Re: [VOTE] add Nicolas Lalevée as committer

Le mercredi 13 février 2008, Xavier Hanin a écrit : > Hi All, > > Nicolas Lalevée has contributed a lot of patches to Ivy and IvyDE [1 to > 10], and has been actively involved in several discussions, especially > about IvyDE. He is always fair when giving his opinion, and often try to > help ot

Re: [DISCUSS] release Ivy 2.0.0-beta2?

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Xavier Hanin wrote: > > So, if I understand correctly, right now settings/defaultCache is the > > default for both resolution and repository cache; > > settings/resolutionCacheDir overrides it for resolution, caches/basedir > > overrides it for repository, and cach

Re: Store pom dependency Managment in extra data

I think we need to distinguish two kind of extra metadata: those used to identify the module, and those which are pure information. IMO extra attributes on the info tag are good candidates for the first kind of extra meta information: - because it's how they work now - because the info tag attribut

Re: [VOTE] add Nicolas Lalevée as committer

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Nicolas Lalevée < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le mercredi 13 février 2008, Xavier Hanin a écrit : > > Hi All, > > > > Nicolas Lalevée has contributed a lot of patches to Ivy and IvyDE [1 to > > 10], and has been actively involved in several discussions, especia

Re: [DISCUSS] release Ivy 2.0.0-beta2?

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Adrian Sandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Xavier Hanin wrote: > > > > So, if I understand correctly, right now settings/defaultCache is the > > > default for both resolution and repository cache; > > > settings/resolutionCacheDir o

RE: Store pom dependency Managment in extra data

> -Original Message- > From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: jeudi 14 février 2008 9:44 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: Store pom dependency Managment in extra data > > I think we need to distinguish two kind of extra metadata: those used to > identify the module,

Re: Store pom dependency Managment in extra data

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: jeudi 14 février 2008 9:44 > > To: Ant Developers List > > Subject: Re: Store pom dependency Managment in extra data > > > > I t

Re: [DISCUSS] release Ivy 2.0.0-beta2?

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Xavier Hanin wrote: > > Would you like me to work on it? Or add a comment to IVY-399? > > I think we have a little less than a week before we cut the beta2. If you > can do the job (code, reference doc and junit changes) in this timeframe, > it's more than welcome!

Re: [DISCUSS] release Ivy 2.0.0-beta2?

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Adrian Sandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Xavier Hanin wrote: > > > > Would you like me to work on it? Or add a comment to IVY-399? > > > > I think we have a little less than a week before we cut the beta2. If > you > > can do the

Re: import re-imports top-level build.xml

Peter Reilly wrote: On Jan 28, 2008 10:55 PM, Vallon, Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if is given a path to the original (top-level) build-file, > it does not consider it a duplicate import, and imports it (again) ... That does sound like a bug!. Please file a bugzilla report. Filed

Re: [DISCUSS] release Ivy 2.0.0-beta2?

Xavier Hanin wrote: > The cache element under the caches element is parsed automatically using > the > same logic as Ant tasks, using the Configurator class. At the beginning of > the XmlSettingsParser class you have an array of configuration elements, > including caches, which tells Ivy should au

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42275] - running ant off a network share can cause Ant to fail

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Bug 43234

Dear Sir/Madam, I am experiencing the exact same problems as described in this bug (43234: Get random failure after multiple sshexec calls: Remote command failed with exit status -1). This bug was submitted on 2007-08-29, so I was wondering if there is any fix/workaround available? I'm currentl

Re: Bug 43234

Hi, 2008/2/15, Stephen Wrathall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am experiencing the exact same problems as described in this bug > (43234: Get random failure after multiple sshexec calls: Remote command > failed with exit status -1). > This bug was submitted on 2007-08-29, so I was wondering if there