On Fri, 11 May 2007, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would this be suitable for the svn sandbox?
Absolutely yes.
> Are there any objections to my committing my progress so far?
Go ahead. The sandbox is there for committers to play.
Stefan
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: kevj
Date: Fri May 11 23:09:06 2007
New Revision: 537344
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=537344
Log:
-new ResourceContains condition
Added:
ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/ResourceContains.java
Added:
ant/cor
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 12 May 2007 3:08 PM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Antunit timings inaccurate?
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just writing some antunit tests for a new condition and got
> this in the output:
>
> [antuni
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affe
Author: bodewig
Date: Sat May 12 12:53:08 2007
New Revision: 537505
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=537505
Log:
new signatures
Modified:
ant/core/trunk/KEYS
Modified: ant/core/trunk/KEYS
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/KEYS?view=diff&rev=537505&r1=537504&r2=5
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1 p
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue a
Hi Steve,
Not sure about this. Why take a string? Its not being resolved relative
to the project base, and is doing work that ant should do.
This is why I wanted someone to check over my resource stuff as I
wasn't sure it was correct.
If we want to look in a resource for a string
-the test
Author: kevj
Date: Sat May 12 21:07:41 2007
New Revision: 537549
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=537549
Log:
-resource may not be a file
Modified:
ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/antlib.xml
Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/a
Hi all,
Looking through the bugzilla I came across, #28736 requesting a retry
attribute for the ftp task.
I thought instead that a generic Retry task container may be useful.
I've quickly thrown this together and first tests (using get) seem to
be fine, does anyone have an objection to adding th
There is one of these in WebTest:
http://webtest.canoo.com/webtest/manual/retry.html
But it might be nice to have one outside WebTest as well.
You might want to guard against NoRetries being equal to 0
or change the code to skip the perform in that case. It
wouldn't be the usual case but migh
11 matches
Mail list logo
