Re: JDK 12 & JMC 7.0.0 Early Access builds are available

Hi Rory, On 07/09/18 2:58 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote: > > > Can you confirm the fix in JDK 12 b09, thanks ? > > > *FOSS bug fixes in recent builds.* > >  * *Apache Ant - >    **JDK-8209965**(b09)* I gave the JDK 12 EA version a try: java -version

Re: ant-ivy git commit: Update the release notes

ion), and > DefaultRepositoryCacheManager. There's no uniformity in > Resource-implementing classes either, sometimes getName() works on an URI, > sometimes a path string. > > Gintas > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 08:34, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> More of a FYI - I'm s

Re: ant git commit: Check spelling

Things haven't changed (nor do I expect any changes anymore). To say the least - it's followed the same pattern: - do changes like these - when requested not to do such changes, argue over it and move it to some abstract discussion - then give an impression it won't be repeated - few days down

Re: ant git commit: Check spelling

.com/apache/ant/commit/54b6df2f44c5cb4f9573f99330c2d2908f1bf506 -Jaikiran On 11/09/18 12:17 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > How was this different from PR #66? > > Gintas > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 06:55, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> Things haven't changed (nor

Re: new release

Hi Simon, On 11/09/18 3:40 PM, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote: > I know of at least > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62621 > > was fixed, by you (thanks!), was this the only one? There have been other bug fixes too, but I wasn't sure if you were interested in some other unresolved iss

Re: p2.mirrorsURL and p2-mirrors--xml.cgi causing problems on update site

Hello Basil, Sorry about the delayed response. I did notice your other mail in the user mailing list. Unfortunately I'm not an expert in this area, so haven't been able to respond sooner. I don't yet have an answer/fix for you, but I'm now looking into this and will seek some help from others. -J

Re: Java 11 Compatibility Problem

I agree with Stefan, at the moment I recommend ignoring those warnings. There isn't anything else we can do (other than removing support for pack200, which isn't a good option). -Jaikiran On 10/10/18 9:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi Krzysztof > > I'm not actively working on Ivy so take my res

Re: AW: Java 11 Compatibility Problem

warning comes when analyzing the > code. > Not just running Ivy. > So the normal user won't see the warning. Maybe we should implement a warning? > > Jan > >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: Jaikiran Pai [mailto:jaiki...@apache.org] >> Gese

Re: Tests in Surefire

Could you tell us a bit more about what is being attempted? Are you saying you plan to run the tests that are part of the Ant project, through the mvn command, while building Ant? -Jaikiran On 20/10/18 3:31 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > I believe that in order to execute Ant test suite in S

Re: ant git commit: bz-62890 Make sure the sync task considers the case sensitivity of the destination directory's filesystem while looking for orphan files to delete

Hi Stefan, On 12/11/18 11:26 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2018-11-08, wrote: > >> +private static final Map fileSystemCaseSensitivity >> = new HashMap<>(); > I understand it may be expensive to determine whether a filesystem is > case-sensitive, but I'm a bit hesitant about the cache as it

Re: [VOTE] move over to gitbox.apache.org

+1 for the move. -Jaikiran On 07/12/18 10:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all > > as indicated by Daniel we'll have to mover over sooner rather than later > anyway. So we may better do so now with no release in sight. > > Any objections or do we want to go ahead? > > Stefan > > ---

Re: ant git commit: bz-62952 Make AntClassLoader multi-release jar aware when it deals with java.util.jar.JarFile

Hi Stefan, On 09/12/18 3:18 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2018-12-05, wrote: > >> Repository: ant >> Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/master ac46ff190 -> 593aff2d2 > >> bz-62952 Make AntClassLoader multi-release jar aware when it deals with >> java.util.jar.JarFile > An alternative approach t

Re: [RESULT] move over to gitbox.apache.org

On 17/12/18 2:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I will take care of Gump, if anybody else could look into Jenkins that > would be great. I'll take a look at the Jenkins jobs later tonight and update them as necessary. -Jaikiran

Antlib SVN and antunit Java versions

While looking at some of our Jenkins jobs, to reconfigure them to use gitbox (wherever necessary), I notice that there are 2 jobs[1][2] which are for Antlib SVN and Antunit libraries. Both these jobs are configure for JDK 5, because those projects target Java 5 as the minimal runtime. However, the

Re: Antlib SVN and antunit Java versions

On 19/12/18 11:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2018-12-18, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> One option in similar cases that we have employed in other jobs is to >> configure the Java system property -Dhttps.protocols to "TLSv1.2". But >> this version of TLS is only

[VOTE] Retire Antlib SVN

This is a proposal to retire the "Antlib SVN" library[1]. The project hasn't seen any new development for many years now[2]. Retiring this will reduce the work necessary to maintain it[3] (Jekins jobs etc...). More about retiring a project or a project component can be found here[4]. [1] http://

Re: [VOTE] Retire Antlib SVN

An implicit +1. -Jaikiran On 22/12/18 7:39 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > This is a proposal to retire the "Antlib SVN" library[1]. The project > hasn't seen any new development for many years now[2]. Retiring this > will reduce the work necessary to maintain it[3] (Jekin

Commit notifications from gitbox [was [ant] branch master updated (706d818 -> 722ccb7)]

Adding us...@infra.apache.org. Comments inline. On 21/12/18 1:01 AM, bode...@apache.org wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > bodewig pushed a change to branch master > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ant.git. > > > from 706d818 mov

Re: [RESULT] move over to gitbox.apache.org

On 17/12/18 2:25 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2018-12-17, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> On 17/12/18 2:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >>> I will take care of Gump, if anybody else could look into Jenkins that >>> would be great. >> I'll take a look at the Jenk

Re: [ant] branch master updated: Update JSCh (see http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ChangeLog)

Hi Stefan, Thank you for reminding me of those files. I have now pushed a commit in both the branches which updates these files to use the new version. -Jaikiran On 27/12/18 3:04 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi Jaikiran > > you should probably also update manual/install.html as well as the > affe

Re: JDK 12 Early Access build 26 & JDK 13 Early Access builds available

Hi Rory, On 04/01/19 3:30 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Happy New Year! > > *OpenJDK builds *- JDK 12 Early Access build 26 is available at > http://jdk.java.net/12/ > Initial run of this EA 26 build on a Linux system has shown no issues in the Ant project. I haven't had a chance to t

New release?

It's been some months now since our last 1.9.x and 1.10.x Ant releases. During that period, we have added some good number of fixes and enhancements to both these versions upstream. Some of the users (in bugzilla discussions) have asked if we can do a release sooner to get these fixes. As far as I

[RESULT] [VOTE] Retire Antlib SVN

With +1s from Jan, Stefan (and implicitly) me and no other votes, this vote has passed. I'll start the process of retiring this project. -Jaikiran On 22/12/18 10:51 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2018-12-22, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> This is a proposal to retire the "Antli

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Retire Antlib SVN

thing else pending. [1] http://ant.apache.org/processes.html -Jaikiran On 22/01/19 7:27 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > With +1s from Jan, Stefan (and implicitly) me and no other votes, this > vote has passed. I'll start the process of retiring this project. > > -Jaikiran > > On 22/1

Re: JDK 12 enters Rampdown Phase Two

Hi Rory, On 21/01/19 4:45 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote: >  Hi Stefan/Jaikiran, > > **OpenJDK builds *- JDK 12 Early Access build 28 **is now available > **at : - jdk.java.net/12/* > Our testsuite on Linux with this EA version of of JDK 12 has passed fine without issues. Haven't had a chance to test on

Re: JDK 12 enters Rampdown Phase Two

Hi Dalibor, On 23/01/19 2:51 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > > > On 23.01.2019 08:56, Jaikiran Pai wrote: >> Our Ant testsuite against this EA version of JDK 13 has passed fine on >> Linux. However, one of our other projects within the Ant umbrella has >> shown an is

Re: How to commit?

Hi Craig, Commits to the repository are only allowed for committers of the project. For contributing patches (like this one), you can use the github pull request process. Once reviewed, the merge will then be done by one of the existing project committers and the contribution will be credited to y

Re: JDK 12: First Release Candidate available

Hello Rory, Our testsuite, of the master branch of Ant, has come up clean for both the JDK 12 build 32[1] and JDK 13 build EA 8[2]. These initial test runs are only against Linux setup and one of these days I'll run these tests against Windows as well. In the next few days, I'll run some of our ot

Re: JDK 12 enters Rampdown Phase Two

Java 13 (even the latest EA 8 build). -Jaikiran On 23/01/19 7:00 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Hi Dalibor, > > On 23/01/19 2:51 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: >> >> On 23.01.2019 08:56, Jaikiran Pai wrote: >>> Our Ant testsuite against this EA version of JDK 13 has passed fine

Re: 2.5.0 Release

Hello James, Sorry, I didn't respond earlier. The only thing that's stopping me from releasing 2.5.0 is IVY-1580 issue. I will send out a mail this week to dev list to explain what that issue is and what are our options on getting past it. Once we have a decision, I'll go ahead with a release prop

Re: [ant] branch master updated: Incorrect HTML

Hi Eugène, I have updated that manual and also marked this bugzilla as resolved. Thanks for bringing this up. -Jaikiran On 06/03/19 12:50 PM, Eugène Adell wrote: > Hello Jaikiran, > > if you are changing the doc, there's one bug that I opened a couple of > days ago ( https://bz.apache.org/bugz

[VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.14 based on RC1

Hello all, I've created a new release candidate for 1.9.14. This release contains bug fixes as well as some enhancements. Release notes:          https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/RELEASE-NOTES-1.9.14.html git tag: ANT_1914_RC1 on commit: 8ec8ecf4eb94b238b09161055e75508155040180

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.14 based on RC1

+1 - Downloaded the .tar.gz binary - Installed the new 1.9.14 release. - Checked some manuals. - Used this version to build some internal projects. All went fine. -Jaikiran On 12/03/19 3:32 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Hello all, > > I've created a new release candidate fo

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.14 based on RC1

On 14/03/19 11:31 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > I noticed two problems. > > * the NOTICE still hasn't been updated for 2019 - fixed in both branches > > * one file lacked the ASF required license header, and has lacked it for > more than a year - fixed in both branches > > Neither is a reason t

[RESULT] Release Ant 1.9.14 based on RC1

Hi all, With +1s from Maarten, Stefan and me (implicit) and no other votes, this vote has passed. I'll start the rest of the release process. Thank you for voting. -Jaikiran On 12/03/19 3:32 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Hello all, > > I've created a new release candidate for 1

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.9.14 released

The Apache Ant Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.9.14. Apache Ant is a Java library and command-line tool that helps building software. The Apache Ant team currently maintains two lines of development. The 1.9.x releases require Java5 at runtime and 1.10.x requires Java8 at

[VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.6 based on RC1

Hello all, I've created a release candidate for 1.10.6. This release contains bug fixes as well as enhancements. The release was generated using JDK 11 version (to include JDK9+ features/tasks). The minimal required version of Java runtime, to use this Ant release, still remains Java 8. Release

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.6 based on RC1

Hi Stefan, On 21/03/19 1:23 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2019-03-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> git tag: >>     ANT_1.10.6_RC1 on commit c3b75a72a78fd4cc1e1bd4bc345e5744872d44ef > I think you've tagged the wrong commit (HEAD of master at that time > rather than

[CANCELLED] Release Ant 1.10.6 based on RC1

Voting for this RC1 is now cancelled due to the issues that Stefan found. I'll re-initiate a new RC for voting process soon. -Jaikiran On 21/03/19 1:23 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2019-03-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> git tag: >>     A

Need inputs before starting a new RC for 1.10.6

After releasing the (now aborted) RC1 of 1.10.6 last week, I went back to see how I managed to mess up that RC. While looking into that, I uncovered an unrelated issue which I think now needs attention and decision before I start a new RC release for 1.10.6. As far as I understand the pom files th

Re: JDK 13 - Early Access build 14 is available

Hi Rory, I forgot to reply to this. Our tests against JDK 12 GA and JDK 13 EA (build 15), on Linux system, haven't shown any regressions. Tests against these versions [1][2] have passed without any new failures (the ones you see in those jobs are known failures and aren't related to the JDK versi

Re: JDK 13 - Early Access build 17 is available

Hello Rory, I just gave JDK 13 (build 18) a try with our master branch of Ant on a Linux system and all seems fine[1] (no unexpected failures) [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk13-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/13/ -Jaikiran On 19/04/19 5:34 PM, Rory O'Donnel

[VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.6 based on RC2

Hello all, I've created a release candidate RC2 for 1.10.6. This release contains bug fixes as well as enhancements. The release was generated using JDK 11 version (to include JDK9+ features/tasks). The minimal required version of Java runtime, to use this Ant release, still remains Java 8. Rele

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.6 based on RC2

+1 - Downloaded the .tar.gz binary. - Used this version to build some of our internal projects - Checked the NOTICE file - Checked some random task manuals All looks fine. -Jaikiran On 02/05/19 7:46 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Hello all, > > I've created a release candidate

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.6 based on RC2

With +1s from: Stefan Maarten Jaikiran and no vetos, this vote now passes. I will proceed with the rest of the release formalities. Thank you for voting. -Jaikiran On 07/05/19 9:45 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2019-05-02, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> I've created a release

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.10.6 released

The Apache Ant Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.10.6. Apache Ant is a Java library and command-line tool that helps building software. The Apache Ant team currently maintains two lines of development. The 1.9.x releases require Java5 at runtime and 1.10.x requires Java8 at

Re: JDK 13 - Early Access build 20 is available

Hello Rory, Though a quick run of our testsuite against this build 20 of JDK 13 passed without any regressions, I did notice an issue with this build. I've created https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223695 to track it. I hope it's OK that I directly created it in the JIRA instead of discuss

Re: JDK 13 - Early Access build 20 is available

next build. > > So I closed it as a duplicate of the same. > > -Muneer > > > On 10/05/19 4:19 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: >> Hello Rory, >> >> Though a quick run of our testsuite against this build 20 of JDK 13 >> passed without any regress

Updating bugzilla with recent releases of Ant

One of the steps that I couldn't complete during the 1.9.14 and 1.10.6 release was to update our Bugzilla to mark these versions as released and create new versions for bug tracking. Can one of us, who has admin rights in bugzilla, please do the necessary? -Jaikiran

Re: Updating bugzilla with recent releases of Ant

Thank you Stefan. -Jaikiran On 10/05/19 6:40 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2019-05-10, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> Can one of us, who has admin rights in bugzilla, please do the necessary? > Done > > Stefan > > ---

Unintentional broken compatibility of Ant 1.10.6 with Java 8

As you all might know, we released Ant 1.10.6 some days back. That release was built using Java 11 but targeted to be usable with Java 8 (our minimum requirement runtime that we support). However, due to a bug in our build and release process, we have broken the compatibility of this version agains

Re: Unintentional broken compatibility of Ant 1.10.6 with Java 8

On 24/05/19 9:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2019-05-24, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> As you all might know, we released Ant 1.10.6 some days back. That >> release was built using Java 11 but targeted to be usable with Java 8 >> (our minimum requirement runtime that we sup

Re: [ant] branch master updated: Avoid connection refused errors by leaving some time between the gets, works locally lets see if it also works for jenkins

Hi Martijn, You are right - these tests have been failing regularly with connection refused issues on Jenkins. Your commit seems to have improved the situation although, they still seem to fail once in a while like here https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Windows/jdk=JDK%201.8.0_

Re: Augmenting the ant wrapper script for OS packaging

On 11/06/19 9:54 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I'm a bit torn but would prefer adding it to the default script so that > running Ant would use the same wrapper no matter how you've installed > it. I'm afraid we'd have to ask people "how have you installed Ant" > otherwise. +1. Given that the star

Re: JDK 13 enters Rampdown Phase One

Hi Rory, No issues uncovered for this build against our Ant project on a Linux system. https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk13-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/16/ (Failures there are known failures). -Jaikiran On 16/06/19 11:10 AM, Rory O'Donnell wrote: > Hi Stefan

Re: JDK 13 , JDK 14 & Valhalla Early Access builds are available.

Hi Rory, No issues noticed with these 13 and 14 versions against a Linux CI job https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/18/ -Jaikiran On 08/07/19 6:16 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote: >  Hi Stefan/Jaikiran, > > **OpenJDK* 13 Early Access build **28 is now available **at : - > j

Re: JDK 13 enters Rampdown Phase Two

Hello Rory, I'm a bit late to this, but I just ran our Ant project tests against JDK 13 EA build 31 (the latest) and JDK 14 EA build 7 (the latest) on our Linux CI setups and both[1][2] of them went through fine without any unexpected failures. [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(la

Re: JDK 13 is now in the Release Candidate Phase

Hello Rory, No issues noticed with this JDK 13 build 33 and JDK 14 build 14-ea+10-332 against our Ant project on Linux CI jobs. https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/20/jdk_axis=jdk13-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/ https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)

(source/target/release) argument passing to javac task is broken in master

Hello Martijn, I was in the process of running some tests to decide if we are in a state to do a release of Ant project. While doing so, I ran into an issue where our project build no longer honours the source, target and release attributes of the javac task for versions of javac that support it.

Re: (source/target/release) argument passing to javac task is broken in master

a 8. > > Br Martijn > > > On 25-08-19 09:18, Jaikiran Pai wrote: >> Hello Martijn, >> >> I was in the process of running some tests to decide if we are in a >> state to do a release of Ant project. While doing so, I ran into an >> issue where our proj

Re: [ant] branch master updated: Fixed regression on javac version selection in case build.compiler property is set.

Thank you Martijn, your commit does indeed fixes the issues I was running into. On 25/08/19 3:18 PM, Martijn Kruithof wrote: > This still leaves an issue, > > If ant is run using java 8 and an external compiler java 11 is used, > the correct compiler version is not determined, this is also the cas

Re: JDK 13 is now in the Release Candidate Phase & JDK 14 build 11 is available.

Hello Rory, No issues observed on our Linux setups running Ant against this JDK 13 build 13+33 and JDK 14 build 14-ea+11-371. [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk13-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/21/ [2] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%

Recent build enhancements and CI jobs to help test Java runtime compatibility

A while back I mentioned[1] the issue we ran into with our Ant 1.10.6 release which broke compatibility with Java 8 runtime. I outlined what needed to be done to be able to catch such issues going forward. In short, we needed our build logic and our CI infrastructure to be able to do the following:

Re: Recent build enhancements and CI jobs to help test Java runtime compatibility

On 26/08/19 5:28 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > To accomplish the above goals, this weekend I have been doing some minor > enhancements to the build infrastructure and also have introduced a > test-compatibility.sh[3] script which helps us to use a CI job to run > this Java runtime c

Ant 1.10.7 release?

Now that the master branch has the necessary changes I had in mind to fix the Java compatibility issue from reoccurring and also a few other bug fixes, should we go ahead and release 1.10.7 of Ant? Martijn, you did mention in a recent mail that you might be interested in looking into a javac task

RAT report for Ant and our copyright header changes

Our Ant Rat reports have been complaining[1] about "unknown" license headers on (all) our source files. This has to do with the recent change where we changed the reference http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 to https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 (http -> https). Based on a previous

[VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.7 based on RC1

Hello all, I've created a release candidate RC1 for Ant 1.10.7 release. This release is mostly a bug fix release with just a couple of minor enhancements. The release was built using JDK 11 version (to include JDK9+ features/tasks). The minimal required version of Java runtime, to use this Ant re

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.7 based on RC1

code attached to that issue, with this newer version. - Verified the sha512 checksum for the -bin.tar.gz is correct. -Jaikiran On 01/09/19 5:40 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Hello all, > > I've created a release candidate RC1 for Ant 1.10.7 release. This > release is mostly a bug

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.7 based on RC1

Hi Martijn, On 03/09/19 12:57 AM, Martijn Kruithof wrote: > > Please note, commit 80768efaab4003d90252095d160facfc35adc35e and the > tag are not visible (yet) I can see it here https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ant.git;a=commit;h=80768efaab4003d90252095d160facfc35adc35e -Jaikiran -

[RESULT] Release Ant 1.10.7 based on RC1

With +1s from: Martijn Stefan Jaikiran and no vetos, this vote now passes. I'll finish the rest of the release formalities soon. Thank you both for voting. -Jaikiran On 03/09/19 9:57 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2019-09-01, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> I've created a

Bugzilla release of 1.10.7 version

I am almost done with the release process, but I'll need help with updating Bugzilla to "release" 1.10.7 and create a new 1.10.8 release, please. Can someone with the relevant rights, please do this? -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe,

Re: Bugzilla release of 1.10.7 version

Thank you Stefan. -Jaikiran On 05/09/19 10:03 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2019-09-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> I am almost done with the release process, but I'll need help with >> updating Bugzilla to "release" 1.10.7 and create a new 1.10.8 release, >>

Deleting older releases from svn?

One of the steps that I haven't yet done as a release manager is, deleting the older releases from our svn repo at dist/release/ant[binaries/sources/manual]. The release instructions say that it's as simple as "svn rm". But before doing that I wanted to check if I should be moving those to some "ar

Re: [ant] branch master updated: Clarify the snapcraft release command

Hi Stefan, On 05/09/19 12:38 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2019-09-05, wrote: > >> -$ snapcraft release ant REVISION latest/stable 1.10/stable >> +$ snapcraft release ant REVISION latest/stable >> +$ snapcraft release ant REVISION 1.10/stable > I'm pretty sure I've done it with the s

Re: Deleting older releases from svn?

On 05/09/19 12:36 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2019-09-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> One of the steps that I haven't yet done as a release manager is, >> deleting the older releases from our svn repo at >> dist/release/ant[binaries/sources/manual]. The release ins

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.10.7 released

The Apache Ant Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.10.7. Apache Ant is a Java library and command-line tool that helps building software. The Apache Ant team currently maintains two lines of development. The 1.9.x releases require Java 5 at runtime and 1.10.x requires Java 8 a

Planning to initiate a Ivy release

So I finally found the time that was needed to read and understand a part of the Ivy codebase, in order to fix the major https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1580 issue. I have pushed a commit which contains the fix as well as a testcase to reproduce and verify the issue. Existing tests pass t

Re: Planning to initiate a Ivy release

tlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16403338 [2] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/64#issuecomment-362251800 [3] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/55 -Jaikiran > Gintas > > On Sun, 8 Sep 2019 at 05:54, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> So I finally

Re: Buliding IvyDE

Tim, I don't use Eclipse nor do I have experience building Eclipse plugins. The IvyDE project is in maintenance mode and hasn't seen much activity. If you are interested in helping fix some of the issues, then "master" branch is the right branch to work against. You can raise a PR and if it's some

Re: Release Announcement: General Availability of Java 13 / JDK 13

Hello Rory, Congratulations on the GA release. Our Ant testsuite (on Linux) against JDK 13 GA and JDK 14-ea+14-570 have passed fine (ignore the unrelated failures)[1][2] [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/22/jdk_axis=jdk13-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/ [2] https://build

Re: JDK 14 - Early Access build 17 is available

Hello Rory, No unexpected failures against our Ant project Linux OS testsuite[1]. JDK 14 build 14-ea+17-721. [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/23/jdk_axis=jdk14-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/ -Jaikiran On 04/10/19 2:42 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote: >  Hi Stefan/Jaikiran, >

Re: issue ivy 2.5.0 rc1

Adding to what Maarten noted - the nightly builds are available for testing here https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/build/ The plan is to release a newer version of Ivy 2.5.0 soon (one other user has reported a different issue which I want to review first before decidin

[VOTE] Release Ivy 2.5.0 based on RC1

Hello everyone, I have built a candidate release for Ivy 2.5.0. It's been a long time since we have done a release of Ivy. 2.4.0 was released on December 26, 2014 after which it took a while to release the next version. We revived the project a few years later and many bug fixes and some enhancem

Re: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.5.0 based on RC1

+1. - Downloaded the .tar.gz and installed locally. - Checked the NOTICE file. - Checked some random documentation files. - Ran some examples that are shipped. - Built an internal project with this version. All went fine. -Jaikiran On 20/10/19 4:43 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Hello every

Re: JDK 14 - Early Access build 19 is available

Hello Rory, No issues[1] observed with this build (JDK 14 build 14-ea+19-824) against our Ant project on a Linux system. [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk14-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/24/ -Jaikiran On 20/10/19 12:17 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote: >  Hi Stefan

Re: AW: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.5.0 based on RC1

Hello Jan, On 24/10/19 1:31 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > Checked the bin.zip. > Seems to be ok. > > Just a question: there is a file fr\jayasoft\ivy\ant\antlib.xml which seems > to be a copy of org\apache\ivy\ant\antlib.xml. Is it for BWC? Yes, looks like it. https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/b

[RESULT] Release Ivy 2.5.0 based on RC1

With +1s from: Jaikiran Pai Stefan Bodewig Jan Matèrne and no vetos, this vote now passes. I'll initiate the rest of the process to complete this release process. Thank you all for voting. -Jaikiran On 24/10/19 9:45 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > +1 &g

Need help releasing IVY project in JIRA

It looks like I don't have relevant permissions in JIRA to release the IVY project. Can someone with appropriate permissions at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY please rename the "master" release https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/IVY/versions/12343084 to "2.5.0" and officially releas

Re: AW: Need help releasing IVY project in JIRA

Thank you Jan. -Jaikiran On 24/10/19 11:32 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > done > > Jan > >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: Jaikiran Pai [mailto:jaiki...@apache.org] >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2019 13:42 >> An: Ant Developers List >>

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Ivy 2.5.0 released

The Apache Ivy project is pleased to announce its 2.5.0 release. Apache Ivy is a tool for managing (recording, tracking, resolving and reporting) project dependencies, characterized by flexibility, configurability, and tight integration with Apache Ant. Key features of this 2.5.0 release are:   

Re: AW: AW: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.5.0 based on RC1

On 25/10/19 12:13 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: >>> Just a question: there is a file fr\jayasoft\ivy\ant\antlib.xml which >> seems to be a copy of org\apache\ivy\ant\antlib.xml. Is it for BWC? >> Yes, looks like it. >> https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/blob/master/build.xml#L263. It was >> done wa

Next plans for Ivy

Now that Ivy 2.5.0 has been released, I would like to propose the following ideas for the next goals for the project: 1. I would like to wait and watch for any bug reports for 2.5.0 and do some relatively frequent bug fix releases for that version. So essentially 2.5.x versions which are solely bu

Re: Next plans for Ivy

Hello Matt, On 31/10/19 2:34 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > Java 9 and beyond can be handled with version specific code in META-INF. I think we should be able to do that even now. Of course, _building_ Ivy would need higher version of Java (to use those specific APIs) but once built, we can package the

Re: JDK 14 - Early Access build 22 is available

Hello Rory, No issues observed with JDK 14 build 14-ea+23-1048 on our Linux system against the Ant project https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk14-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/25/ -Jaikiran On 12/11/19 3:10 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote: >  Hi Stefan/Jaikiran, > > *Open

Re: JDK 14 - Early Access build 25 is available

Hello Rory, No issues found with this JDK 14 build 14-ea+25-1178 against our Ant project on a Linux system https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk14-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/26/ -Jaikiran On 29/11/19 3:13 PM, Rory O'Donnell wrote: >  Hi Stefan/Jaikiran, > > *Open

Re: JDK 14 enters Rampdown Phase One

Hello Rory, I forgot to reply to this earlier this week. Our tests on a Linux system against this version (JDK 14 build 14-ea+27-1339) have passed without any unexpected failures[1]. [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk14-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/27/ -Jaik

Time for 1.10.8 release?

I just noticed that we have added some good number of bug fixes[1] since our 1.10.7 release and it's been already 4 months since that release. If no one has any objections then I'll go ahead and start a vote for 1.10.8 release, in the next few days. [1] https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/master/WH

Re: Time for 1.10.8 release?

There's time. If it's a straightforward PR, I'll merge it. -Jaikiran On 10/01/20 7:46 pm, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > I was planning a tiny PR to update the third party libraries, if there's > time still. > > Gintas > > On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 14:54, Ja

Re: JDK 14 Early Access build 30 & JDK 15 Early Access build 4 are available.

Hello Rory, A very happy new year to you too! We have run our Ant testsuite on a Linux setup against the following EA versions and have noticed no issues. JDK 14 build 14-ea+30-1385 - https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk14-ea,label_exp=ubuntu/28/ JDK 15

Re: Reference to http://repo1.maven.org/maven2, now blocked with 501 error

Hello Davide, On 16/01/20 2:54 pm, Davide Grandi wrote: > Good morning Ant developers, > > since yesterday the http access to repo1.maven.org is blocked. Thank you for bringing this to our notice. > It happens that in trunk file >     lib\libraries.properties > at line 21, there's a such refere

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >