DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30254] New: - xslt/style task not taking classpath into account

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Mike Jennings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Ok here is the argument about being not such a good idea > (in general). > > 1) For every contition you need to test in the whole of > your buildfile > > you need to come up with yet another property that will be use for > > testing it. >

Re: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As per if/unless itself, I really would like to explore more what > some people have suggested about having a richer language than just > set/unset. PropertyHelper? IOW, I think we already have the infrastructure needed to

RE: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As per if/unless itself, I really would like to explore > more what some > > people have suggested about having a richer language than just > > set/unset. > >

Re: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > As per if/unless itself, I really would like to explore >> more what some >> > peopl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30216] - exec cmd resultproperty yields different value depending on machine

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Phil Weighill-Smith
My vote for a "language" within if/unless elements is to use XPath (1 or 2). Pretty powerful and standard within the XML domain! You could even think of supporting path expressions that access the entities (targets, properties, types etc.) within the current Ant build file and could provide some su

RE: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > As per if/unless i

Re: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Still, do if/unless get property expanded (do not remember >> anymore). > > No, you are correct. Well, unfortunately its worse. if/unless on a task or a n

Re: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But if we tell people that in if/unless now you can put expressions > and then give no implementation in core... We already tell people they can plug in whatever kind of strange thing they want into ${xyz} expansion - withou

RE: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Phil Weighill-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > My vote for a "language" within if/unless elements is to use > XPath (1 or 2). Pretty powerful and standard within the XML > domain! You could even think of supporting path expressions > that access the entities (targets, properties, ty

Re: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > if/unless on a task or a nested element of a task > are normal > attributes and as such get expanded. if/unless on > doesn't > get expanded. > Doh, that's right back to THAT big argument again. But if the same principles apply, would b

Re: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: Phil Weighill-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Finally, it would even be possible to drop the delimiter and >> evaluate the expression as an XPath instead of as a property >> name if there are any "illegal" propert

Re: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Steve Loughran
Phil Weighill-Smith wrote: My vote for a "language" within if/unless elements is to use XPath (1 or 2). Pretty powerful and standard within the XML domain! You could even think of supporting path expressions that access the entities (targets, properties, types etc.) within the current Ant build fil

Re: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doh, that's right back to THAT big argument again. 8-) > But if the same principles apply, would be restricted from > expression evaluation for the same reasons as it is restricted from > property evaluation, no? Probably yes.

Re: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Mike Jennings
I haven't created hundreds of ANT build files, but my intuition is that being restricted from property evaluation isn't that bad. IMHO testing for the presence/absence of a property is fine at the level. I don't mind introducing yet another property name just for the conditional execution of a w

Re: new Task subclass

2004-07-22 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > > But if the same principles apply, would > be restricted from > > expression evaluation for the same reasons as it > is restricted from > > property evaluation, no? > > Probably yes. The only things where I see a > technical reason are > de

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30176] - ftp rename command

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29811] - move action for FTP task

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29811] - move action for FTP task

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30185] - regexp.html apparently not branched in CVS

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16879] - CvsChangeLog attr "start" causes IllegalArgumentException

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19690] - Cvs log & CvsChangeLog are painfully slow

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19690] - Cvs log & CvsChangeLog are painfully slow

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19807] - CvsChangeLog to support revision tag parameter

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30185] - regexp.html apparently not branched in CVS

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30161] - [PATCH] Impossible to use implicit classpath for when Ant core loader != Java application loader and Path.systemClassPath taken from ${java.class.path}

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30276] New: - [PATCH] Add @since to new methods in Target

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30276] - [PATCH] Add @since to new methods in Target

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30277] New: - [PATCH] Typo in ccm.html

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30277] - [PATCH] Typo in ccm.html

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30162] - [PATCH] Avoid potential memory leaks from IntrospectionHelper.helpers

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30162] - [PATCH] Avoid potential memory leaks from IntrospectionHelper.helpers

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30162] - [PATCH] Avoid potential memory leaks from IntrospectionHelper.helpers

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu