Also fine with me.
Peter
On 11/10/05, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Stefan (and others),
>
> fine with me.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I've thought about the three-way votes needed here again and think it
> >is easiest to vote
Craeg Strong wrote:
Dominique Devienne wrote:
Changing an interface is a no-no of course.
So far I think I like #1 best, i.e. adding a few overrides to the log
methods in ProjectComponent to support an additional category. I'm not
sure we'd need hierarchical categories a la Log4J or
java.ut
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1 p
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue a
Steve Loughran wrote:
Actually, I quite like the listener approach. We just need an extended
listener; there is no reason the -listener command can't handle both
types.
The nice thing about a listener is that it lets an IDE do fancy things
like list all properties.
if we are going to do th
In accordance with section 4.6 of the antlibs subproject charter, an
antlib needs a PMC majority to be accepted as a "proper" antlib.
Majority means at least 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s (section 4.7).
Each Antlib also needs at least three committers with at least one PMC
member among them. If you
In accordance with section 4.6 of the antlibs subproject charter, an
antlib needs a PMC majority to be accepted as a "proper" antlib.
Majority means at least 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s (section 4.7).
Each Antlib also needs at least three committers with at least one PMC
member among them. If you
In accordance with section 4.6 of the antlibs subproject charter, an
antlib needs a PMC majority to be accepted as a "proper" antlib.
Majority means at least 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s (section 4.7).
Each Antlib also needs at least three committers with at least one PMC
member among them. If you
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Shall the .NET antlib be promoted?
[ ] Yes (i.e. +1)
[ ] and I want to become a committer to it
[ ] No
Hi,
it seems there is a mix-up in the votes, all three have the same voting
statement.
Martijn
---
Shall the .NET^w antlib(s) be promoted?
[+1] Yes (i.e. +1)
[?] and I want to become a committer to it
[ ] No
I'd say yes to all 3
my 2p
Kev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>>Shall the .NET antlib be promoted?
>>
>>[ ] Yes (i.e. +1)
>>[ ] and I want to become a committer to it
>>[ ] No
>>
>>
> Hi,
>
> it seems there is a mix-up in the votes, all three have the same
> votin
In accordance with section 4.6 of the antlibs subproject charter, an
antlib needs a PMC majority to be accepted as a "proper" antlib.
Majority means at least 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s (section 4.7).
Each Antlib also needs at least three committers with at least one PMC
member among them. If you
In accordance with section 4.6 of the antlibs subproject charter, an
antlib needs a PMC majority to be accepted as a "proper" antlib.
Majority means at least 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s (section 4.7).
Each Antlib also needs at least three committers with at least one PMC
member among them. If you
13 matches
Mail list logo
