DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41024] - Problem with Input task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: seemingly infinite loop in Project class

On 11/23/06, Dave Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: protected void fireMessageLogged(Project project, String message, int priority) { fireMessageLogged(project, message, priority); } That does incorrect. It possible should be fireMessageL

Re: .ant/lib at project level

Peter Reilly wrote: > I have been setting up a new project here and > had been wondering how to allow antunit and ant-contrib > to be added without too much messing around. > I do not want to get the developers to place the antlibs > in ~/.ant/lib or $ANT_HOME/lib, - different projects > will use

Re: Recorder

subir bhaumik wrote: Hi I am not getting reply on ant user forum that's why i am posting here. I am using ant API programmatically for build rather than writing build.xml. It's o.k. Now i want the compilation record in a log file.I can get it by writing the following in build.xml.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40908] - Updating ScriptRunner for bsf 2.4.0 plus some minor enhancements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Recorder

Steve Loughran wrote: > subir bhaumik wrote: >> compile: >> [javac] Compiling 4 source files to D:\subir\Downloads\example1\build >> [javac] D:\subir\Downloads\example1\src\Adder.java:16: ';' expected >> [javac] } >> [javac] ^ >> [javac] 1 error > > That output comes from javac, which uses

Re: .ant/lib at project level

On 11/24/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: > I have been setting up a new project here and > had been wondering how to allow antunit and ant-contrib > to be added without too much messing around. > I do not want to get the developers to place the antlibs > in

Re: seemingly infinite loop in Project class

Peter Reilly schreef: On 11/23/06, Dave Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: protected void fireMessageLogged(Project project, String message, int priority) { fireMessageLogged(project, message, priority); } That does incorrect. It possible

JDK 1.2 compatibility

As you might have noticed. about a week ago I wrote about some troubles on jdk 1.3 which by now are fixed. However I didn't get any reaction on the fact that the official builds do not work at all for JDK 1.2. I am not too concerned about dropping support for JDK 1.2, but we should agree on it

svn commit: r478939 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java

Author: jkf Date: Fri Nov 24 10:50:23 2006 New Revision: 478939 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=478939 Log: Fix error found by Dave (and made by me) Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Proje

Re: seemingly infinite loop in Project class

On 11/24/06, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Reilly schreef: > On 11/23/06, Dave Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> protected void fireMessageLogged(Project project, String message, >> int priority) { >> fireMessageLogged(proje

Re: JDK 1.2 compatibility

On 11/24/06, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As you might have noticed. about a week ago I wrote about some troubles on jdk 1.3 which by now are fixed. However I didn't get any reaction on the fact that the official builds do not work at all for JDK 1.2. What were the issues (I canno

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41039] New: - ant.bat exit strategy improvements and issues

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41039] - ant.bat exit strategy improvements and issues

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JDK 1.2 compatibility

Peter Reilly schreef: On 11/24/06, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As you might have noticed. about a week ago I wrote about some troubles on jdk 1.3 which by now are fixed. However I didn't get any reaction on the fact that the official builds do not work at all for JDK 1.2. What w

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40972] - Directory Deletion Dont Work Properly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r479017 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Delete.java src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/delete-test.xml

Author: jkf Date: Fri Nov 24 14:02:28 2006 New Revision: 479017 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=479017 Log: Pr 40972 Directory Deletion Dont Work Properly Added: ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/delete-test.xml Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW ant/core/trunk/s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40972] - Directory Deletion Dont Work Properly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r479019 - /ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/delete-test.xml

Author: jkf Date: Fri Nov 24 14:04:58 2006 New Revision: 479019 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=479019 Log: Removed superfluous comment Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/delete-test.xml Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/delete-test.xml URL:

Re: JDK 1.2 compatibility

Martijn Kruithof wrote: I couldn't get jdk 1.2 to run on linux. Nor could I last time I tried. (Which was just to compile Ant.) Gets a symbol linkage error. Must be using some ancient version of glibc. Note that JDK 1.2 is formally "end-of-lifed" by Sun; JDK 1.3 is about to be as well (as so