Re: AW: Change proposal for FTP task

If you have additional questions you can email me off list. The line between S390 an USS (Unix system services) is fuzzy at best, the bottom line is everything in S390 and USS is EBCDIC. So no you cannot use binary to upload/download text. The FTP client command asc or with the ant FTP binary

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23049] New: - OutOfMemoryError on Solaris

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

> -Original Message- > From: Gump Integration Build [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant > > > > This email is autogenerated from the output f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23049] - OutOfMemoryError on Solaris

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 08 Sep 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FYI: a recent change (few weeks back?) is breaking Axis in its iterative build (uses a descendent of ant-contrib's foreach) fails as it cannot find SOAPStruct and in fact a find xml-axis -name \*SOAPStruct.class

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

On Tue, 09 Sep 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> OK, I've found a SOAPStruct.java in interop3/groupE. > >> Could it be that your compilation depends on the order of the files >> in a fileset? > > Anything is possible, but I think maybe some other change w/ > classloading, vms, o

Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > During development of StyleTest.testNewStylesheet() I got this > error, too. The xsl stylesheet wasn´t right. Maybe GUMP has not > used the latest version. It still failed last night on my machine. The CommanlineJavaTest fails as ant

RE: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 9:25 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant > > > On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > During development of StyleTest.tes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23029] - ant:current broken if within

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

so far I haven't found anything too helpful while trying to debug the situation, but ... On Tue, 09 Sep 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dims says: > > one more data point (nagoya, jdk13, ant-nightly): > "ant -f buildSamples.xml compile" (FAILS - compiles same build.xml > many t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23058] New: - element "todir" for task "signjar"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks junit.html

bodewig 2003/09/10 03:00:14 Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks junit.html Log: apos is not an HTML 4 entity, found by Larry Shatzer Revision ChangesPath 1.30 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks/junit.html Index: junit.html

Re: antidote diff

On Tue, 09 Sep 2003, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I posted this on user@ ... maybe not the right place. True, development stuff (including patches) should be on the dev list. > Trivial antidote diff that clears up 7 of 15 javadoc warnings during > build. Will be committed in a few

cvs commit: ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/xml/dtd ANTDocumentType.java

bodewig 2003/09/10 03:08:22 Modified:src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/core AppContext.java src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/event BuildEventType.java src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/modules/console LogLevelEnum.java

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

On 10 Sep 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll try to get Gump into using 1.5.4 next, to see whether it really > is a problem with a recent change in Ant. At least it gets past the compilation - it is running the tests know which is known to take ages 8-) Next is a line by line

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntlibTest.java

peterreilly2003/09/10 03:37:14 Modified:src/etc/testcases/taskdefs antlib.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant ComponentHelper.java UnknownElement.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/helper ProjectHelper2.java src/main/org/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23029] - ant:current broken if within

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Antlib.java

peterreilly2003/09/10 03:55:58 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Antlib.java Log: Antlib: set location before maybeConfigure as maybeConfigure could throw an exception (invalid element/attribute for example) Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +1 -1

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

On Mon, 08 Sep 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI: a recent change (few weeks back?) is breaking Axis in its > iterative build (uses a descendent of ant-contrib's foreach) I think I've tracked this down, finally. target compileJunit in buildTest contains a task that under the

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

On 10 Sep 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ant 1.5.x will use the last one to finally set the property Not really true. Even 1.5.4 uses the first definition if you use multiple tags in Ant. I'd say the Axis build works with Ant 1.5.x by accident (I'll soon commit a version tha

additional ant option: -p: | -projecthelp:

Whith larger buildfiles you´ll get a lot of output if you choose -projecthelp, especially if you work with included buildfiles (e.g. check.xml). I´ve implemented a small "filter". You can write "-p:filter" and only targets are listed with a "filter" in their names. Should I commit that? Jan

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

On 10 Sep 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (I'll soon commit a version that should make Axis happy for the next > - i.e. tomorrow's - Gump run). I could use some help here. The Axis build works if I back out Peter's change for Ant.java's revision 1.84 - and I don't have a good g

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

Sorry for coming back contardicting my previous mails again. On 10 Sep 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd say the Axis build works with Ant 1.5.x by accident It relies on a bug that has been fixed[1]. > (I'll soon commit a version that should make Axis happy for the next > -

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

On Wednesday 10 September 2003 13:28, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 10 Sep 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (I'll soon commit a version that should make Axis happy for the next > > - i.e. tomorrow's - Gump run). > > I could use some help here. > > The Axis build works if I back out

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java

bodewig 2003/09/10 06:17:00 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java Log: It is legal to omit the target attribute in , don't die with a NPE Revision ChangesPath 1.88 +17 -10ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Ant.java Index: Ant.java

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java

This reminds me of another bug I forgot to report. If is called without setting target, the default target is called. If there is no default target, the "" target is called. This means that the top-level tasks are called twice. Example: hello.xml Hello world build.xml ... The solutio

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntTest.java

peterreilly2003/09/10 06:57:20 Modified:src/etc/testcases/taskdefs ant.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntTest.java Added: src/etc/testcases/taskdefs ant.topleveltest.xml Log: Change

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The solution is not to execute the target if > the target is "". I agree. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did not really understand the original code, I think setProject has initially been package private so recreating the Property tasks from the new project has been the only option then. > The code is a bit strange, it would have been

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

On Wednesday 10 September 2003 15:40, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I did not really understand the original code, > > I think setProject has initially been package private so recreating > the Property tasks from the new project has been th

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should I roll back the change? Not for me, I think this fixes a bug (but may be worth a note in the "could break your build" section). Others? Stefan - To unsubscr

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional TraXLiaison.java

conor 2003/09/10 08:18:41 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTProcess.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional TraXLiaison.java Added: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTLiaison2.java Log: Refactor T

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11103] - Style task hardcodes reference to TraXLiaison class

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/selectors MappingSelector.java

conor 2003/09/10 08:29:25 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types AbstractFileSet.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/optional/image Scale.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/selectors MappingS

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs StyleTest.java

conor 2003/09/10 08:29:52 Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs StyleTest.java Log: typo - sort of Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +1 -1 ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/StyleTest.java Index: StyleTest.java =

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs StyleTest.java

On 10 Sep 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > typo - sort of > - * TestCases fuer

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTLiaison2.java

peterreilly2003/09/10 08:44:01 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTLiaison2.java Log: Another typo! Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/XSLTLiaison2.java Index: XSLTLiaison2.java

Re: antidote diff

Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Trivial antidote diff that clears up 7 of 15 javadoc warnings during > > build. > > Will be committed in a few seconds, thanks Well, thank you. Will continue to wander through the source in my spare moments. I grasp Antidote, not sure how far I can go, though since the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23070] New: - Delete task can't delete a directory based on a name pattern

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23070] - Delete task can't delete a directory based on a name pattern

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23035] - javac always recompiles when multiple src paths are given

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23035] - javac always recompiles when multiple src paths are given

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23040] - Socket condition on Waitfor task does not close socket

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23035] - javac always recompiles when multiple src paths are given

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23035] - javac always recompiles when multiple src paths are given

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23035] - javac always recompiles when multiple src paths are given

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition Socket.java

antoine 2003/09/10 11:20:46 Modified:.WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition Socket.java Log: close the socket created by the socket condition I have tested the issue. With the new code, within approximatively 100 milliseconds, the socke

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23040] - Socket condition on Waitfor task does not close socket

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23035] - javac always recompiles when multiple src paths are given

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23037] - enhancement of org.apache.tools.ant.types.selectors.ContainsRegexpSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23037] - enhancement of org.apache.tools.ant.types.selectors.ContainsRegexpSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23037] - enhancement of org.apache.tools.ant.types.selectors.ContainsRegexpSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: antidote diff

Hi, This cvs diff should fix the remaining javadoc warnings in antidote. LP. --- "Jack J. Woehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi -- > > I posted this on user@ ... maybe not the right place. > > Trivial antidote diff that clears up 7 of 15 javadoc warnings > during build. > > Let me know if th

Re: GUMP failure caused by ANT (Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis)

Stefan, Can you please explain why on WIN2K, both 1.5.X and CVS HEAD both work fine? (and we see the failure only on nagoya?). If this was the problem, then we'd see failures on both platforms. Thanks, -- dims --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for coming back contardicting

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTLiaison2.java

On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 01:44 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > peterreilly2003/09/10 08:44:01 > > Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTLiaison2.java > Log: > Another typo! > Hmm. Seems I can't spell my own name. :-) Thanks Conor -