Re: [DISCUSS] release Ivy 2.0.0-beta2?

Xavier Hanin wrote: > I think we have a little less than a week before we cut the beta2. If you > can do the job (code, reference doc and junit changes) in this timeframe, > it's more than welcome! I attached a patch to IVY-399, please review. Adrian

The Cactus/JUnit-Task problem

Hi all, [Petar, it would be good if you subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it is not that high traffic anyway] last night I chatted with Petar about the backwards incompatible change to the JUnit task we introduced in Ant 1.7.0 that broke Cactus. Cactus' Ant task extends the JUnit task (and if mem

Re: [DISCUSS] release Ivy 2.0.0-beta2?

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Adrian Sandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Xavier Hanin wrote: > > > I think we have a little less than a week before we cut the beta2. If > you > > can do the job (code, reference doc and junit changes) in this > timeframe, > > it's more than welcome! > > > I att

Re: [DISCUSS] release Ivy 2.0.0-beta2?

Xavier Hanin wrote: > > I attached a patch to IVY-399, please review. > > I don't have time to review in details right now, but at first glance it > seems to be a very good job! Thanks! Take your time, no problem. Just hope to see it in beta 2 :) Adrian

Please unsubscribe me from this email list. Thank you.

Please unsubscribe me from this email list. Thank you. - Original Message From: Adrian Sandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ant Developers List Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 5:52:54 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release Ivy 2.0.0-beta2? Xavier Hanin wrote: > > I attached a patch to IVY-399,

AW: Please unsubscribe me from this email list. Thank you.

http://ant.apache.org/mail.html Send an empty email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Niamath Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Februar 2008 14:36 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Please unsubscribe me from this email list. Thank you.

Re: The Cactus/JUnit-Task problem

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, [Petar, it would be good if you subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it is not that high traffic anyway] last night I chatted with Petar about the backwards incompatible change to the JUnit task we introduced in Ant 1.7.0 that broke Cactus. Cactus' Ant task extends th

Re: The Cactus/JUnit-Task problem

This sounds excellent. However, since Cactus replaces the execute method, would it not need to add code to call setupJUnitDelegate() Peter On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > [Petar, it would be good if you subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it

Re: The Cactus/JUnit-Task problem

Hi everybody, I like the solution of separating the configuration of the delegate object in a new method most,also. But the point is that this solution will be really hard for several reasons. 1) First of all, as Peter said, Cactus extends JUnit task and so we override the execute method. So we ha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24106] - Suites are not reported correctly in JUnitReport

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu