[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project dotnet-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

2007-08-01 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project dotnet-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

2007-08-01 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39122] - uptodate treats an outdated target as up to date

2007-08-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Target.getTasks returns UnknownElement

2007-08-01 Thread James Mao
Hi, Sorry, if you receive this twice, i sent it to the user list as well. I'm trying to parse the build.xml myself, and tried to get the tasks object with the following code File buildFile = new File("c:/myproject/build.xml"); Project project = new Project(); project.init();

Re: Functional testing with AntUnit

2007-08-01 Thread Paul King
Chris Connelly wrote: Hello, I apologize in advance if this is the wrong forum for this question. My organization is looking to replace some home-grown, in-house test automation tools with open source tools where possible. I've prototyped some solutions using Ant and AntUnit, and was impres

Re: svn commit: r557062 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/LoadProperties.java

2007-08-01 Thread Paul King
Peter Reilly wrote: On 7/17/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The refactoring is much bigger than the formatting here, FYI... wanted to reassure you that I am taking your comments to heart, Peter. Cool! I think perhaps we should push to remove all checkstyle errors for ant1.8. At work,