Thank You Jon, this rocks..
instead of createTask() every time, is there a way to reuse the already
existing one (either may be created by xml files or with in other script
file..)
Not sure how memory and cpu intesive is createTask() specially when it is
for loop (in our case this macro is run m
macro = ...createTask(...);
for(...) {
macro.setDynamic(...)
macro.execute();
}
This should work. My example reused that too (1st with default value, 2nd run
with custom value).
You have to ensure that no required values are "deleted" in further runs. But
if all runs require
the setting o
Nope Jan..
On making such correction it giving error in line 188
i.e the line
StopWatch sw = ( StopWatch ) targetStats.get( be.getTarget() );
of targetFinished()..
It appears to me that AntPerformanceListener or the interface BuildListener
is not custom tag friendly..
Some of the
Hi Bram,
On 2009-09-01, Bram Neijt wrote:
> Of course I'm happy to answer any and all question in this thread also.
> Feel free to just mail 'no' if you are not interested in making changes
> to your project's download homepage.
Our download pages are created by CGI scripts that already selects
You could also subclass that listener and overwrite the
[task|target][Starts|Finished] by calling the build[Starts|Finished] method.
Would that help?
Or use the StopWatchTask?
http://ant-contrib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ant-contrib/ant-contrib/trunk/src/main/java/net/sf/antcontrib/perf/StopWat
Hi Stefan,
You are correct that you won't benefit from publishing metalinks, but
your users might. One of the failures a redirect/GeoIP based approach
can't solve for the user is possible firewall problems. The user may be
behind a firewall which restricts to HTTP connetions, not knowing that
for
On 2009-09-03, Bram Neijt wrote:
> You are correct that you won't benefit from publishing metalinks, but
> your users might.
Which would benefit Ant ... But I'm not convinced 8-)
> One of the failures a redirect/GeoIP based approach can't solve for
> the user is possible firewall problems. The
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 16:54 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> > Another benefit is that the download client can also verify the
> > download afterwards,
>
> This depends on my level of paranoia. Do I want to trust md5 or sha1
> hashes at all? Does the client speak OpenPGP for a stronger
Note that if your intention is to profile your own task, you can also use
any profiler you want. An ant build is a java application like an other.
Gilles Scokart
2009/9/3
> You could also subclass that listener and overwrite the
> [task|target][Starts|Finished] by calling the build[Starts|Fi
What is the benefits of having the parameters final ?
Gilles Scokart
2009/9/3
> Author: bodewig
> Date: Thu Sep 3 07:26:20 2009
> New Revision: 810793
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=810793&view=rev
> Log:
> whitespace and make method paarameters final
>
> Modified:
>
>
> ant/cor
Gilles Scokart wrote on 09/03/2009 02:51:46 PM:
> Re: svn commit: r810793 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/
> ant/filters/util/ChainReaderHelper.java
>
> What is the benefits of having the parameters final ?
It prevents you from inadvertently changing which object the parameter
name
On 2009-09-03, Gilles Scokart wrote:
> What is the benefits of having the parameters final ?
Apart from what Jeffrey said, the local variables that became parameters
when I extracted the method have been final in the first place - and I
wanted to stay true to the original code.
Stefan
On 2009-09-03, Bram Neijt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 16:54 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Do I tust the download client? ;-;
> I trust my download client, just as much as I trust my md5sums
> binary ;).
Agreed.
>> If my understanding is correct it would also allow me to create a trojan
>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
