On 2018-06-05, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> Stefan is right -- "followsymlinks" for the fileset should have been called
> "skipsymlinks" or something like that.
I'm afraid I don't follow you here, what did you expect followsymlinks
going by the name? What would the "new semantics of followsymli
2018-06-06 10:50 GMT+02:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2018-06-05, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
>
> > Stefan is right -- "followsymlinks" for the fileset should have been
> called
> > "skipsymlinks" or something like that.
>
> I'm afraid I don't follow you here, what did you expect followsymlinks
> goin
On 2018-06-06, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> 2018-06-06 10:50 GMT+02:00 Stefan Bodewig :
>> On 2018-06-05, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
>>> Stefan is right -- "followsymlinks" for the fileset should have been
>> called
>>> "skipsymlinks" or something like that.
>> I'm afraid I don't follow you
Hello Apache Supporters and Enthusiasts
This is a final reminder that our Apache EU Roadshow will be held in
Berlin next week on 13th and 14th June 2018. We will have 28 different
sessions running over 2 days that cover some great topics. So if you are
interested in Microservices, Internet of
2018-06-06 14:31 GMT+02:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> I guess here our API breaks down as we only ever deal with files or
> directories (outside of the symlink task).
>
FileSet documentation should be more explicit about the matter, in
particular explaining what "followsymlinks" really means.
Would the
+1
Jan
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jaikiran Pai [mailto:jai.forums2...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 4. Juni 2018 10:32
> An: dev@ant.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AntUnit Bug Causing Jenkins Failures
>
> Sounds fine to me.
>
> -Jaikiran
>
>
> On 04/06/18 1:08 PM, Stefan Bodewig wr
