Re: Ivy settings id (was Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?)

2008-03-29 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Can't we just deprecate the "id" attribute on the settings task and use > the settingsId attribute instead? > > id is handled by Ant its

Re: cleanup Ivy DependencyResolver interface

2008-03-29 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > after my changes to fix IVY-716, the following methods on > DependencyResolver are no longer used: > > String[] listTokenValues(String token, Map otherTokenValues); > OrganisationEntry[] listOrganisations(); > Mo

Re: Fixing some naming inconsistencies in Ivy

2008-03-29 Thread Xavier Hanin
Just pinging about this e-mail, I've had no answer so far, I think I can't make the choice alone, and we need to deal with that question before 2.0final to close IVY-297. So, anyone has an opinion about this: On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > As r

Re: Ivy settings id (was Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?)

2008-03-29 Thread Gilles Scokart
I'm -1 to rename ivy:settings into ivy:loadsettings. If you realy want something like that, then it would be better to go back to the ivy:configure (and I would be -0.5). The reason I think ivy:settings should be a data-type (or look like a data type) is because every ant task are "standalone".

Re: Fixing some naming inconsistencies in Ivy

2008-03-29 Thread Gilles Scokart
On 29/02/2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > As reported by IVY-297, Ivy suffers from some name inconsistencies and > strange attribute names. Ivy 2.0 is a good opportunity to fix some of them, > since I think we can afford some more deprecation warnings. > > So I'd like to

Re: Fixing some naming inconsistencies in Ivy

2008-03-29 Thread Stephane Bailliez
Xavier Hanin wrote: Just pinging about this e-mail, I've had no answer so far, I think I can't make the choice alone, and we need to deal with that question before 2.0final to close IVY-297. So, anyone has an opinion about this: On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

import ask to support path structures

2008-03-29 Thread Raja Nagendra Kumar
It may be a good value, if import supports fileset or any path structures to disover list of files it needs to import. e.g Regards, Raja Nagendra Kumar, C.T.O www.tejasoft.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabbl