DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25378] New: - Added batch limit to the SCP task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25378] - Added batch limit to the SCP task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25378] - Added batch limit to the SCP task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25379] New: - Cvs Tasks doesn't handle wildcards, so why not add a fileset

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25379] - Cvs Tasks doesn't handle wildcards, so why not add a fileset

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25380] New: - Unzip task doesnt overwrite destination when file listing is root

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25380] - Unzip task doesnt overwrite destination when file listing is root

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: bug fixes!! WAS: ant 1.6beta3 released

ok, I submitted the fixes, use them as seems appropriate, I ignored the FTP task, since it seems undecided on how you want to handle this. Filip -Original Message- From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:00 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: RE: bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25379] - Cvs Tasks doesn't handle wildcards, so why not add a fileset

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25380] - Unzip task doesnt overwrite destination when file listing is root

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: xdoclet and the generated html files

Disregard my previous e-mail on this. I have figured out the problems I had. However, looking at the generated files, for subant and whichresource, a new (needed) column has been added for attributes - whether they are required or not. How does one specify this and how does one specify that one o

AW: xdoclet and the generated html files

Hi Peter, I think there is a tag @ant.attribute.group name="groupname" description="this is my group of attributes" to define a group of attributes and @ant.attribute group="groupname" Look at Property.java for instance I guess that @ant.attribute.group is optional, in the case that one needs a l

RE: xdoclet and the generated html files

> Disregard my previous e-mail on this. I have figured out the problems > I had. However, looking at the generated files, for subant and > whichresource, > a new (needed) column has been added for attributes - whether they are > required or not. How does one specify this and how does one specify

Re: AW: xdoclet and the generated html files

Thanks Antoine, I will get the fixed up pages ready soon. Peter Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Hi Peter, I think there is a tag @ant.attribute.group name="groupname" description="this is my group of attributes" to define a group of attributes and @ant.attribute group="groupname" Look at Property.java

Re: xdoclet and the generated html files

Thanks Jan. As Antoine pointed out, the feature is implemented. ( use of @ant.attribute.group) and there is examples in the code base. I will look at the threads. Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Disregard my previous e-mail on this. I have figured out the problems I had. However, looking at the ge

Ant-contrib for ANT1.6

Hi, I have found a couple of issues with ANT-Contrib. I know, it is a separate project, but I thought people here should be aware of it. (I have filed bugs on antcontrib's site) 1) The compile with walls task, only works in JDK1.4. Even worst, you can only compile ANTContrib with JDK1.4. This is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25390] New: - cvschangelog output - put and inside

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

XML task

Hello folks, i wonder if ant has a task to edit XML files, has it? Can someone show me this or those tasks? Regards, Edson

RE: XML task

Try the xml tasks :-) http://ant.apache.org/external.html#xmltask Jan > -Original Message- > From: Edson Alves Pereira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 2:34 PM > To: 'Ant Developers List' > Subject: XML task > > > Hello folks, i wonder if ant has a ta

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25394] New: - OutofMemory when running lots of

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: xdoclet and the generated html files

I am following this thread. I'm glad Peter got past his original issue. I don't have much bandwidth at the moment to spend on this, but will help as I can. On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, at 04:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:\ @ant.internal=true Internal setters not to be documented in the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25398] New: - macrodef broken: attribute values aren't being set

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25398] - macrodef broken: attribute values aren't being set

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

ANT1.6 much more slower than 1.5

OK, here are some more issues. I am running the my main build in ANT 1.6 vs 1.5 and I am getting very disapointing numbers: On ANT1.5 a full build takes 9m23s On ANT1.6b3 the same build takes 14m12s (!) On ANT1.6b3 a modified version of the build takes 11m3s This is after modifying the bui

AW: ANT1.6 much more slower than 1.5

Hi Jose, what you are saying is that is slower in ant1.6 than in ant1.5, and that you can fix the problem partly by moving to macrodef. The question is : what made antcall slower in 1.6 The one change I remember is : Allow references to be properly inherited via antcall Bugzilla Report 21724.

Re: AW: ANT1.6 much more slower than 1.5

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi Jose, what you are saying is that is slower in ant1.6 than in ant1.5, and that you can fix the problem partly by moving to macrodef. The question is : what made antcall slower in 1.6 The one change I remember is : Allow references to be properly inherited via antcall

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24493] - VSS bad reference: srssafe.ini does not exist. It IS srcsafe.ini

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

AW: AW: ANT1.6 much more slower than 1.5

Hi, A workaround for people migrating from ant 1.5 to ant 1.6 and wanting to keep antcall is to set inheritrefs to false. I have found the diffs for the fix which I checked in on July 22nd. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=105887513827839&w=2 Is this improvable for performance ? Is this

Re: AW: AW: ANT1.6 much more slower than 1.5

Hi Antoine, Sorry my e-mail was not very clear. The problem is not the inheritance of references. It is the use of references. In ant 1.5: Hello world does not cause the fileset to be evaluated. In ant 1.6 the fileset is evaluated, (calling DirectoryScanner.scan()) even if it is not used due

AW: AW: AW: ANT1.6 much more slower than 1.5

Hi Peter, thanks for the clarification. I remember that Costin and Dominique were discussing about ways to spare on the logging side of ant. The problem is that you cannot know for sure if there is no logger or listener which is interested in debug type events. Could we decide that such costly