Author: kevj
Date: Mon May 7 00:01:12 2007
New Revision: 535764
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=535764
Log:
-typo
Modified:
ant/core/trunk/xdocs/projects.xml
Modified: ant/core/trunk/xdocs/projects.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/xdocs/projects.xml?view=
ups - thanks.
Just applied the patch with whitespace check - not language check ;)
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Montag, 7. Mai 2007 09:01
>An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Betreff: svn commit: r535764 - /ant/core/trunk/xdocs/projects.
no worries ;)
On 5/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ups - thanks.
Just applied the patch with whitespace check - not language check ;)
Jan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Xavier Hanin wrote:
On 5/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > we'd need a metadata tree mapping antlibs to well known packages,
>> > but that is not too hard. JSON, perhaps.
>>
>> Not sure. Who'd maintain it?
>
>It should be some xml format.
>I think that it should be on the
On 5/7/07, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Xavier Hanin wrote:
> On 5/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > we'd need a metadata tree mapping antlibs to well known packages,
>> >> > but that is not too hard. JSON, perhaps.
>> >>
>> >> Not sure. Who'd maintain it?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 4 May 2007 5:27 PM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: auto download of antlibs
>
>
> One thing I've been thinking of this week is how could we
> work with Ivy for automatic antlib download.
>
> N
> -Original Message-
> From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 4 May 2007 5:56 PM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: auto download of antlibs
>
> On 5/4/07, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > One thing I've been thinking of this week is how cou
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 3. an antlib resolver would do the mapping from antlib package to
> > artifacts (problem one),
>
> actually a pretty big problem.
Which may explain why two JSRs are dealing with the subject:
http://jcp.org/en/j
