Re: Ant 1.6.2 ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] With Eclipse 3.0 it should be easy to change Ant versions, but I think this is a good chance to get the actual Ant version into the broad mass. On a related note: the NetBeans IDE release 3.6 bundles Ant 1.6.1 but permits a different version to be selected at runtime

Re: Ant 1.6.2 ?

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25345 >> >>> jspc tag broken with new version of jasper 4 votes >>>(one of many to Tomcat5) > > > so what do we do hear. We could pull the -v option, but there is the > risk of man

Re: Ant 1.6.2 ?

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I will be happy to make this release of course. Great. 8-) So let's all walk through Bugzilla and assign bugs we want to see fixed in 1.6.2 to ourselves and mark them as targeted in 1.6.2. There is no point in saying we want

RE: Ant 1.6.2 ?

> > I propose > > 1. we fix > > 2. we tell people in the docs to use the tomcat own task if they > > encounter trouble. > > Sounds like a plan. Maybe we should encourage them to use Tomcat's > task even if they don't have any problems with ours? Yes, according to "use the vendors tasks"-rule

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10413] - enhancement: JUnit task only creates one forked VM per batch

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Jan's bugzilla list for 1.6.2 (was Re: Ant 1.6.2 ?)

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14255 Jar task > does not generate INDEX.LST considering entries in MANIFEST's > classpath Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefan Bodewig) 5 votes Non-trivial. I'm not sure whether I'l

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24697] - The JUnit plugin forks once for each test suite

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: tests failing w/ illegal access error

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone else seen this? Something like this in strange classloader setups. Are you forking ? Are parts of Ant or build/classes or build/testcases on your CLASSPATH? You get a method like this when a class tries to invoke a protect

Re: JVM Security properties

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you think a value of "" will get through? Even if it does (I think it does), we'll get an equals sign on the command line. or even explicit support for it (?) would be better IMHO. Stefan -

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtils.java

bodewig 2004/04/21 00:12:29 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtils.java Log: One not too much Revision ChangesPath 1.67 +2 -2 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/FileUtils.java Index: FileUtils.java ==

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch Locator.java

bodewig 2004/04/21 00:18:49 Modified:.WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch Locator.java Log: don't depend on jre being lowercase, PR: 25798 Revision ChangesPath 1.593 +3 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW ==

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch Locator.java

bodewig 2004/04/21 00:19:13 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH Locator.java Log: merge Revision ChangesPath No revision No revis

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25798] - Locator.java can't find tools.jar if jre installation is in uppercase-letters

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27532] - Ant isn't looking for tools.jar in the right directory.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25798] - Locator.java can't find tools.jar if jre installation is in uppercase-letters

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Container|Composite]Mapper

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to go ahead and merge it to the 1.6 branch... +1 > before that happens we should hopefully resolve any > conflict regarding the name of it... I personally am > glad enough to have it under any name... so any > conflict is (so

Re: [Container|Composite]Mapper

Hi Matt, The names used for the typedefs "globmapper" etc are ok to be used in a global context - i.e. it is obvious that they are mapper types, so they do not need to restrict the name to a FileMapper context. So my feeling (now) is that should be in ant 1.6.2. As regards the name, I used "contain

Re: [Container|Composite]Mapper

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to go ahead and merge it to the 1.6 branch... +1 before that happens we should hopefully resolve any conflict regarding the name of it... I personally am glad enough to have it under any name... so

Re: Ant 1.6.2 ?

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25345 jspc tag broken with new version of jasper 4 votes (one of many to Tomcat5) so what do we do hear. We could pull the -v option, but there is the risk of ma

Re: tests failing w/ illegal access error

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone else seen this? Something like this in strange classloader setups. Are you forking ? Are parts of Ant or build/classes or build/testcases on your CLASSPATH? You get a method like this when a class tries t

Re: JVM Security properties

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do you think a value of "" will get through? Even if it does (I think it does), we'll get an equals sign on the command line. I think Environment.Variable demands one of the value fields to be set or even explic

Re: [Container|Composite]Mapper

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only thing to keep in mind is that the following (I think) > should still work. > > > > > > > > > as against: > > > > ... > > > Why is this desirable? Less wordy or

Re: tests failing w/ illegal access error

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is me running build.sh test or ant test from ant CVS_HEAD; > CLASSPATH is empty. or should be. I will take a look. CLASSPATH points to lib/optional/junit.jar, Sun's JDK 1.4.2_04 on RedHat 7.3 (yes, outdated, I know), no problem

Re: Ant 1.6.2 ?

Maybe the manual entry for the jspc could should how to use the task bundled with tomcat 5.0. Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I propose 1. we fix 2. we tell people in the docs to use the tomcat own task if they encounter trouble. Sounds like a plan. Maybe we should encourage them to use To

Re: tests failing w/ illegal access error

Steve Loughran wrote: This is me running build.sh test or ant test from ant CVS_HEAD; CLASSPATH is empty. or should be. I will take a look. Did you do rm -rf bootstrap build before doing ./build.sh test Peter - To unsubscribe, e-m

Re: [Container|Composite]Mapper

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The only thing to keep in mind is that the following (I think) should still work. as against: ... Why is this desirable? Less wordy or for a different re

Re: tests failing w/ illegal access error

Peter Reilly wrote: Steve Loughran wrote: This is me running build.sh test or ant test from ant CVS_HEAD; CLASSPATH is empty. or should be. I will take a look. Did you do rm -rf bootstrap build before doing ./build.sh test not the bootstrap, but I just did that and got the same result. hmmm. Ok.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13655] - proper retrncode for ant.bat

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Redirector WAS [Container|Composite]Mapper

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for bringing this up again, I have not > forgotten about it > (nor about reviewing the redirector stuff). Would you (or anyone else) like to review what's in HEAD before I merge it to the 1.6 branch? -Matt _

Re: [Container|Composite]Mapper

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ps. > Thanks for updating the doc for macrodef, esp the > text element!. Actually, that was all Jan's work. I just noticed a missing "e" on the word "attribut" and thought I'd fix it... -Matt __

Re: Redirector WAS [Container|Composite]Mapper

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would you (or anyone else) like to review what's in > HEAD before I merge it to the 1.6 branch? I don't expect to discover any un-mergeeable problems ;-) I'll by sitting in a train for at least eight hours tomorrow, my notebook is goi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28513] New: - Ant executes targets that are dependencies of other targets which are not selected because of an "if" attribute.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28514] New: - Ant 1.6.1 and weblogic 8.1 ant tasks

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3198] - The task doesn't work properly with multi-element sourceparh

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28517] New: - SCP task fails when invoked multiple times.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3808] - making interfaces that projects implements.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4066] - Ant task and classpath

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

Re: [Container|Composite]Mapper

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But on reflection, it may be better to use the element > in this case, inside an implicit aka So we seem to agree. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4066] - Ant task and classpath

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28513] - Ant executes targets that are dependencies of other targets which are not selected because of an "if" attribute.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4066] - Ant task and classpath

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28518] New: - War files have lower case for WEB-INF path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28518] - War files have lower case for WEB-INF path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

timestamp checking

I am thinking we can and should factor out all timestamp checking into one place, like FileUtils and FileSet. 1. lots of code (JarSigner, uptodate) dont use the file system granularity at all when checking file ages. recommendation: some method boolean FileUtils.IsUpTodate(source,dest,granulari

Re: timestamp checking

--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am thinking we can and should factor out all > timestamp checking into > one place, like FileUtils and FileSet. +1 > > Incidentally, on that granularity discussion > yesterday. There is a > platform independent way to determine this: > exper

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28517] - SCP task fails when invoked multiple times.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu