Bug report for Ant [2010/06/27]

2010-06-27 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: bug in DOMElementWriter

2010-06-27 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Jon Stevens wrote: > For example, attr="&" comes out as attr="&" and not attr="&"... I > don't have to write attr="&" to get what I want. The same is true > with attr=">"... it comes out as attr=">" instead of attr=">". This is > all because DOMElementWriter.en

Re: [VOTE] Remove commercial tasks from Ant

2010-06-27 Thread Maarten Coene
+1 to drop all listed commercial tasks from Ant distributions +1 to create antlib in sandbox for each dropped task Maarten - Original Message From: Bruce Atherton To: Ant Developers List Sent: Sat, June 19, 2010 8:38:54 PM Subject: [VOTE] Remove commercial tasks from Ant Ant suppli

[VOTE] Ivy 2.2.0-rc1 release

2010-06-27 Thread Maarten Coene
Hi all, I have built Ivy 2.2.0-rc1. You can download it from this URL: http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/ivy/staging/2.2.0-rc1/ A maven 2 staging repo with this release is available here: http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/m2-staging-repo/ I didn't had the time to create a staging Eclipse up

Re: bug in DOMElementWriter

2010-06-27 Thread Jon Stevens
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Jon Stevens wrote: > > For example, attr="&" comes out as attr="&" and not attr="&"... I > > don't have to write attr="&" to get what I want. The same is true > > with attr=">"... it comes out as at

Re: bug in DOMElementWriter

2010-06-27 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Jon Stevens wrote: > However, the character that went into the attribute was not a \n, it was a > . I'd expect ant to give me back out, not \n. The point of > is to echo xml, is it not? In that case, the point here should be > to echo out the encoded value as x

Re: bug in DOMElementWriter

2010-06-27 Thread Jon Stevens
> > Don't get hand up on the textual representation of the XML file. This > > > > and this > > > > > is exactly the same thing as far as XML is concerned. > > And what about: which ends up like this after 'echoxml'... ? jon