[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.7.0 beta1

+1 On 7/22/06, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After some off-list negotiations, Antoine and myself are agreeing to be co-release managers of Ant 1.7. I will personally build 1.7.0beta1 or pre-release and post the distribution on people.apache.org/~kevj for testing/evaluation by Friday n

[PATCH] Removing OPTIMIZE_TOKEN_MANAGER from JavaCC task

Hi all - Just wanted to submit a small patch for the JavaCC task; the OPTIMIZE_TOKEN_MANAGER option is no longer supported as of JavaCC 4.0. Comments/questions welcome, Yours, Tom Index: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/javacc/JavaCC.java =

question

Hi, I've prepared a patch which enables batching of files passed to java compiler (only modern javac). Batch size is configurable via javac task attributes. The purpose of the patch is to reduce memory footprint and, in some cases, greatly improve compilation speed on very large projects (2+

Re: question

Open a bugzilla enhancement, and attach an svn diff -u patch against SVN head. Can you detail a little bit more what is "batching" for . I've never heard a it. Thanks, --DD On 7/25/06, Sergey Yevtushenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I've prepared a patch which enables batching of files pass

Re: question

Dominique Devienne wrote: Open a bugzilla enhancement, and attach an svn diff -u patch against SVN head. OK. Can you detail a little bit more what is "batching" for . I've never heard a it. It just passes files to compiler in batches of specified size instead of passing all files which need t

Re: question

But this doesn't work if a batch of files is not self contained, i.e. depends on classes in the next batch. Using batching has the potential to break a compilation that would otherwise work fine in one go. It's always a little scary to hear of 20K+ files in a project. There should be independent

Re: Open AntUnit Issues

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 24 Jul 2006, at 12:02, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * RessourceCollection instead of FileSet I've just quickly hacked this in - tested by using the re

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21042] - Setting XSL parameter to input filename when processed whole directory.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: question

Dominique Devienne wrote: But this doesn't work if a batch of files is not self contained, i.e. depends on classes in the next batch. Using batching has the potential to break a compilation that would otherwise work fine in one go. Well, so far testing does not expose this issue. It's always a

Re: question

OK, to be more precise, it's dangerous to batch the files when one explicitly resets the sourcepath in . You don't see a problem, because SUN's Javac is "griddy", so if a source in batch#1 requires a file in next batches, it will find it anyway through the sourcepath. So batching might compile mor

Re: question

Dominique Devienne wrote: OK, to be more precise, it's dangerous to batch the files when one explicitly resets the sourcepath in . You don't see a problem, because SUN's Javac is "griddy", so if a source in batch#1 requires a file in next batches, it will find it anyway through the sourcepath. So

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40093] - ant.PropertyHelper reference not passed to called build

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40093] - ant.PropertyHelper reference not passed to called build

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40093] - ant.PropertyHelper reference not passed to called build

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40093] - ant.PropertyHelper reference not passed to called build

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40093] - ant.PropertyHelper reference not passed to called build

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: question

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So it's safer than I initialy thought, but might not do what you > thought it does either. In any case, using batching + sourcepath > *is* dangerous. As would be using batching with one of the non-greedy compiler supported by An

Re: question

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Sergey Yevtushenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dominique Devienne wrote: >> I would advise: 1) To use an attribute name similar to 's, >> which does batching. > > I've used 'batchSize' which is by default set to "-1" which means > "disable batching". uses maxparallel and a

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.7.0 beta1

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Even if everything goes pear-shaped, it can be fixed with a follow >>> up release, or whatever it takes. >> >> What's wrong with pears?

svn commit: r425605 - in /ant/antlibs/common/trunk: NOTICE NOTICE.template build.xml

Author: bodewig Date: Tue Jul 25 21:21:39 2006 New Revision: 425605 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425605&view=rev Log: apply new NOTICE file policy Added: ant/antlibs/common/trunk/NOTICE.template - copied, changed from r425602, ant/antlibs/common/trunk/NOTICE Removed: ant/an

svn commit: r425607 - /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/NOTICE

Author: bodewig Date: Tue Jul 25 21:24:01 2006 New Revision: 425607 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425607&view=rev Log: adapt to common NOTICE file format Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/NOTICE Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/NOTICE URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/antli

svn commit: r425610 - /ant/antlibs/dotnet/trunk/NOTICE

Author: bodewig Date: Tue Jul 25 21:26:02 2006 New Revision: 425610 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425610&view=rev Log: add required NOTICE file Added: ant/antlibs/dotnet/trunk/NOTICE (with props) Added: ant/antlibs/dotnet/trunk/NOTICE URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/antlibs/

svn commit: r425611 - /ant/antlibs/dotnet/branches/Ant_1.6.2_compatible/NOTICE

Author: bodewig Date: Tue Jul 25 21:26:41 2006 New Revision: 425611 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425611&view=rev Log: add required NOTICE file Added: ant/antlibs/dotnet/branches/Ant_1.6.2_compatible/NOTICE - copied unchanged from r425610, ant/antlibs/dotnet/trunk/NOTICE -

svn commit: r425612 - /ant/antlibs/svn/trunk/NOTICE

Author: bodewig Date: Tue Jul 25 21:27:48 2006 New Revision: 425612 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425612&view=rev Log: add required NOTICE file Added: ant/antlibs/svn/trunk/NOTICE (with props) Added: ant/antlibs/svn/trunk/NOTICE URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/antlibs/svn/tr

svn commit: r425613 - /ant/sandbox/antlibs/vss/NOTICE

Author: bodewig Date: Tue Jul 25 21:29:31 2006 New Revision: 425613 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425613&view=rev Log: add required NOTICE file Added: ant/sandbox/antlibs/vss/NOTICE (with props) Added: ant/sandbox/antlibs/vss/NOTICE URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/sandbox/an

svn commit: r425614 - /ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/trunk/NOTICE

Author: bodewig Date: Tue Jul 25 21:30:32 2006 New Revision: 425614 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425614&view=rev Log: add required NOTICE file Added: ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/trunk/NOTICE (with props) Added: ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/trunk/NOTICE URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/

svn commit: r425623 - in /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk: docs/antunit.html src/etc/testcases/antunit.xml src/etc/testcases/antunit/base.xml src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/AntUnit.java

Author: bodewig Date: Tue Jul 25 21:58:57 2006 New Revision: 425623 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425623&view=rev Log: 'test' is not an AntUnit test target Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/docs/antunit.html ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/etc/testcases/antunit.xml ant/antlibs