DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19343] New: - PropertyFile - property value wrapping option

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Antlib descriptor

So we add this then. I am not closed to progress and change but let start small. Jose Alberto > -Original Message- > From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 25 April 2003 20:10 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Antlib descriptor > > > Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3198] - The task doesn't work properly with multi-element sourceparh

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19350] New: - Lower and Upper case

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] CVS: xjavadoc build.xml,1.49,1.50

On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 15:04, Erik Hatcher wrote: > Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xjavadoc > In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv27780 > > Modified Files: > build.xml > Log Message: > Fix for Gump. XJD-21 > > Index: build.xml > ===

Roles (was: antlib)

Hi I want to start a new thread to discuss specifically the concept of Roles (as they were conceived in the ANTLIB proposal) Costin has suggested we take this separately and whatever it comes of it will be supported at that time by the antlibs, of course. So here are my points on what roles are fo

Re: Antlib descriptor

(Boy, you fall behind a couple of days on your email and suddenly an avalanche breaks loose) At 10:39 AM 4/25/2003 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote: However I'm more convinced than ever that the XML should use a subset of ant, and reuse the same processing infrastructure. I.e. not another parser or

Re: Roles (was: antlib)

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > What does it all mean? It means we can now write a task, well typed, which > can be accept different XML subelements depending on the declarations of > other objects present on the build. The vendor specific elements of > , and others are typical examples of where