DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24024] New: - Definer could load all antlibs matching a resource path

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23987] - scp task doesn't complain if remote directory is not specified

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23987] - scp task doesn't complain if remote directory is not specified

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22904] - [Patch] to download some third party libraries (not complete)

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread cmanolache
I agree that doesn't work well with and some other use cases. I'm +1 on if we can keep it separated from , so the behavior of doesn't change. I think it may be a good idea to even throw an exception if some name is used with both local and property. I wouldn't mind even a that is local + mod

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about we make the sshexec timeouts seconds instead of ms? We are inconsistent with the timeout attribute between different tasks. , , and use milliseconds, uses seconds. I understand that some people may migrate from to a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24024] - Definer could load all antlibs matching a resource path

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: XML, XSL, and Ant

2003-10-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Kyle Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) only applies to source XML document - if there are > entities/dtds in the stylesheet, these can't be resolved by > . Confirmed on Ant 1.5.3/Xalan 2.2, D11/Xerces 2.3.0 > and Ant 1.6, B2/Xalan 2.5.1/Xerces 2.5.0/10-22-2003 snapshot o

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional TraXLiaison.java

2003-10-23 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/10/23 01:43:22 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional TraXLiaison.java Log: Register xmlcatalog as entity resolver for the stylesheet as well Revision ChangesPath 1.31 +9 -8 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/an

cvs commit: ant/xdocs external.xml

2003-10-23 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/10/23 02:01:30 Modified:docs external.html xdocsexternal.xml Log: Add pointer to ImTask, Submitted by Jon Madison Revision ChangesPath 1.143 +48 -0 ant/docs/external.html Index: external.html =

cvs commit: ant/xdocs external.xml

2003-10-23 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/10/23 02:02:24 Modified:docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH external.html xdocsTag: ANT_16_BRANCH external.xml Log: Merge from HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.136.2.1 +48 -0 ant/docs/e

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net TelnetTask.java

2003-10-23 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/10/23 02:06:43 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net TelnetTask.java Log: Better support for people debugging timed out reads in , Submitted by Larry Shatzer Revision ChangesPath 1.21 +3 -1 ant/src/ma

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net TelnetTask.java

2003-10-23 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/10/23 02:07:46 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH TelnetTask.java Log: Merge from HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.20.2.1 +3 -1

Re: [patch] Telnet task

2003-10-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
committed, thanks Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

new external task

2003-10-23 Thread Duverger, Patrick
> hello > > this mail is to add a new external ant task: > > <> > > Description: > > Kanaputs is a parser for java based scripting. It is an interpreter for > Java. With Kanaputs you can use Java as an interpreted language: no more > compilation, each instruction is executed when y

RE: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On 22 Oct 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I haven't made up my mind on the feature itself > > OK, re-reading the description first, I don't like the > > , > | The value part of is optional, and the local > proper

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23862] - Cannot use overriden TestCase.getName() method in task

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23987] - scp task doesn't complain if remote directory is not specified

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23960] - add catalog resolver to

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 23 Oct 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In this case, we would change the build.xml again to say > encoding="US-ASCII" rather drop the encoding attribute IMHO. > and remove all accentuated characters from the sources. replace them with Unicode escapes. Stefan

milliseconds versus seconds[was: Vote: for 1.6]

2003-10-23 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
milliseconds are simply more powerful. In telnet the timeout is defined as an integer, so it not possible to say timeout="0.002" for 2 milliseconds. Even if it were possible, it would be a problem because of locales (ie the build file writer would have to wonder whether he should write timeout="0.0

RE: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
Ok, I think I will try to go back to the drawing board and try to provide my simple definition of as I originally proposed. I guess I did not look close enough your implementation. >From your example bellow I see that does not define a proper nesting context (which I think is wrong). In my origi

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 22 October 2003 15:04, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> What is the benefit of making adhere to the scoping set >> up by ? > > The point is that all tasks including see the local > properties as normal properties. So it is sup

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I cannot see what is the real situation that you were referring to, > when would you be in a case where you "find a task and > will have to search all possible scopes for a local" what are all > these possible scopes. Can yo

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread peter reilly
On Thursday 23 October 2003 11:09, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > Ok, I think I will try to go back to the drawing board and try > to provide my simple definition of as I originally > proposed. I guess I did not look close enough your implementation. > > From your example bellow I see that does

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread peter reilly
On Thursday 23 October 2003 12:31, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 22 October 2003 15:04, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> What is the benefit of making adhere to the scoping set > >> up by ? > > > > The point is that all tasks includ

RE: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I cannot see what is the real situation that you were referring to, > > when would you be in a case where you "find a > task and will > > have to search all po

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One example would be the way lisp does things. > > (let ((here (point)) > (ignore-depth 0) > (tag-info context)) > bla.. bla.. > ) At least Emacs Lisp uses dynamic extent here, i.e. with (setq here bar) (let

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 23 October 2003 12:31, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> I haven't checked, but does you current implementation allow >> to shadow use properties? IMHO it shouldn't. > > It does shadow user properties. The reason is to support >

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> If you have several nested s, you'd have to check each level >> for a that was in place shadowing your global value. > > But this is no more or less shadowing than me maki

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread peter reilly
On Thursday 23 October 2003 13:44, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> If you have several nested s, you'd have to check each level > >> for a that was in place shadowing yo

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread peter reilly
On Thursday 23 October 2003 13:39, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 23 October 2003 12:31, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> I haven't checked, but does you current implementation allow > >> to shadow use properties? IMHO it shouldn't.

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following does the same .. > > > > > > It doesn't - if build.sysclasspath is a user property of course. Try it with ant -Dbuild.sysclasspath=only and you'll see. Stefan --

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread peter reilly
Hi Costin, The idea is to make local properties appear like normal properties. Using something like "local:foo" to designate local properties could be possible, however one whould need to handle scoping issues like: ? new local here ? local:x is ${local:x} local:y is

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread peter reilly
On Thursday 23 October 2003 14:09, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The following does the same .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't - if build.sysclasspath is a user property of course. Try > it with ant -Dbui

Re: AW: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread peter reilly
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 08:41, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: > I am OK for the third beta. > In the third beta we should have : > - the properties, > - a new xml-apis.jar (probably the one which is distributed with > Xerces-Java 2.5) > - can we also have the endorsed libraries ? > - other point

RE: AW: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wednesday 22 October 2003 08:41, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: > > I am OK for the third beta. > > In the third beta we should have : > > - the properties, > > - a new xml-apis.jar (probably the one which is distributed with > > Xerces-Java 2.5)

RE: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thursday 23 October 2003 13:44, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez > > > > This is my point. The should be visible for both or for none. > > > > > You have a compelling example here > > > > > > > > ${p

Re: AW: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread peter reilly
On Thursday 23 October 2003 15:16, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Wednesday 22 October 2003 08:41, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: > > > I am OK for the third beta. > > > In the third beta we should have : > > > - the properties, > > > - a new xml

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-23 Thread peter reilly
On Thursday 23 October 2003 15:42, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > Notice that following this path (not making locals visible) means > that defined tasks will behave differently than java written > tasks, more over it means that macrodef is not really the same as having > the code in place. Ex: Y

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24058] New: - task is documented as (without 'c' at the end)

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24059] New: - [PATCH] Minor edits to docs

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: XML, XSL, and Ant

2003-10-23 Thread Kyle Adams
> We should be able to change this if SAXSource is supported, I'll take > a stab at it - but I will need testers before I'm willing to merge my > changes into the 1.6 branch. If I'd send you a changed ant-trax.jar, > could you test it in your Ant 1.6beta environment? No problem - I've got a simpl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24059] - [PATCH] Minor edits to docs

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24060] New: - [PATCH] Typo in subant.html

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24060] - [PATCH] Typo in subant.html

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24061] New: - does not work well with a big number of source files.

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24062] New: - does not look as other tasks - it does not supported nested fileset(s)

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: XML, XSL, and Ant

2003-10-23 Thread Robert Koberg
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Kyle Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > We should be able to change this if SAXSource is supported, I'll take > > a stab at it - but I will need testers before I'm wil

Re: cvs commit: ant/xdocs external.xml

2003-10-23 Thread Steve Loughran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + + +ImTask is a task to allow one to send an Instant +Message. Currently supports yahoo!, AIM, and Jabber Oh, this is cool. We run a jabber net here and now maybe we can get cruise control to send hate messages. This will work well for peopl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24058] - task is documented as (without 'c' at the end)

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24061] - does not work well with a big number of source files.

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24061] - does not work well with a big number of source files.

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: XML, XSL, and Ant

2003-10-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Robert Koberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Otherwise, I believe you would need to run the Transformer resolved > Sources through an XMLReader or XMLFilter that has an EntityResolver > set. We are passing a SAXSource to the Transformer that has been created by an XMLReader wit

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24061] - does not work well with a big number of source files.

2003-10-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 23 Oct 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but here is a problem related to the C# side of things; I dont think > mono handles the @file inclusion of long commands, so we run a risk > of breaking things there. [EMAIL PROTECTED] jsps]$ mcs --help Mono C# compiler, (C) 2001 - 2003 Ximian, Inc. mc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24067] New: - [PATCH] should not touch a file it will not change semantically

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24067] - [PATCH] should not touch a file it will not change semantically

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24069] New: - [PATCH] Email addr change

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24069] - [PATCH] Email addr change

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24070] New: - [PATCH] Debugging tweaks for ApacheCatalogResolver

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24070] - [PATCH] Debugging tweaks for ApacheCatalogResolver

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: XML, XSL, and Ant

2003-10-23 Thread J.Pietschmann
Stefan Bodewig wrote: My JDK 1.4 javadocs ... contradicts itself when it comes to document(). I have no idea how it is implemented in Xalan. Yeah, a famous discrepancy. The question is whether the Transformer inherits the URIResolver from the factory or whether it is created with the default one.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24074] New: - [PATCH] Bogus URL in zipfileset.html

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24074] - [PATCH] Bogus URL in zipfileset.html

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8031] - [PATCH] Suggest ProjectHelperImpl use File.toURI().toURL().toExternalForm()

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8031] - [PATCH] Suggest ProjectHelperImpl use File.toURI().toURL().toExternalForm()

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23920] - Contains selector test fails on JDK 1.2.2 and IBM JDK 1.4.1

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24024] - Definer could load all antlibs matching a resource path

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23987] - scp task doesn't complain if remote directory is not specified

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8031] - [PATCH] Suggest ProjectHelperImpl use File.toURI().toURL().toExternalForm()

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24024] - [PATCH] Definer could load all antlibs matching a resource path

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24024] - [PATCH] Definer could load all antlibs matching a resource path

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24083] New: - Properties issue

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24083] - Properties issue

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3968] - Need way to have ejbjar task continue when errors occur

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug