remove from defaults.properties

2007-01-04 Thread Jan.Materne
I suggest removing the jspc-namebinding from the default.properties [1]: - is deprecated for a long time - it causes trouble like [2] - it's one step on the road of moving optional tasks to AntLibs Jan [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools /ant/taskdefs/d

Re: remove from defaults.properties

2007-01-04 Thread Kevin Jackson
I suggest removing the jspc-namebinding from the default.properties [1]: - is deprecated for a long time - it causes trouble like [2] - it's one step on the road of moving optional tasks to AntLibs I agree, at least we can move it to the deprecated area of the default.properties Kev -

svn commit: r492463 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/defaults.properties

2007-01-04 Thread jhm
Author: jhm Date: Thu Jan 4 01:09:24 2007 New Revision: 492463 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=492463 Log: is deprecated in favor to Tomcats own jspc task. Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/defaults.properties Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/

AW: remove from defaults.properties

2007-01-04 Thread Jan.Materne
>> I suggest removing the jspc-namebinding from the default.properties [1]: >> - is deprecated for a long time >> - it causes trouble like [2] >> - it's one step on the road of moving optional tasks to AntLibs > >I agree, at least we can move it to the deprecated area of the >default.properties

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

2007-01-04 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

Re: remove from defaults.properties

2007-01-04 Thread Steve Loughran
Kevin Jackson wrote: I suggest removing the jspc-namebinding from the default.properties [1]: - is deprecated for a long time - it causes trouble like [2] - it's one step on the road of moving optional tasks to AntLibs I agree, at least we can move it to the deprecated area of the default.prop

svn commit: r492549 - in /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks: ear.html war.html

2007-01-04 Thread jhm
Author: jhm Date: Thu Jan 4 04:46:08 2007 New Revision: 492549 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=492549 Log: and inherit attributes and elements from . Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks/ear.html ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks/war.html Modified: ant/cor

svn commit: r492552 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks/jar.html

2007-01-04 Thread jhm
Author: jhm Date: Thu Jan 4 04:48:22 2007 New Revision: 492552 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=492552 Log: Add an example how to store a program-version info in the manifest. Make the code more readable. Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks/jar.html Modified: ant/c

Re: svn commit: r492552 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks/jar.html

2007-01-04 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Jan, I think the standard name for an attribute meaning program version is Implementation-Version Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 12:48:22 - Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: svn commit: r492552 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/m

svn commit: r492592 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks/jar.html

2007-01-04 Thread jhm
Author: jhm Date: Thu Jan 4 07:08:09 2007 New Revision: 492592 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=492592 Log: Use the attribute name as provided in the jar-docs and suggested by Antoine. "Update" Ant. Use more "application information". Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreT

AW: svn commit: r492552 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks/jar.html

2007-01-04 Thread Jan.Materne
I changed it. Thanks. Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2007 15:51 >An: Ant Developers List >Betreff: Re: svn commit: r492552 - >/ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks/jar.html > >Hello Jan, > >I think th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41284] - dependset throws NullPointerException

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41285] - delete and symlink tasks do not delete a symlink if its target does not exist

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41284] - dependset throws NullPointerException

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41284] - dependset throws NullPointerException

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41291] New: - Recursive FilterSet fails when a token in recursed value appears more than once

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41292] New: - javadoc task: sourcepath for JDK sources broken

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41291] - Recursive FilterSet fails when a token in recursed value appears more than once

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41285] - delete and symlink tasks do not delete a symlink if its target does not exist

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41291] - Recursive FilterSet fails when a token in recursed value appears more than once

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41291] - Recursive FilterSet fails when a token in recursed value appears more than once

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41291] - Recursive FilterSet fails when a token in recursed value appears more than once

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41285] - delete and symlink tasks do not delete a symlink if its target does not exist

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41291] - Recursive FilterSet fails when a token in recursed value appears more than once

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41285] - delete and symlink tasks do not delete a symlink if its target does not exist

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41291] - Recursive FilterSet fails when a token in recursed value appears more than once

2007-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu