reports inside eclipse, make a change, commit change, and close an issue all within the same to

Re: Planned to add sshexec path for ant 1.7.1?

Hi, I use the SSH tasks on a daily basis and I don't experience the behaviour noted in the bug rep. That said the patch makes sense and I'm just testing now (if I experience no problems, I'll commit the change) > The patch looks fine (check for close and not eof), but I would defer to Rob > to

Release manager for 1.7.1

Hi all, It's time to get a bug-fix release out, and again today we're getting messages from the user list asking for 1.7.1. I volunteer to be release manager (but would like an experienced hand to back me up procedurally and with svn branching etc). Also need to decide if the issue Steve has dis

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Ivy as a subproject of Ant

Hi, > [X ] Yes, I think the Ivy podling is ready to graduate as a subproject of Ant As an interested 3rd party, not as a anyone with a vote worth anything in Ivy terms :) Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Ivy as subproject of Ant

Hi, > The Ivy community has voted [1] for becoming a subproject of Ant. > Should we accept Ivy as subproject? Which means that we will share the > ACL and have similar access rights to subversion. > Our initial thought [2] when we starting mentoring Ivy in the Incubator > was accepting. But maybe t

Cannot run ant test target on svn trunk

Hi all, Tried to run a single test with: ant -Djunit.testcase=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.ssh.ScpTest junit-single-test And I'm getting a failure with: Buildfile: build.xml prepare: check_for_optional_packages: build: [copy] Copying 2 files to D:\eclipse\workspace\ant-core-tr

propose 1.7.1 bug fix release

Hi, I'd like to propose a timetable for the release of 1.7.1. We know that the users are waiting for several important fixes that are already in trunk, and I think we should try to release as soon as we can. Following the release instructions :), I suggest that we start to cut a beta the week be

OT: C projects for students?

Hi, This is totally not Ant related (although it's slightly Apache related). If you're not interested sorry to waste your time. I'm teaching C to university students this semester and I'd like to set them some practical work to actually implement bugfixes and provide patches to open source proje

Re: AntUnit enhancements

Hi, > I see you've applied the patch I submitted for a bug I wrote up on AntUnit > (bug > 43466--http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43466). Yes, I'm trying to close out issues on bugzilla right now. > I have some other enhancements that I'll be writing up in Bugzilla in the > com

Re: propose 1.7.1 bug fix release

Hi, (this is going to 'sound' fairly dumb) > Is there anything we've added to the 1.8.x branch that should be moved > over? The big project logger is the main thing I've added; I love this > for big ivy-managed builds where lots of things get run > -it prints the project name of every target >

Re: svn commit: r585108 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/XSLTProcess.java

> Tell me how to merge stuff in SVN and I will try! I just copied'n'pasted :( apparently svn 1.5 will have easier merging than currently[1] http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79 I've been playing with git recently and I'm very very impressed by it's performance - cloning the entire linux kerne

Re: svn commit: r586283 - /ant/core/branches/ANT_17_BRANCH/build.xml

Hi, > Kev--I don't get it. The ANTLR task isn't compatible > with Antlr 3, though a compatible version is available > at antlr.org . Did I miss something? Sorry, I was getting all dependencies for the build and just downloaded the latest antlr (3). When the build failed I noticed that it was a

Re: publish git repo of ant-trunk?

Hi, > I would like to try it. Are you going to import the whole history or just > the last revision? Depending on the situation regarding hosting. If we can host a new repo on asf hardware, and infrastructure aren't worried about running a time-consuming initial import, then I'd say the whole his

publish git repo of ant-trunk?

Hi all, I'd like to propose that we publish a git repository of our svn repo as a trial. Obviously this will require some support from infrastructure to sanction the svn->git initial import. * Why? - svn + patch + bugzilla is less than optimal (but better than JIRA :) - git merge/branches == sup

Re: publish git repo of ant-trunk?

> As long as we don't do it on ASF hardware, why not. Why can't we use ASF hardware? I was thinking of using people.apache.org to host - hence why infrastructure would need to be involved > I've started to use darcs myself, I like it better (less hype being > the main reason, I guess), but I'm o

Re: [VOTE] Merge Ivy and Ant Dev Lists

> > Should we merge [EMAIL PROTECTED] into [EMAIL PROTECTED] and likewise > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] into the new [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > +1 +1 Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Bugs in release branch

Hi, On Windows with JDK6, the following tests fail: FileUtilsTest.testHasErrorInCase() RmicAdvancedTest.testXnew RmicAdvancedTest.testXnewForked Error org.apache.xerces.parsers.XIncludeAwareParserConfiguration cannot be cast to org.apache.xerces.xni.parser.XMLParserConfiguration RmicAdvance

Re: AW: Eclipse still using Ant 1.6.5 because of bug in Ant 1.7.0

Hi Jan, > I got no answer, so maybe you havent got my mail. > Did you recieve that? Maybe it was blocked because of my zip-attachement. > > Jan > >I have created mock classes for (most of) the external > >classes. Sure, original classes would be better ;) > >I thought about putting them sources to

1.7.1 Beta?

Hi all, It's been a few weeks since I uploaded the alpha of 1.7.1. I think we can produce a beta this/next week I get clean builds on Windows XP: java 1.4 java 1.5 java 1.6 Linux (Ubuntu Gutsy): java 1.5 (clean) java 1.6 (XMLCatalog fails ./build.sh test, but works fine when ant -f src/etc/test

Re: Ant Documentation

Hi, > I've noticed that many newcomers are offered unit testing and > documentation as good places to start. This works out for me, because > I'm a huge believer in good documentation. > > If I'm browsing the repository correctly, it looks like the manual is > written in HTML. I think it would b

Re: AW: ant java versions

Hi all, > To me, the super-compelling reason is that if we claim to support Java > 1.3, then we have to make sure to test against it on all supported > platforms. This is a lot of extra work (on top of the testing for 1.4, > 1.5, and 1.6), particularly if none of us has Java 1.3 installed. This >

Re: AW: ant java versions

Hi, > Strange that there are deprecated warnings even on 1.3 ... > But the build works :) I'm pretty sure that the tests don't though :( Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: checking task configuration

Hi, > I prefer collecting all configuration errors and reporting them at once > over throwing a BuildException for each error. Ok Ant is not a GUI > I implemented a helper class for that - is it worth to introduce that > into Ant Core? > I have no problem unless you want it in 1.7.1, trunk is

1.7.1 Status

Hi all, Had a bit of a hectic Christmas period (and it's Tet next week too!) So far: Ubuntu Gutsy: - Java 1.5: 1.7.1 all tests pass - Java 1.6.0_3 1.7.1 XMLCatalogTest fails Windows XP SP2: - Java 1.6.0_2 1.7.1 FileUtilsTest.testHasErrorInCase fails (this may be related to the createTempFile ch

1.7.1 Status Update :)

Hi, Final testing on Windows XP SP2: - Java 5 FileUtils.testHasErrorInCase fails - Java 1.4 FileUtils.testHasErrorInCase fails - Java 1.3 doesn't build as the activation.jar is compiled with 1.4 (blame Sun for that) Thanks, Kev

Re: [VOTE] add Nicolas Lalevée as committer

Hi, sorry this is a little late: +1 from me, I still need to check out Ivy properly :( hopefully this year I'll have the time. Oh and happy Tet (happy lunar new year - year of the rat). (chuc mung nam moi, mau ty) Kev - To unsub

Re: Merging rev 628990 to the 1.7.x branch

Hi Stefan, > Is it OK if I merge > into the 1.7.x > branch before we release 1.7.1 (maybe even before Kev creates the RC > build, but I'd like to have his opinion here first). I've been following the discussion and was waiting until a patch/

Re: Merging rev 628990 to the 1.7.x branch

Hi, > I will cooperate to you in 100% and will test the RC. I still have a > question. > When is the RC planned to be released? And also, when is the next release > of Ant 1.7.1 planned to be released? At the moment I need to retest with the latest patch merged back into the 1.7.1 branch So a ro

Re: Merging rev 628990 to the 1.7.x branch

Hi, > Do you want me to do the merge or are you going to do that yourself? I've got the code copied across - though the merge tool didn't so I had to do it manually. I don't suppose this matters but I'd like to know why svn merge did nowt Kev --

Re: Fix for 44323

Hi, > I noticed 1.7.1 is coming up. > > How do I get this patch committed? Is this something that I am supposed > to do myself? I can commit the patch to trunk (1.8.x), but I won't let further changes go into 1.7.1 You mention a workaround in your bug report of using the complete path when cal

1.7.1 test results

Hi, Last night I merged the JunitTask changes into the 1.7.1 branch and tested on windows: WindowsXP & JDK6 & JDK5 & JDK4 - FileUtils.testHasErrorInCase failed (this is strange as it shouldn't even run on windows I don't think) This morning on Ubuntu gutsy: Ubuntu Gutsy (7:10) & JDK5 - no failu

Re: Merging rev 628990 to the 1.7.x branch

Hi Stefan, > > I've got the code copied across - though the merge tool didn't so I > > had to do it manually. I don't suppose this matters but I'd like to > > know why svn merge did nowt > > Looking at your commit, you merged a bit more than just my patch from > trunk. My guess is that my p

1.7.1 - Beta Vote

Hi, As I mentioned previously (although I'm a couple of days late). I'd like to release a beta of 1.7.1 within the next two weeks. The current 1.7.1 trunk is now locked for further changes (99.9% test completion on the most troublesome platform (windows)) The beta of 1.7.1 is ready: [x] yes (+1

Ant 1.7.1 release plan [RESULT]

Hi, After waiting a couple of weeks, in case anyone wanted to veto the release plan. We have 6 +1 0 -1 So (although it's not a large mandate), I'm now going to mail a release vote Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE

[VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta

Hi all, I think it's time to go ahead and push out 1.7.1 for wider testing. I really *don't* want to add any changes to code at the moment, but if there are any documentation issues that someone notices I'm willing to let them in on a case by case basis Over to the vote: Despite the strange bug

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta

Hi, > Any reason why you can't create a key for yourself? My key isn't counter-signed so anything I sign will be 'untrusted' :( Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ant 1.7.1beta available

Hi all, I've uploaded a signed complete distribution of 1.7.1beta to: http://people.apache.org/~kevj/ant/ant-1.7.1beta.tar.gz It weighs in at ~50mb NB. I'm now up to #10 in the ReleaseInstructions, 11 seems easy enough, but " 12. Once this is uploaded, unpack things, create the release director

Re: svn commit: r636602 - /ant/core/branches/ANT_17_BRANCH/docs/manual/credits.html

> > --- ant/core/branches/ANT_17_BRANCH/docs/manual/credits.html (original) > > +++ ant/core/branches/ANT_17_BRANCH/docs/manual/credits.html > > > - Antoine Lévy-Lambert > > + Antoine L�vy-Lambert > > > - Jan Matèrne > > + Jan Mat�rne Damn! Sorry, do you know what encoding I should

Re: svn commit: r636602 - /ant/core/branches/ANT_17_BRANCH/docs/manual/credits.html

> > Sorry, do you know what encoding I should be using to fix > > this problem? > > No, sorry. I dont see any encoding in my HEAD version (the old one). > In XML I use usually ISO-8859-1 > As this is HTML we could use the named entities? HTML is designed for viewed > by humans by its rendered

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta

Hi, > so what? > > If I signed it, then a few signatures would be on my key but for the > majority of users there wouldn't be a trust path from them to my key. > > It is better to have signatures on your key, that's sure (and that is > something we can get arranged even without meeting F2F),

Re: Ant 1.7.1beta available

Hi, > I'm sorry I didn't catch this earlier but we seem to be in conflict > with the policies of which license or notice information should go > into which file. > > My current understanding (from hanging out on the ASF's legal mailing > list, not from actually understanding any legalese, muc

Re: Ant 1.7.1beta available

Hi, > I see that you have updated the beta (to 2). > http://people.apache.org/~kevj/ant/ant-1.7.1beta2.tar.gz > Peter Yes, in the old beta I had made a mess of some documentation (egrave eacute) and Stefan had noticed that the license files were incorrect - I thought that there were enough cha

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Ant 1.7.1beta2 public availability

Hi all, Ant 1.7.1beta2 is now available for wider public testing! - http://people.apache.org/dist/ant/v1.7.1beta2/ Please see release notes for major changes from ant 1.7.0. Ant 1.7.1 includes some support for Java6 features: - JavaFX scripting support for - secureinput inputhandler (non-echoi

[Vote] 1.7.1beta2

Hi, I've been informed (on the q.t) that I never actually requested a vote before announcing that the ant 1.7.1 beta tarballs were available. So officially at the moment, the tarballs on people.apache.org that I announced are beta-in-potentia :( A retrospective vote on these tarballs has been pr

Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

Hi, Sorry I'm late with this. > IMHO the bug is serious enough to be fixed in 1.7.1 final and should > be merged into the branch. I'm happy to merge this into 1.7.1 and run a 3rd beta cycle (test, push tarballs, vote etc) if it's a show-stopper for many people Kev ---

[Vote - release 1.7.1 beta] - results

Hi all, Well after a suitably long time for results to trickle in, the beta of 1.7.1 has +1 : 7 -1 : 0 So I guess it was retroactively deemed to be a release (phew!) Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addition

Re: [Vote - release 1.7.1 beta] - results

Hi Antoine, > do we not need to do some further checkins in SVN so that the output of ant > -version changes from > > Apache Ant version 1.7.1beta compiled on March 18 2008 > > to > > Apache Ant version 1.7.1 compiled on April xy 2008 ? > > which means creating a new label and new binaries a

Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

Hi, > Note that according to recent discussions on the subject, we will most > likely drop the use of 'id' on the task used to load the settings (which > will probably be 'configure' again, since I seem to be the only one who > don't like using configure where we have make a lot of effort to d

Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

Hi, > The problem showed up as a symptom in Ivy but Ivy isn't the only one > affected by it. I'm all in favor of merging the change regardless. The change to UnknownElement is now merged back into BRANCH_17 I will test on windows/ubuntu at some point this week - then I suppose a further vote

1.7.1 + patch => failures

Hi, I'm getting the following failures (Ubuntu Hardy Heron, 1-7-1 trunk, java6): testRedirector13Failure unexpected log content expected:<...ec/exec.xml ERROR!!![]/home/kev/workspace/...> but was:<...ec/exec.xml ERROR!!![error at LeadPipeInputStream.read(): Pipe broken]/home/kev/workspace

Re: Adding magic properties for targets?

Hi, > Colm's patch in > adds two > new magic properties, one for the build's default target and one for > the targets specified on the command line (or via <*ant*>). > > IIRC such properties have been suggested many moons ago and rejected,

1.7.7 DOMUtilTest fixed

Hi, I finally got the time to work out what was wrong with the DOMUtilTest failure I should have some time to look into the other failures for 1.7.1 - but this was the only new failure since the last beta release I would like to start the process for the full release since the beta has been avai

Re: Issue 45190 and Ant 1.7.1

Hi Stefan, > I fixed https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45190 with > a rather trivial patch > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=668624 and now the > reporter asks whether this could go into 1.7.1. > > While I understand that he needs the bug fixed, I also wouldn't want

Re: Issue 45190 and Ant 1.7.1

Hi all, Since there seems to be a bit of a debate on the acceptance of late patches in the beta cycle, we should probably have a vote --- Do you think that a patch which *seems* like a trivial fix and has been accepted into SVN HEAD should be backported/merged into the current 'about to be release

Re: Issue 45190 and Ant 1.7.1

> If you feel you'd need a new beta, than I'd vote against including the > patch. I'd be +0 for including it without another beta. > >> (PS sorry about being slow getting 1.7.1 out, > > Just in case I've been misunderstood. When I said that in retrospect > we should have released 1.7.1 earlier I

[VOTE] 1.7.1 Release now available for final testing

Hi all, There is an additional folder at http://people.apache.org/dist/ant/v1.7.1/ This is the src/bin that will become the final 1.7.1 release unless there are any vetos I've done the download + check signature test and it seems fine to me Vote The distribution files on http://people.apa

Re: State of 1.7.1 release

Hi, > with Kev, Martijn and myself we have three PMC members vote +1 on the > release. Given that Kev is moving across half of the planet, I'm > finishing the release process for him. Thanks for stepping in Stefan, > So far the release files are in place and the Ant site has been > updated at t

Re: AntUnit 1.1?

> ant's trunk has been using a snapshot of AntUnit's trunk for quite > some time now, so we seem to need some unreleased feature. How about > making it available to others as well? Sounds reasonable. Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Bug 36901

Hi all, After an extended haitus, I finally have more time for working through patches/bugs in bugzilla. Bug 36901[1] involves a patch submission to allow properties to retain their formatting and comments when being written by PropertyFile. Anyone have an opinion on this patch before I commit c

Re: Perforce Sync

Hi, > BUILD FAILED > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/oro/text/perl/Perl5Util This is more of a user list question, but it looks to me like you're missing a dependency for p4sync http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/perforce.html This page explains that you need the oro jar on yo

Re: How to automize Ant

Hi, > I have downloaded the cruisecontrol.I have cvs.Can you let me know what > should i do next or can you give me any documentation on it.Please guide me. You're asking setup/config questions about continuous integration on the ant developer list. It's not really an appropriate forum for these

  1   2   3   4   >