[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

Re: Default excludes and Subversion on Windows

On 19 Aug 2006, at 02:06, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If we reject automatically handling _svn directories (as a "hack" as said by svn-people), we should document it in the manual of and svn-antlib with a reference (and a quotation) of th

Re: Default excludes and Subversion on Windows

Kev Jackson wrote: On 19 Aug 2006, at 02:06, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If we reject automatically handling _svn directories (as a "hack" as said by svn-people), we should document it in the manual of and svn-antlib with a reference (a

Re: Default excludes and Subversion on Windows

Kev Jackson wrote: > > On 19 Aug 2006, at 02:06, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> If we reject automatically handling _svn directories (as a "hack" as >>> said by svn-people), we should document it in the manual of >>> and svn-antlib wit

[VOTE] Release of first beta of Ant 1.7.0

Hi, Since the alpha release last month, there has been little feedback concerning required changes/fixes. I know that most people will have trunk + minor revisions on their machines, and it's time for all of us to consider which of your personal minor revisions are going to go into a beta. We al

release instructions for antlibs

Hi, does someone want to write the ReleasInstructions for the Antlibs ? Otherwise I will improvise it myself. Regards, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: release instructions for antlibs

On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > does someone want to write the ReleasInstructions for the Antlibs ? > > Otherwise I will improvise it myself. I think antlibs can and should be released independent of Ant itself,you should focus on Ant 1.7 and not try to rel

.NET Antlib plans

Hi all, I'd like to copy the existing .NET Ant tasks to the .NET Antlib and deprecate the ones in Ant proper. Any objections? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release of first beta of Ant 1.7.0

On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose to build a first beta on Sunday, August 27th > > the tag in Subversion would be : ANT_170_B1 > the version returned by ant -version would be : ant 1.7.0Beta1 +1 > As discussed in a previous vote, we will not create

Re: [VOTE] Release of first beta of Ant 1.7.0

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I propose to build a first beta on Sunday, August 27th the tag in Subversion would be : ANT_170_B1 the version returned by ant -version would be : ant 1.7.0Beta1 +1 As discussed in a previous vot

svn commit: r432860 - /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/PlainAntUnitListener.java

Author: bodewig Date: Sat Aug 19 11:56:24 2006 New Revision: 432860 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432860&view=rev Log: make report file name prettier Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/PlainAntUnitListener.java Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/sr

svn commit: r432863 - in /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit: BaseAntUnitListener.java PlainAntUnitListener.java

Author: bodewig Date: Sat Aug 19 12:13:42 2006 New Revision: 432863 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432863&view=rev Log: factor out some code that may come handy when implementing the XML listener Added: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/BaseAntUnitListener.java

svn commit: r432865 - /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/PlainAntUnitListener.java

Author: bodewig Date: Sat Aug 19 12:27:50 2006 New Revision: 432865 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432865&view=rev Log: cleanup Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/PlainAntUnitListener.java Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/a

svn commit: r432866 - in /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit: BaseAntUnitListener.java PlainAntUnitListener.java

Author: bodewig Date: Sat Aug 19 12:34:26 2006 New Revision: 432866 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432866&view=rev Log: need to make extension configurable Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/BaseAntUnitListener.java ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/m

Re: [VOTE] Release of first beta of Ant 1.7.0

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, Since the alpha release last month, there has been little feedback concerning required changes/fixes. I know that most people will have trunk + minor revisions on their machines, and it's time for all of us to consider which of your personal minor revisions are g

svn commit: r432871 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/DOMElementWriter.java

Author: bodewig Date: Sat Aug 19 13:13:36 2006 New Revision: 432871 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432871&view=rev Log: make XML decl accessible Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/DOMElementWriter.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/ut

svn commit: r432873 - in /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src: etc/testcases/antunit.xml main/org/apache/ant/antunit/XMLAntUnitListener.java main/org/apache/ant/antunit/antlib.xml

Author: bodewig Date: Sat Aug 19 13:33:08 2006 New Revision: 432873 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432873&view=rev Log: XML listener, mostly complete. I intend to add documentation and stylesheets that allow junitreport to work on the report format later. Added: ant/antlibs/antunit/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40261] - Support for FTP Quote action on FTP task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40249] - Out of Memory exceptions are near impossible to find the source of.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: .NET Antlib plans

Hi Stefan, no objections. I never did any DotNet work with ant. Regards, Antoine Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to copy the existing .NET Ant tasks to the .NET Antlib and > deprecate the ones in Ant proper. Any objections? > > Stefan > > -

Re: release instructions for antlibs

Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> does someone want to write the ReleasInstructions for the Antlibs ? >> >> Otherwise I will improvise it myself. >> > > I think antlibs can and should be released independent of Ant > itself,y

Re: .NET Antlib plans

I am using them a lot, but I do not mind separating them from main ANT. - Alexey. On 8/19/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Stefan, no objections. I never did any DotNet work with ant. Regards, Antoine Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to copy the existing .

Re: .NET Antlib plans

Alexey-- Theres a entirely new project to configure build environment for .NET called .NET ANTor NANT downloads available at http://nant.sourceforge.net/ HTH, Martin -- * This email message and any files transmitted with it cont

Re: .NET Antlib plans

I know, but I already used ANT for Java and C++ components. ANT is good enough for .Net too. For pure .Net builds I use MSBuild (just to minimize build dependencies). Also ANT seems having much better support. - Alexey. On 8/19/06, Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alexey-- Theres a en