DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22428] - PATCH - option to run tasks inside a loop

2003-10-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22428] - PATCH - option to run tasks inside a loop

2003-10-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs MacroInstance.java

2003-10-08 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2003/10/08 01:44:46 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs MacroInstance.java Log: upgrade protected access to public for setMacroDef for macroinstance object Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/MacroIn

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs MacroInstance.java

2003-10-08 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2003/10/08 01:46:48 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH MacroInstance.java Log: upgrade protected access to public for setMacroDef for macroinstance object Revision ChangesPath No revision

Can´t understand message

2003-10-08 Thread Jan . Materne
When using -debug a message is printed when properties are set. E.g. Setting ro project property: ant.version -> Apache Ant version 1... ^^ What should the "ro" mean? oata.PropertyHelper.setUserProperty():line 406 public synchronized void setUserProperty(String ns, String name,

AW: Can´t understand message

2003-10-08 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
ro means probably readonly. Antoine -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2003 14:03 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Can´t understand message When using -debug a message is printed when properties are set. E.g. Setting

Re: Can´t understand message

2003-10-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What should the "ro" mean? "read only" Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Can´t understand message

2003-10-08 Thread Adam Hardy
read-only? On 10/08/2003 02:02 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When using -debug a message is printed when properties are set. E.g. Setting ro project property: ant.version -> Apache Ant version 1... ^^ What should the "ro" mean? oata.PropertyHelper.setUserProperty():line 406 public syn

Re: Can´t understand message

2003-10-08 Thread Phil Weighill-Smith
"Read-only"? On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 13:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > When using -debug a message is printed when properties are set. > E.g. > > Setting ro project property: ant.version -> Apache Ant version 1... > ^^ > > What should the "ro" mean? > > > oata.PropertyHelper.setUser

RE: Can´t understand message

2003-10-08 Thread Jan . Materne
ok, but all properties are "read-only". So why - delete that characters or - write that out? Jan > -Original Message- > From: Phil Weighill-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 2:05 PM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: Can´t understand message > >

Re: Can´t understand message

2003-10-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok, but all properties are "read-only". Not true. setProperty will overwrite properties, but not the ones set via setUserProperty (where the message comes from). setNewProperty won't overwrite an existing property, but they are writab

RE: Can´t understand message

2003-10-08 Thread Jan . Materne
> > ok, but all properties are "read-only". > > Not true. setProperty will overwrite properties, but not the ones set > via setUserProperty (where the message comes from). setNewProperty > won't overwrite an existing property, but they are writable in > general. > > Stefan So I think writing

RE: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-08 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
Would it be easier for you to change antcontrib so it ships as an ANTLIB, and then just get an agreement on ANT shipping a binary distribution? There would be no copyright involved in that case (since we are talking about binaries). With that the only detail in ANTCORE would be whether we try to

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual develop.html

2003-10-08 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2003/10/08 06:29:55 Modified:docs/manual develop.html Log: attempt to describe the new add introspection rules Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +103 -1ant/docs/manual/develop.html Index: develop.html

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual develop.html

2003-10-08 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2003/10/08 06:33:24 Modified:docs/manual Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH develop.html Log: attempt to describe the new add introspection rules Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.13.2.1 +103 -1ant/docs/manual/develop.h

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23679] New: - support for preservelastmodified in fixcrlf task

2003-10-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23679] - support for preservelastmodified in fixcrlf task

2003-10-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23649] - Requirement for a method to not make entries in the xml reports.

2003-10-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23649] - Requirement for a method to not make entries in the xml reports.

2003-10-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Questions: A Cocoon Ant task

2003-10-08 Thread Upayavira
I am attempting to craft an Ant task for Apache Cocoon's command line interface. Cocoon's CLI can be configured with an XML xconf file. I want to move this configuration information into the Ant build script itself. Is there any way I can share the code to interpret this XML configuration info

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-08 Thread Gus Heck
I'm not as eager to see the tasks in Ant proper as others, that's why I haven't taken any initiative here (in Apache speak, that's the difference between my +0 and the +1s that have been cast by others). Are we talking about all ant-contrib tasks or just try/catch? I thought just try/catch...

RE: Questions: A Cocoon Ant task

2003-10-08 Thread Dominique Devienne
You can use DynamicConfigurator to intercept attribute/elements, and build the DOM tree yourself, which you can then feed to Cocoon's CLI I guess. The code below should get you a leg up. Provided with no warranties whatsoever ;-) I wrote this a long time ago, on a weekend, with little Ant experien

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23686] New: - doesn't work well with interactive programs

2003-10-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23688] New: - Provide a method to get the ant logging level for the log4j appender

2003-10-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

dev@ant.apache.org

2003-10-08 Thread Shatzer, Larry
With the beta for 1.6 I get this when using a javascript