I don't think the tasks should be stateless, I think it's fine the way it is
now.
There are other examples of tasks that must be executed one ofther the other,
like:
setProxy -> must be executed before outgoing http connections are made if you
have a proxy
the Clover tasks -> the setup task must
I like the enumeration syntax, like descriptor="required | otpional", it's much
more readable and it will probably allow us to have less attributes on some of
the tasks.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Saturday, March 29,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I don't think the tasks should be stateless, I think it's fine the way it
> is now.
> There are other examples of tasks that must be executed one ofther the
> other, like:
> setProxy -> must be executed before outgoing htt
Hi,
I am adding missing Apache License headers in the sources files of IvyDE. In
some file [1] there is:
Copyright Jayasoft 2005 - All rights reserved
Can I assume that I can replace them safely with the Apache License ?
Nicolas
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/ivyde/trunk/src/ja
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Nicolas Lalevée <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am adding missing Apache License headers in the sources files of IvyDE.
> In
> some file [1] there is:
>
> Copyright Jayasoft 2005 - All rights reserved
>
> Can I assume that I can replace them safely with the
For the record, I'm -0.5 to the plan of Maarten.
I think settings should looks like a datatype (and maybe resolve as
well), but I don't find any good aproach to do it. The changes would
be too big. So I don't see a better plan than the one presented by
Maarten.
If someone has a better plan, ple
Le lundi 31 mars 2008, Xavier Hanin a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Nicolas Lalevée <
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am adding missing Apache License headers in the sources files of IvyDE.
> > In
> > some file [1] there is:
> >
> > Copyright Jayasoft 2005 - All rights
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the record, I'm -0.5 to the plan of Maarten.
What do you exactly mean by -0.5? Do you mean that you don't like it, but
will still accept it if we don't find a better and more broadly accepted
solution? Or that you wi
On 31/03/2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For the record, I'm -0.5 to the plan of Maarten.
>
>
> What do you exactly mean by -0.5? Do you mean that you don't like it, but
> will still accept it if we d
