Why not always use the server timestamp for the artifacts as we already do for
the Ivy files?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 8:51:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Ivy] How to add a new option to ivy settings
As
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Why not always use the server timestamp for the artifacts as we already do
> for the Ivy files?
Why not, indeed, I see no specific reason.
Xavier
>
>
> Maarten
>
> - Original Message
> From: Xavier Hanin <[EMA
Maybe because later an other user will have the oposite requirements :
I want the retreive to use the current timestamp, so that I know when
I made the retrieve, I know which files have been updated by my last
retrieve, I can use some kind of up-to-date task, and I can also
better integrate my retr
So maybe it should be an attribute on the ivy:retrieve task?
I think the files in the cache should have the same timestamp as on the server.
This way, you still have the choice what you want to do with the timestamp when
the artifacts are already resolved.
Maarten
- Original Message
Fr
2008/5/29 Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So maybe it should be an attribute on the ivy:retrieve task?
Yes : task attribute and/or settings attribute are both valid.
> I think the files in the cache should have the same timestamp as on the
> server.
> This way, you still have the choice wha
Hey guys, thank you for your suggestions.
I started to better understand Ivy 2 days ago, and I have no knowledge
about how to read those configurations.
Can you show me some code or guidance on how to better acomplish this
task ?
I have already modified XmlModuleDescriptorParser
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Second you said you used ant-contrib's for and I pointed out that
>> subant should be enough. The only thing that's missing is a property
>> that knows the current target, isn't it?
>>
>> I know we have reje
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Colm Smyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's nice to see some feedback and new ideas; would anybody like to
> comment on what I actually did? ;)
>
> See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44980 for the
> issue I raised almost immediately after posting a reques
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a few thing to take into considerations :
>
> 1. An eclipse update site must provide a site map page [1] that has
> to change when a new version come. 2. The site map give the
> possibility to reference an other file that
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While we are at it, would it be possible to apply 2 patches per
> tickets # 44969 and 45075?
Done
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addition
On Wed, 28 May 2008, tdakanalisw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I don't know if I am in the right forum. I have the following
> problem. I have create a Web Service which transforms a file from
> html to xml. When I call that WS I get the following error:
>
> java.lang.NullPointerException at j
I suggest you do the following:
1. create a JIRA issue for this
2. modify BasicURLHandler.java to always set the modification date on the
downloaded file
3. check if this change has the effect you wanted
4. if test results are ok, attach a patch to your JIRA issue for
BasicURLHandler.java
Maar
Hi,
the problem has been solved with the 1.7.1 beta version. Thanks a lot for
your valuable help!!!
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 May 2008, tdakanalisw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi, I don't know if I am in the right forum. I have the following
>> problem. I have create a Web Ser
This is the intended action, and it is working. But, I want this as a
configurable option, to not disrupt the current behavior.
Anyway the issue is there https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-823
Thanks
Claudio Miranda
Maarten Coene wrote:
>
> I suggest you do the following:
>
>
Thank you very much :-)
On May 29, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While we are at it, would it be possible to apply 2 patches per
tickets # 44969 and 45075?
Done
Stefan
---
15 matches
Mail list logo