Re: ClassLoader and Properties handling behaviour

Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, I have heard that it is now possible to specify ClassLoaders and Properties handlers. Is this true? These are experimental at this stage. They have been added but not used much or extensively tested. I think more work remains in this areas. In Maven we embed the use of An

Re: [ANN] Ant 1.5.2 Released!

Steve Cohen wrote: Congratulations. One minor quibble - WHATSNEW does not mention any of the significant revisions to the starteam optional tasks, which are in this release. That's my fault - I was a little remiss with the WHATSNEW file. Conor

Re: building optional tasks

Steve Cohen wrote: Finally, the Library Dependencies section of http://ant.apache.org/manual/index.html still states that for the ftp and telnet tasks, netcomponents.jar must be downloaded from www.savarese.org/oro/downloads. However, the code of the ant tasks has been changed to use commons-net-1

Re: [Proposal] Krysalis Centipede, Ruper, Version to Ant

On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:15 am, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > - krysalis-centipede (the distro) \ > - krysalis-cents (the antlibs) > Centipede > - krysalis-ant-tasks (the tasks)/ > > - krysalis-ruper (the downloader) > - krysalis-version (versioning code) > > We have some c

Re: Ant homepage in konqueror

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:25 am, Costin Manolache wrote: > Does anyone else use konqueror ? It seems the margin on ant.apache.org is > too small and it looks really. It looks ok on other browsers. > > Is it a browser bug or something we can fix ? > I'm using Stock RH8.0 and whilst I normally use Mozil

Re: 1.5.3?

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:02 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > as I feared, the zip refactorings have introduced a (at least one) > nasty bug. I think 17648 is serious enough to warrant a 1.5.3 release > rather soon. We might get a chance to look into the new FTP issue at > the same time. > > Thoug

Re: 1.5.3?

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:28 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Not too long. So far it is hard to recommend switching to 1.5.2. > Should we pull it, then? > > Should we limit 1.5 branch changes to these fixes to avoid > > introducing other issues? > > I think so. > OK, agreed. As for timeframe, how ab

Re: Feature request: Ignore attributes and elements from foreign namespaces

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 07:04 am, Herr Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote: > Hello dear Ant developers, > > > Currently, Ant complains about the xmlns:cvs and cvs:Header attributes, it > doesn't recognize namespaces at all. > Try Ant 1.6 alpha from CVS or a nightly build. -- Co

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

ranch beore we really start to polish 1.6. 1.5.2 was meant to do that but I think we may have rushed it a little. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

> I think more people will be able to try it out if they know about it and it is documented. We can update the document when we update the code :-) An entry in WHATSNEW would also be a good idea. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

nwhile, it should be possible to make a discussion on the antlib feature > or new taskdef, and on the boot loader process for ant on Win 9x. I have some ideas on the boot loader as I've done somethign similar before. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

JDK 1.1 support

ue to its change in system requirements) 4. Drop all the Ant2 cruft from the website. Just as a data point, CVS HEAD (Ant 1.6) has not compiled against JDK 1.1 for a while now (due to diagnostics changes). -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: JDK 1.1 support

On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:55 am, Steve Loughran wrote: > From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > 4. Drop all the Ant2 cruft from the website. > > I think it should be preserved. > Some it is still interesting and worth keeping. By cruft I mean stateme

Re: JDK 1.1 support

On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:53 am, Costin Manolache wrote: > Conor MacNeill wrote: > > I'd like to throw this up again. What are peoples thoughts on the > > following > > > > 1. Make Ant 1.6.x the last JDK 1.1 release. This would be clearly > > documented > &g

Re: JDK 1.1 support

On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 01:02 pm, Steve Loughran wrote: > > Maybe we should ask the user community, not the dev mailing list. > Good idea - done. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: java 1.1 on linux

s last aspect before we release 1.5.3 which I think we need to release real soon now. Conor -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

[VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

compilation, including Ant 1.5.3 and any subsequent maintenance releases. The ability to compile/build for JDK 1.1 deployment continues to be supported in all releases. Here is my +1 -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

a timing issue? > > +1 on making 1.5.4 (if needed) support JDK 1.1. And Ant 1.5.5 :-) -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Ant 1.5.3 Release Plan?

e speak up :-) Conor -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: Ant 1.5.3 Release Plan?

1.5.1 and earlier). It > should always write UTF-8, though. > Yes, probably a good idea. I'll try to look at it in the next few days. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: Some library questions for the optional.jar stuff

other building these and just include in the source distribution this time around. Thereafter we need a "legacy task" area where these can live and be distributed without being built for ongoing distrbutions. Thoughts? Conor -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: Some library questions for the optional.jar stuff

e. > Since I have access to the necessary weblogic jars, I will build the beta. I will post a release plan on Monday. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

[VOTE] Release Plan for Ant 1.5.3

take place around 7-April-2003. I will act as release manager. Please indicate your vote. I'll start with my +1 -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

[ANN] Ant 1.5.3 Beta 1 Available for download

Ant 1.5.3 Beta 1 is available for download http://ant.apache.org/beta/ Please try this out and help us sort out any issues in the release. If you have any issues, please raise as a bug on BugZilla http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Ant Thanks -- Conor MacNeill Blog

Re: URGENT: problem installing Ant

what the Ant launch script is up to. > my PATH: Doesn't look quite right - it should include $ANT_HOME/bin not $ANT_HOME. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: Merging fixes for 17646 and 17721 into 1.5.3?

On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 07:48 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > In this case, I'd favor to merge them in. > +1 -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: [Patch] one obsolete file can go away from optional/perforce

h > docs/manual/OptionalTasks/perforce.html which is maintained. This file is used in the generation of javadocs. Are you suggesting to remove it? Actually I would like to see all packages have a package.html file. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: Regression in CVS HEAD - probably related to embed proposal

e and fix. The same strategy could be used here. Conor -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: Regression in CVS HEAD - probably related to embed proposal

understanding. I also want to pull out a whole duplicated class that I came across. Actually a lot of code needs to cleaned up. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: The JavaCC and JJTree tasks....

ld versions. Thoughts? -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Fwd: failure notice

-- Forwarded Message: -- Subject: failure notice Date: 2 Apr 2003 05:29:29 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent err

jdepend error

(jdepend.framework.PackageFilter) location: class jdepend.textui.JDepend jdepend.setFilter(new jdepend.framework.PackageFilter(v)); ^ Just FYI ... Conor -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: jdepend error

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:38 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > The version of jdepend I have hanging around for building Ant is not > > compatible with the recent changes > > Any chance to find out w

Re: jdepend error

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 01:03 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Does it at least have the PackageFilter class? > Yes, in the depend.framework package. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: cvs commit: ant/xdocs/stylesheets templates.vm

is important IMHO. > Yes, I've been reading Mark Pilgrim's accessibility stuff. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: Where are we WRT the JDK decision?

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 06:28 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > IIUC we don't have a 1.1 compatibility requirement for CVS HEAD any > longer, so that is fine. This is the case - I just need to write up an email about it which I'll try to do tonight. Conor -- Conor MacNeill Blog:

[RESULT] Ant 1.6 will require JDK 1.2

tefan, who only voted +0, is the first to make a change that requires JDK 1.2 :-) -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: VOTE: new committer: Jesse Stockall

On Sun, 6 Apr 2003 04:13 pm, Steve Loughran wrote: > > Here's my vote: > > +1 +1 -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

[PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. There are just a few minor changes from the Beta. Please indicate your support for this release Here is my +1 Conor

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:41 pm, Conor MacNeill wrote: > I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. There are just a few minor changes from the > Beta. > I'm having trouble getting the JSPC test to work - any ideas? Conor -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: cvs commit: ant/xdocs/stylesheets site.vsl

On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:33 pm, Jesse Stockall wrote: > On Tuesday, April 8, 2003, at 09:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > + http://ant.apache.org/beta/";>download. > > Is this the intended download link? > Umm, no - fixed now - thanks Conor -- Conor MacNeill

1.5.3 Release

The 1.5.3 release is up on the site. I haven't had time to send the announcements out yet. Conor -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Deferred datatype evaluation

't looked into these failures yet - it may be a problem or something I've broken. I don't want to bother until there is consensus that this is interesting. Thoughts? Conor -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/Index: src/mai

Re: Deferred datatype evaluation

On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:30 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > How is this different from say > > > > > > > > > It doesn't work either. > > If you delay the configuration of , but not the expansion of > properties, properties and data-types will get even more inconsistent. > > This doesn't

[ANN] Ant 1.5.3 released

most mirrors by now. Give it a try and if there are any problems, please let us know. Thanks Conor -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 04:49 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > bodewig 2003/04/09 23:49:01 > > Modified:.WHATSNEW > Log: > Spread the word > Yeah brother. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

Re: [VOTE] Antoine Levy-Lambert as committer

On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:31 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Let me start with my +1 > +1

Re: [VOTE] Antoine Levy-Lambert as committer

On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:36 pm, Christoph Wilhelms wrote: > > I have Perforce, too! I am using it for my private SCM, for it is free for > up to two clients at one server! I'd recommend you check it out yourself! > It's really nice and it it really written by programmers for programmers! > Sorry for

Re: [VOTE] Antoine Levy-Lambert as committer

On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:08 pm, Christoph Wilhelms wrote: > > Message understood |-). I'll do when I can find the time, of course - as > well as you are free to contribute to ANTidote *g*! > touché. Conor

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/selectors ExtendSelector.java

I have some questions about this patch On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 03:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > +Project.setProjectOnObject(project, o); Why is this a static method rather than a plain method like this: project.setProjectOnObject(o); Why don't we define an interface for all

Re: FileUtils.createTempFile() - should we delete on exit?

On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 01:58 pm, Jesse Stockall wrote: > Bug 17512 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512 > proposes a fix for an annoyance that 'plagues' a number of Ant tasks. > > Tasks like and can create temporary files that get left > behind if the build is terminated via 'ctrl

Re: DynamicTag

On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:55 am, Dominique Devienne wrote: > 2) DynamicTag is lazy, thanks to UnknownElement. Your rewrite is creating > the element at parse-time, my implementation does it only at runtime. > Again, I favor delaying the instantiation and configuration. Ant should > never have mingled

Re: junit.jar in Ant 1.5.3 distro?!?!?

On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:45 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why is Ant 1.5.3 shipping with junit.jar in ANT_HOME/lib??? > > It is? Which download? > > Without shipping the license of JUnit and all that, we can't do it. > Hmmm, not s

Re: junit.jar in Ant 1.5.3 distro?!?!?

On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 05:56 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > One thing that you'll need to consider is that people may download the > old distribution from a mirror and try to check it with the signature > for the new distribution from www.apache.org. > > You will probably have to chose different names fo

Re: ant tutorial

On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 01:01 am, Craeg Strong wrote: > This tutorial is incredibly valuable, IMO. > I would love to see this checked into CVS and given > a permanent home on the ant website, kind of like > ant in anger... > > 2c, > Thanks for the positive feedback. I am intending to write a series of

Re: ant tutorial

On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 02:43 am, Gus Heck wrote: > I agree. This is really cool. The section labeled "Top Level Tasks" > seems to say that tasks on the top level are run at parse-time. Does > this mean that the order of tasks at the top level is the order of > execution, or do the old toplevel tasks s

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types ZipFileSet.java defaults.properties

On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 08:02 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > antoine 2003/04/18 15:02:59 > > Index: Zip.java > === > RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Zip.java,v > retrieving revision 1.103 > retr

Re: [VOTE]

On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:19 pm, Erik Hatcher wrote: > I use from ant-contrib a lot. I propose that it be > migrated to Ant's HEAD. Objections? > > +1 > Who is the copyright owner? I think it is up to them to donate the code - we cannot just absorb it. Conor

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Location.java

On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 01:08 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > bodewig 2003/03/31 07:08:37 > > Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Location.java > Log: > unURIfy build-file name if necessary. > >/** > @@ -118,7 +119,11 @@ > * @param columnNumber Column number within the line

Re: Roles (was: antlib)

On Fri, 2 May 2003 09:55 pm, peter reilly wrote: > > No... > Ant does not have the infrastructure at the moment to support XML > namespaces, and their associated contexts. > It may be better to add that infrastructure then :-) It may also be better to use XML Schema's syntax for Polymorphism as t

Re: Roles (was: antlib)

On Wed, 7 May 2003 03:14 pm, Costin Manolache wrote: > Let's not reinvent the wheel here. > > The solution for names conflicts is namespaces - not rewriting. > +1 Conor

Re: Roles (was: antlib)

On Thu, 8 May 2003 12:30 am, Costin Manolache wrote: > > The URI however should be chosen by the antlib author ( maybe based on some > rules specific to ant ), and should serve as an ID of the library. > > My proposal is to use the (main) package name. There are other options - > but I don't think

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

On Wed, 14 May 2003 07:49 pm, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > Well I have not given the fight on the need for roles and separate > symbol-tables for different Types. Well, I explained what I disliked about your roles proposal a long time ago :-). http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=101

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

On Thu, 15 May 2003 12:56 am, peter reilly wrote: > > I have merged the ant-type code into my antlib code. > However it uses a "magic" attribute name "ant-type" to > achieve the effect and not as discussed before - the > namesspaced attribute name like - "ant:type". > > I can easily do a name-space

[PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

PMC members, I'd like to move towards adoption of the bylaws draft. http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ant/proposal/ant-site/anakia/docs/bylaws.html?rev=1.16 Could you please view this and vote indicating your position. If you wish to vote -1 because you don't believe the bylaws inclu

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

On Wed, 21 May 2003 03:29 am, Steve Loughran wrote: > +1, with couple of questions > > -I'm unsure about the point that Active PMC members have the binding vote > for committers -to date its been open to all committers to have binding > votes. Is there a reason for the change? > The PMC role is t

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

On Wed, 21 May 2003 05:30 am, Bruce Atherton wrote: > > +1 assuming the typos are fixed. I'd go in and fix them, but I'm not sure > whether that might affect the vote. > No, fixing typos wouldn't affect the vote, so please go ahead and fix them :-) Thanks Conor

Ant status report (for board)

Status Report for the Ant project o Ant 1.5.2 Ant 1.5.2 was released on March 3, 2003 The zip refactoring that was undertaken to eliminate a number of zip/jar update bugs introduced a regression whereby some elements of the produced Zips could not be viewed by WinZIP. This required a followup

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

On Wed, 21 May 2003 05:21 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > I've seen that Costin and Conor prefer that antlibs specify their URI > themselves. Could anybody please explain why - and at the same time > please also explain why user choice would be bad here? I feel I must > be missing something. There

Re: antlib

On Wed, 21 May 2003 06:58 pm, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > I still think that the roles concept is good and I would like to make a > separate proposal for roles. My idea would be along the following lines, > supposing that ant is being used by specialists of geometry : > > > class="org.apache.

Re: antlib

On Wed, 21 May 2003 08:31 pm, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > Well I have to say you are mistaken, in my proposal the task (container) > implemented the addConfigured(InterfaceRole) method. The interface was > for the thing being passed (the child element, after possibly some > adaptor). > Well

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

On Wed, 21 May 2003 04:19 pm, Bruce Atherton wrote: > > Ok, done. > Great - thanks. > But in proofing the document I realized there was another issue that may be > a significant typo or may just require a bit more editing. > > The responsibilities section says this: > > The PMC may consider the

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

On Wed, 21 May 2003 07:41 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Do we need to refer to RfR at all? No. Actually I don't like RfR either. I've removed it and added a snippet to cover new sub-project creation here too. Refer to the recent commit and let me know what you think. Should the latter be restric

Re: antlib

On Thu, 22 May 2003 01:02 am, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > Whatever we adopt, it definetly need to be written from scratch. :-) > Cool. All I had to go on was the code. If we agree that roles are based on the interface implemented by the nested element, that is good. It was my main concern. I

[VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer

Hi, I would like to propose Peter Reilly as an Ant committer. He has submitted a number of patches that advance the Ant core fanctions as well as helping out answering questions on the user list. I think we've all seen that he has the persistence required :-) I will start with my +1 Conor

Re: copy task addition

On Tue, 27 May 2003 12:23 am, David Kavanagh wrote: > I just signed on to contribute something we found useful. > > We wanted to filter files based on the project properties. This is > because we do something like this in the top of our build.xml file; > > > > > > So, we couldn't use

Re: add(Type) submit

On Wed, 28 May 2003 07:49 pm, peter reilly wrote: > I am thinking of commiting patch number 6453 from > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19897 > > This adds the add(Type) introspection rule and implements > it in condition, filterchain and selectors. > > I have had a couple of +1s

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit FormatterElement.java JUnitTask.java

On Wed, 28 May 2003 11:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ehatcher2003/05/28 06:12:04 > > Modified:.WHATSNEW >docs/manual/OptionalTasks junit.html >src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit > FormatterElement.java

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit FormatterElement.java JUnitTask.java

On Wed, 28 May 2003 11:27 pm, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > If folks feel strongly about it, I'll revert it. > I'm not into strong feelings :-). Let's see what people think. Conor

Re: Error in [if]-task

On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 07:09 pm, peter reilly wrote: > I see the problem. > Cool. Actually, I think we should just get rid of that logging altogether. It provides not much useful info and a more useful exception is coming in a few milliseconds anyway. MHO, I don't think you need to open Bug report

scriptdef

Hi all, I've just added a task to allow tasks to be created using scripts. It's loosely based on something I wrote a while back for Mutant. Attached below is an example usage. I had to make a few small mods to the core to give me enough control over the configuration of the task and its neste

Re: Embedded dynamic ANT tasks.

On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 08:42 pm, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > You could do the following, which will require no changes to code: > Funnily enough, this approach is pretty close to what I was working on for . It doesn't use DynamicConfigurator, however, as that doesn't really allow for deferred cr

Re: scriptdef

On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:14 am, Alexey Solofnenko wrote: > This is just great. It also solves

Re: iFtp external tool addition request

On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 02:08 am, Deborah Clay wrote: > Hi, > > Would appreciate it if you would take a look at iFtp-Ant and consider > adding it to The "External tools and tasks" list. > Deborah, I've had a quick look. One issue is that you cannot declare a source file Copyright Apache Software Foun

Ant wins Javaworld award

Ant has again won the JavaWorld "Most Useful Java Community-Developed Technology". Thanks to everyone who has contributed over the years to make Ant a great project. http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-06-2003/jw-0609-eca-p4.html Conor

Re: import statements

On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 04:46 am, Gus Heck wrote: > I was noticing that the file I am working on has it's imports in > alphabetical order. Is this the standard, or are we free to organize our > imports however we want in submissions? > I have noticed some that arn't quite alphabetical, and I actually p

Re: Embedded dynamic ANT tasks.

On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:24 pm, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > Connor, > > Can you expand on why DynamicConfigurator wasn't an option for > your ScriptBaseDef class? Actually I think it could (should) be used. I thought originally that since createElement was called at config time, I would need t

Re: property from a flat file

On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 04:32 am, Gus Heck wrote: > Is there already a known way to load the entire contents of a file into > a property? I know someone that wrote a custom task for this (using it > with replace) and at a quick look I didn't see this functionality > anywhere. Should I convince him to a

Re: Ant scripting from Jython.

Hi Duncan, You all might like to look at two recent threads in ant-dev and ant-user that are somewhat related to this topic. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=105516662409107&w=2 and http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-user&m=10549510585&w=2 Instead of the "script driving Ant task

Re: scriptdef

On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 07:10 am, Alexey Solofnenko wrote: > There seems a bug in - it does not expand properties: > > > > #script > print ">> name='"+str(attributes.get('name'))+"'" > > > > > prints > > >> name='${test}' > > Do I need to do it manually? > No, it's a bug - I'

Re: scriptdef

On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 03:07 pm, Conor MacNeill wrote: > > No, it's a bug - I'll look into it. > Alexey, This should be fixed now. I reworked the scriptdef operation to use DynamicConfigurator and that fixed this too. Thanks for tryi

Re: Using classloader for Junit

On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 12:17 am, Nick Chalko wrote: > After I slept on it, I thought of how I could extend the antclassloader > to handle the situations I need. > I am considering a > That will explicitly allow the optional ant task to be loaded in the > child classloader. > I may even go so far as

Re: FileSet reference in Javac ..

On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 02:59 am, Harsha Kalidindi wrote: > Hi: > > I looked through the mail archives to see if anyone had the same > issue with not being able to reference FileSets in Javac. I saw a query but > no responses. > > > >... > > >

Re: Using classloader for Junit

On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:40 am, Nick Chalko wrote: > > The > if (resourceName.startsWith("org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.")) > {return useParentFirst;} > HACK worked last night. > > I will try something a little cleaner tonight. It might appear to work but can fail in subtle ways. I have had

Re: "Donations" link

On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:24 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > would anybody have a problem with a link named "Donations" under "Get > Involved" on our homepage that points to > ? > +1 Conor -

Ant 1.6 todo thoughts

I'd like to kick off a discussion on what needs to be done to get Ant 1.6 to a release. I'm just going to ramble through some random thoughts I have been having in no particular order just to get discussion started. I don't have any fixed timeframe in mind, or anything so concrete at this stag

[VOTE] Jan Materne as committer

I'd like to propose Jan Materne as an Ant committer. I think his contribution in recent months has been quite obvious both on the dev and user lists and also the bug reports. I think he would make a great committer. Here's my +1 to start the ball rolling. Conor ---

Re: Bylaws?

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 06:04 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I vaguely recall that we accepted the bylaws currently in the proposal > subdir before my vacation. Can we move them to "the proper Ant site"? > Yes, the vote passed - I'm a bit remiss on the vote results - sorry. I will send to the board for

Re: Ant 1.6 todo thoughts

Thanks for all the feedback. Some follow up thoughts: I will be working on the lcp.bat replacement next. This will address the command line too long, environment space issues, etc. I'm reluctant to go through a 1.5.4 release. It is possible but it doesn't give us much for the amount of effort i

Re: OT: More trivia about dates than you ever wanted to know

On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 06:22 am, Bruce Atherton wrote: > AU Australia 1752-09-02 Hmmm. I don't think the inhabitants at the time made any record of that decision. :-) Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

  1   2   3   4   5   >