To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affe
Just out of curiousity:
What would so bad introducing an "expression language"?
After all, there's no need to express everything in (clumsy) XML just
because
we are able to do so. I believe that an expression language, escpecially
for
testing, would simplify Ant scripting considerably.
Wolfga
Dear Ant developers,
We are using Ant for building, deploying and testing real large projects (>5
Mio LOC). So our scripts became more and more complex workflow scripts instead
of simple Ant-scripts.
I do strongly believe that the simple change of more complex (expression
language like) if and
On 23 Jun 2006, at 16:24, Riedel Thomas ((KSFD 121)) wrote:
r building, deploying and testing real large projects (>5 Mio LOC).
So our scripts became more and more complex workflow scripts
instead of simple Ant-scripts.
I do strongly believe that the simple change of more complex
(expressi
>Don't macrodef/scriptdef and friends help out here? I mean
>it's possible to embed an entire scripting language (BeanShell
>etc) inside an Ant build file, do these not provide enough
>flexibility for what you need?
Would be very difficult I think.
I think they prefer a
or something like th
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Paul Mackay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has the possibility of adding multiple conditions to the target 'if'
and 'unless' attributes ever been considered?
Yes, but it hasn't come up often after Ant 1.4 ;-)
Are there any reasons why this change woul
Having been doing some work documenting scripting recently, I want to
note some current limitations with ant's script support.
-no automatic check for attributes/elements declared. The script code
needs to do that themselves, which leads to...
-bad handling of BuildExceptions raised in scr
We have written a large library of own very sophisticated ant tasks for
all the high level stuff. What I am thinking is that especially for the
work-flow control it would be great to steer the flow between different
targets via complex if-statements. I see the point that Ant should be
easy and desc
Riedel Thomas (KSFD 121) wrote:
We have written a large library of own very sophisticated ant tasks for
all the high level stuff. What I am thinking is that especially for the
work-flow control it would be great to steer the flow between different
targets via complex if-statements. I see the poin
Yes I agree the kind of our Ant-usage might be a bit beyond horizon. We
are doing continious integration for a 5 Mio LOC project, generic
automated junit testing, automatic deploying into a production like
server pool, online testing, web-testing, automated metrics generation
for the architecture g
I'm a bit concerned about your usage of Ant, really, because when the
build begins to be than conditional, it's a bad 'smell' to me, or if
you prefer a tale-tell sign than a different approach might be
warranted. Note that I'm not trying to insult you in any way,
everyone's free to use or abuse An
About property expansion - many languages use the same syntax for inline
property substitution. It may be good not to expand properties
automatically.
- Alexey.
On 6/23/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Having been doing some work documenting scripting recently, I want to
note som
Author: antoine
Date: Fri Jun 23 11:23:00 2006
New Revision: 416788
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=416788&view=rev
Log:
ignored optional jars
Modified:
ant/core/trunk/lib/optional/ (props changed)
Propchange: ant/core/trunk/lib/optional/
-
Hello Brett,
Thanks for your help.
I have applied property changes to the lib/optional directory.
I realize now that I can simply delete the .svnignore files so that other
people do not get confused into thinking that these files are useful.
Regards,
Antoine
Original-Nachricht --
Author: mbenson
Date: Fri Jun 23 13:33:16 2006
New Revision: 416815
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=416815&view=rev
Log:
ws
Modified:
ant/core/trunk/fetch.xml
Modified: ant/core/trunk/fetch.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/fetch.xml?rev=416815&r1=416814&r2=416815&v
Author: mbenson
Date: Fri Jun 23 15:16:41 2006
New Revision: 416828
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=416828&view=rev
Log:
Extracted get-m2.xml from fetch.xml; modified so that a single run is
sufficient even when DLing the m2 tasks.
Added:
ant/core/trunk/get-m2.xml (with props)
Modifie
Author: mbenson
Date: Fri Jun 23 15:30:47 2006
New Revision: 416830
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=416830&view=rev
Log:
rename get-m2 dest.dir to m2.dest.dir for better portability;
is more compact than a nested in
fetch/pickDest
Modified:
ant/core/trunk/fetch.xml
ant/core/trunk
Can I assume this assjack is subscribed to ant-dev as
every time I commit I get a bounce from him? Can we
unsubscribe him?
-Matt
--- Mail Delivery Subsystem
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 23:35:44 +0100
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PRO
Author: mbenson
Date: Fri Jun 23 15:41:47 2006
New Revision: 416831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=416831&view=rev
Log:
Only DL if the _artifact_ was not found;
taskdef anytime the _antlib_ wasn't found.
Modified:
ant/core/trunk/get-m2.xml
Modified: ant/core/trunk/get-m2.xml
URL:
htt
19 matches
Mail list logo
