Incorrect documentation of FTP task

I see that someone has tried to incorporate my suggestion for using the latest commons-net.jar in order to use ant's task with NT-based servers. However, the documentation is not quite correct. It says: "To use the FTP task with Microsoft FTP servers, you need CVS HEAD of commons-net and jak

optional jars

Can someone please clarify the optional jar requirement for ant >= 1.6? The manual says in one place that you must build ant with the library dependencies present, and in another place (Installing ant-Optional Tasks) it states that you can simply drop the dependency jar into ant's lib directory

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26993] New: - copy task with two filtersets produces "Infinite loop in tokens"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26993] - copy task with two filtersets produces "Infinite loop in tokens"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26993] - copy task with two filtersets produces "Infinite loop in tokens"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26993] - copy task with two filtersets produces "Infinite loop in tokens"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26993] - copy task with two filtersets produces "Infinite loop in tokens"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: optional jars

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:25:06 -0600, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can someone please clarify the optional jar requirement for ant >= 1.6? The manual says in one place that you must build ant with the library dependencies present, and in another place (Installing ant-Optional Tasks) it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26993] - copy task with recursive assignments produces "Infinite loop in tokens"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Ant 1.7

>> do you have any pointers concerning JCR, I do not find a link for it on >> java.sun.com. first of all, there's the specification home page itself: http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=170 (as you can see, quite an impressive and huge expert group is involved. Apache Group is involved as well...)

Re: Ant 1.7

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do not know if we will make some further releases of ant 1.6. My > guess is that there might be from time to time the need for a > release due to "environmental factors", ... [SNIP] Or just a very bad bug. > In any case I

Re: Ant 1.7

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is it currently possible to use a type as its own class if > available, then adapt if possible instead? I'm not sure I follow you here. My guess is that the answer is no, could be yes, though. 8-) > One of the first things I had con

Re: Incorrect documentation of FTP task

Steve Cohen wrote: I see that someone has tried to incorporate my suggestion for using the latest commons-net.jar in order to use ant's task with NT-based servers. It was me. O:-) However, the documentation is not quite correct. It says: "To use the FTP task with Microsoft FTP servers, you

Re: Ant 1.7

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Coenen Consult-smi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Remy Maucherat seems to be the person at Apache who supported the > JSR API and worked on integrating it with Slide but if I'm not > mistaken, he moved over to the JBOSS crew. Remy works for the JBoss Group and is a member of th

RE: Ant 1.7

> In any case I am starting to think about ant 1.7 and further. > > Here are the points which spring to my mind : > > 1) local properties, > 2) roles, > 3) get the xdocs proposal out, The xdocs proposal is also on my interest-list (but that´s a very long one - to long for the time, like everybo

Re: notes on embedding ANT

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Paul F. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) I had to duplicate much of the functionality of the Main.runBuild > method. We are aware of this to a certain degree, do you have any concrete ideas on refactoring it? > 4) It would be nice if org.apache.tools.ant.helper.Proje

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks ftp.html

antoine 2004/02/16 23:59:36 Modified:docs/manual install.html docs/manual/OptionalTasks ftp.html Log: Fix information concerning library requirements for ftp task. jakarta-oro 2.0.1 or greater commons-net 1.2.0 or greater when using MS FTP servers Revision Ch

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks ftp.html

antoine 2004/02/17 00:02:19 Modified:docs/manual Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH install.html docs/manual/OptionalTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH ftp.html Log: Merge from HEAD Try to give better explanations concerning the library requirements for ftp task Revision ChangesPa

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks get.html cvs.html

antoine 2004/02/17 00:31:40 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks get.html cvs.html Log: Remove comparison between cvs update and HTTP get from corresponding ant tasks reference Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +0 -4 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/get.html Index: get.html

Re: Ant 1.7

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In any case I am starting to think about ant 1.7 and further. Here are the points which spring to my mind : 1) local properties, 2) roles, 3) get the xdocs proposal out, The xdocs proposal is also on my interest-list (but that´s a very long one - to long for the time, lik

RE: Ant 1.7

> I think forrest is good for static site generation; I am > getting ready > to move my work project (smartfrog.org) to it from msword. > Because you > can plug in other transforms, we could have xdoclet generate > source XML > from the docs, and then use forrest to turn it into the > site/p

Re: roles, restricted types

See inline for comments. However on thinking about this (naming problem, namespace issues, types etc) I realized that one could use the antlib scheme to solve the problem: For example: I used the new package for conditions to allow consistence: org.apache.t

Re: Ant 1.7

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Or, an antlib could register its own tasks to override the default tasks (is that possible today?). You can replace tasks with your own, yes. I'm not sure whether you can do so for any namespace, but at le

Re: Ant 1.7

Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Hi, I do not know if we will make some further releases of ant 1.6. My guess is that there might be from time to time the need for a release due to "environmental factors", such as the release of a new version of an operating system forcing us to adapt the famous Os c

Re: Ant 1.7

Peter Reilly wrote: 3) get the xdocs proposal out, 4) think about virtual file system abstractions, and do something about them, This sounds like fun.., but may be difficult to achieve in the same timeframe as local properties and roles. you are right the time frame for these points could exten

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] New: - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

invoking targets with subant

does subant run/defines/whatever the top level properties of the invoked buildfile: I have a subant that call "test0" on dir1/build.xml, that target depends on properties defined at the top level in that same buildfile, but when it is invoked with subant it fails because the top level propertie

Re: invoking targets with subant

forget it, my fault, I wrote a task that invokes junittask, and forgot to add the propertyset. :) MAriano Mariano Benitez wrote: does subant run/defines/whatever the top level properties of the invoked buildfile: I have a subant that call "test0" on dir1/build.xml, that target depends on prop

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SubAnt.java

peterreilly2004/02/17 07:41:05 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SubAnt.java Log: subant: catch throwables from ant.execute() with failonerror is false PR: 27007 Reported by: Mariano Benitez Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +8 -0 ant/src/main/org/apa

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SubAnt.java

peterreilly2004/02/17 07:45:00 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH SubAnt.java Log: sync with HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.9.2.5 +8 -0 ant/src/main

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

peterreilly2004/02/17 07:48:03 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW Log: update WHATSNEW - subant haalt on failure Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.503.2.42 +2 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW =

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

peterreilly2004/02/17 07:48:17 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: update WHATSNEW - subant haalt on failure Revision ChangesPath 1.545 +2 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW === RCS file: /home/cvs

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Ant 1.7

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > My personal pet features that are quite high on my TODO list: > > * DynamicConfiguratorNS > > * task input/output features - I really need to write down the > proposal. Basically[1]. > > * unification of our File collection types in some way

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Incorrect documentation of FTP task

> From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > While it is true that the CVS HEAD of commons-net is required and while it > is > true that jakarta-oro is required (jakarta-oro is now required for any > uses > of the ftp task using commons-net), I don't believe it is true that 2.0.8 > of > oro i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

+1, it makes things very much clear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27014] New: - failureproperty parameter in JUnit task does not work when testcase fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

REGRESSION: Ant 1.6+ doesn't detect duplicate targets

C:\oss\org_apache\antx>C:\pro\ant1.5.1\bin\ant -f duplicate-target.xml Buildfile: duplicate-target.xml BUILD FAILED Duplicate target: `twice' Total time: 1 second C:\oss\org_apache\antx>C:\pro\ant1.5.2\bin\ant -f duplicate-target.xml Buildfile: duplicate-target.xml BUILD FAILED Duplicate target:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27007] - subant task fails even if failonerror="false"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu