Github user bodewig commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
I'll have a look later and try not to be a PITA again.
WRT antunit. https://github.com/apache/ant-antlibs-antunit and you are a
committer ;-)
---
--
Github user bodewig commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/50
looks good to me - you may want to add a note to WHATSNEW as well
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For add
I went back and read up both these bugzilla reports again and I now
realize that supporting one doesn't necessarily mean not supporting the
other. BZ-43426 is about letting existing file be overwritten
(irrespective of the type of the file) if the overwrite flag is true.
BZ-58683 is about not o
On 2017-12-12, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> I went back and read up both these bugzilla reports again and I now
> realize that supporting one doesn't necessarily mean not supporting
> the other. BZ-43426 is about letting existing file be overwritten
> (irrespective of the type of the file) if the overwri
So I have now pushed a fix[1] on top of my previous changes, which
should accommodate both these use cases (and continue to use Java 7
APIs for symlinking).
This is very useful, many thanks. We may want to modify the manual so it
becomes clear that overwrite will replace regular files as well.
On 2017-12-12, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>>> So I have now pushed a fix[1] on top of my previous changes, which
>>> should accommodate both these use cases (and continue to use Java 7
>>> APIs for symlinking).
>> This is very useful, many thanks. We may want to modify the manual so it
>> becomes clear t
