On 2018-10-29, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
>> Thanks, I'll merge it to master, then.
> I've notice in Nightly that Ant treats MagicTestNames as a test, too.
Uhm, it shouldn't.
> Would it make sense to add a test method, checking for documented
> properties?
Adding a test that asserts the cons
On 2018-10-28, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> Even if running unit tests with different tools is a no-goal for you, it's
> a good check of robustness --
ACK
> I'm afraid we're cheating a little anyway by compiling testutil with core
> tests first, and then building a separate jar file.
This is
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/69
Thanks Stefan. I'll go ahead and merge this today and include a note in
WHATSNEW.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.
Github user jaikiran closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/69
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
