Re: How to pipe output to input?

Well! I am ashamed to say I had never encountered the mkfifo command. My only contact with "named pipes" [snip interesting pipes discussion] My only contact with named pipes was in the abomination that was WebSphere 3.5.1 (you had choices of Java, Corba or "Named Pipes" as a config opti

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35476] - XMLLogger causes OutOfMemoryError

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35499] - junit batchtest fails if fileset created via zipfileset

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35464] - Add a dry run mode

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit BatchTest.java

jkf 2005/06/27 10:59:36 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit BatchTest.java Log: PR: 35499 Classname may not contain / or \ so it is safe to convert both to . to get the class name. (Zipfilesets do not necessarily contain Fi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35499] - junit batchtest fails if fileset created via zipfileset

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35499] - junit batchtest fails if fileset created via zipfileset

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse)

Ullrich was kind enough to provide me data gathered by my own performance listener, which shows timings for tasks as well as targets: Timing by tasks in Ant 1.6.2:in Ant 1.6.5 --- -- -- -- --- -- 19.578,0 ms 175,2%24x antcall62.235,0 ms 189,0% 5

Re: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse)

Dominique Devienne wrote: Ullrich was kind enough to provide me data gathered by my own performance listener, which shows timings for tasks as well as targets: Timing by tasks in Ant 1.6.2:in Ant 1.6.5 --- -- -- -- --- -- 19.578,0 ms 175,2%24x ant