RE: antidote diff

2003-09-16 Thread Jan . Materne
Puh! - I´m not the one who did the mistake :-) Jan > -Original Message- > From: Jack Woehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 6:40 PM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: antidote diff > > > peter reilly wrote: > > > if the -d is missing, cvs does not chec

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional dotnet.xml

2003-09-16 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/09/16 01:29:08 Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks propertyfile.html src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional dotnet.xml Log: 2003 Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks/propertyfile.html Index: propertyfile.html

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition ConditionBase.java Equals.java

2003-09-16 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2003/09/16 02:08:57 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Copy.java Filter.java FixCRLF.java Get.java Input.java Jar.java Java.java Javac.java Javadoc.java Jikes.java JikesOutputParser.java KeySu

Re: [PATCH] Next round of typo fixes

2003-09-16 Thread peter reilly
Committed, Peter. On Monday 15 September 2003 23:32, Shatzer, Larry wrote: > More typos and misspellings... > > -- Larry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23150] - [Patch] JUnitTask does not mark timed out tests as failed when forked

2003-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23160] - [PATCH] JUnit, no summary for timeout testcases.

2003-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23165] - javadoc task should allow multiple "link" parameters

2003-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20578] - STCheckout - it would be nice to be able to check out against timestamps

2003-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util DateUtils.java

2003-09-16 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/09/16 03:38:14 Modified:.WHATSNEW docs/manual/OptionalTasks starteam.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/starteam StarTeamCheckout.java StarTeamList.java TreeBasedTask.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20578] - STCheckout - it would be nice to be able to check out against timestamps

2003-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23191] New: - need brief, specific documentation on including custom tasks in deployed apps

2003-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23191] - need brief, specific documentation on including custom tasks in deployed apps

2003-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23191] - need brief, specific documentation on including custom tasks in deployed apps

2003-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23191] - need brief, specific documentation on including custom tasks in deployed apps

2003-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [PATCH] Next round of typo fixes

2003-09-16 Thread Shatzer, Larry
Thanks, here is the next set. src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/UnPackageNameMapper.java still has messed up line endings. -- Larry > -Original Message- > From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 2:11 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: [P

Re: [PATCH] Next round of typo fixes

2003-09-16 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Hi, nice work, though this set seems to contain a wrong correction (prefixed with ) Kind Regards, Martijn Shatzer, Larry wrote: Thanks, here is the next set. src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/UnPackageNameMapper.java still has messed up line endings. -- Larry -Original Message- From

RE: [PATCH] Next round of typo fixes

2003-09-16 Thread Shatzer, Larry
Ooops. Thanks. I usually read the sentence for double words twice to make sure it made sense, this must have slipped past me. I think the sentence might be changed to: "Timestamps are not at all looked at." to avoid the double word. New patch to supercede previous patch with this change to correc

Re: [PATCH] Next round of typo fixes

2003-09-16 Thread Jack J. Woehr
"Shatzer, Larry" wrote: > Ooops. Thanks. I usually read the sentence for double words twice to make > sure it made sense, this must have slipped past me. > > I think the sentence might be changed to: "Timestamps are not at all looked > at." to avoid the double word. Ah, the problem of perfective

[NOT PATCH] Possible new optional task for file modification

2003-09-16 Thread phil.weighill-smith
(Sorry if this doesn't follow the standard "patch" way of doing things. I'm new to this Open Source experience!) Please find attached a submission for consideration as an additional optional Ant (1.5.x+) task. The Javadoc describes what it does, but as a summary: The task allows a (common) fil