Hello,
I decided to spend some time on unit tests in Ivy and Ant; I did some work
on Ivy tests this summer and I feel that work is unfinished.
In particular, there was a conversation about the use of fail(); my feeling
is that it is somewhat superfluous: there are assumptions for
(de)activating t
IMO catching an exception only makes sense if you check that exception against
certain assumptions or you expect that.
Otherwise the test runner will catch that (not excepted) and mark the test as
failed.
If the current codebase differs from that, I would agree with simplifying that.
Jan
> --
