Re: JBuilder & Gel IDE Integration

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Paul King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GEL IDE for Windows License: Freeware Isn't very specific and the site doesn't seem to give more details. I've downloaded the latest RC to see whether there are more license details but the setup.exe doesn't do any g

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18352] New: - The filename and path of the build file that failed is printed out in URL encode format.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Cygwin tester needed

Ok - I've installed 1.5.3b1 and replaced the wrapper script by HEAD. Install dir: C:\apache-ant-1.5.3Beta1 Test 1: ln -s /cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.5.3Beta1/bin/ant /usr/local/bin/ant without modification: ANT_HOME=/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.5.3Beta1 with modification: expr: warning: unportable BRE:

Re: Request for downloadable Ant Manual in pdf Thank you

On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am sure we could probably do a PDF build from the xdocs stuff now, I'm sure, too. > if we somehow create docbook content via XSLT, velocity, whatever. Why docbook? You could create the XSL:FO directly, no? > >Please note that

Re: Cygwin tester needed

On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Stefan Moebius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > warning: unportable BRE: `^/.*': using `^' as the first character of > the basic regular expression is not portable; That's funny. The GNU man pages of expr(1) are a bit vague here (they talk about "anchored" expressions in context

Re: [patch] [bugfix] IntrospectionHelper.java

Stefan Bodewig :: On Sat, 01 Mar 2003, Neeme Praks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: storeElement() method silently returns, if the tag does not support the specified element. This is because storeElement can never be called without calling createElement before that from within Ant. It may be different f

FixCrLf extension

Hi All I'm currently cleaning up a huge repository of source files which have all kinds of line endings. So I had a look at the FixCrLf task. Although FixCrLf basically does what I'm looking for I need some more features: a) checkout all the files with a wrong line ending b) fix them c) check them

Re: [patch] [bugfix] IntrospectionHelper.java

On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Neeme Praks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig :: >> On Sat, 01 Mar 2003, Neeme Praks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>storeElement() method silently returns, if the tag does not support >>>the specified element. >> >> This is because storeElement can never be called w

Re: [patch] [bugfix] IntrospectionHelper.java

On 26 Mar 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm going to throw in the extra check in CVS HEAD later > today/tomorrow. I spoke too soon. Given the javadocs: * Stores a named nested element using a storage method determined * by the initial introspection. If no appropria

Artima SuiteRunner Task

Hi All, (Please forgive my newbie-ness). I have developed an Ant Task for the Artima SuiteRunner and I'd like to submit it. Perhaps a Committer might a respond directly and I'll e-mail them a zip file containing the code? (Didn't want to send a zip file to a few hundred people...!) Thanks, Adam

[GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Build results exceed maximum length. Please see URL above for details. Last 50 li

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18363] New: - jythonc task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Hi, Myself and Leigh Ishikawa ("Adding 'setName' support to the xmljunitresultformatter.java") have not received any response to our contributions. Can someone please advise? Cheers, Adam -Original Message- From: Adam Duffy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 March 2003 11:09 To: Ant Deve

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Could someone please explain me what SuiteRunner brings to the table that JUnit doesn't I've looked at it quite a bit, and maybe beside better reporting, I don't see anything compelling about it compared to JUnit, and even loose the built-in assert methods of TestCase (thru Assert)... I'd be i

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Hi Dominique, I would like to know what other people think too. If at the end of the day, the developers of Ant do not wish to use the code I have written, that is fine with me. I only want to contribute to the development of Ant - which I am really fond of. As does Leigh Ishikawa. Any advice on

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Sorry, I didn't mean at all to put down your contribution. I was more asking an off topic question about SuiteRunner. My personal opinion on SuiteRunner is not binding in any way the Ant community at large, or the committers ;-) As a note, past comments indicate that Task should ideally live withi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18363] - jythonc task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8080] - New task to compile Python code in java bytecode

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/unix Symlink.java

bodewig 2003/03/26 07:50:28 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/unix Symlink.java Log: Fix javadocs. PR: 17143 Submitted by: Gus Heck Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +7 -7 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

As Dominique mentioned, what the Ant developers typically try to do these days is push back on 3rd party integration built into Ant and let these custom tasks live with the project they support. It would be easier for maintenance for us committers, since none of (probably) use Artima SuiteRunn

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Thanks Dominique, I wasn't aware of that policy regarding 'external' tasks (since I only started subscribing recently). I'll ask Artima.com to see if their interested. :) Thanks again, Adam -Original Message- From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 March 2003 15:37 To

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Adam Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Myself and Leigh Ishikawa ("Adding 'setName' support to the > xmljunitresultformatter.java") have not received any response to our > contributions. Can someone please advise? First advice would be to be more patient, four hours isn't th

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

That said (by Erik and myself), if SuiteRunner becomes popular enough (like JUnit), and even though it's an 'external' task, there would be a good possibility that it could be incorporated in ant-optional.jar, simply to help and evangelize Unit Testing in general, which is a best practice. That s

Re: Ant task and dirset/fileset

Hmm I notice that the source is marked as experimental and subject to change. Is this still true? To what extent. I am slightly leary of upgrading to an alpha branch for our builds, particularly if the compelling feature is going to be a moving target :) Also in your example buildfile, I am not

RE: Ant task and dirset/fileset

is stand alone (not the very latest version with the dependency stuff), i.e. a single Java file. The version integrated to Ant removes the magic of inferring the target to call from the current target (which is why you thought all the targets do the same thing... They all call a different target n

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That said (one more ;-), if Ant ever comes up with an easier way to > integrate third party tasks Easier than ? Almost impossible. Stefan

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Hu, not totally. If the AntLib also uses types, you need another , which should also probably needs a loaderref. Since you now use twice the classpath, if needs to be outside and refid'd. And what about the task? I'd like to not have setup my classpath outside of Ant and build.xml, and avoid

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

I meant ANT_HOME/lib. --DD -Original Message- From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:37 AM To: 'Ant Developers List' Subject: RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task Hu, not totally. If the AntLib also uses types, you need another , which should als

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Unless the tasks require changes to core ant :-)~ Peter. On Wednesday 26 March 2003 16:26, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That said (one more ;-), if Ant ever comes up with an easier way to > > integrate third party tasks > > Ea

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hu, not totally. Did I forget to put that smiley in? > Since you now use twice the classpath, if needs to be outside and > refid'd. No, you'll need to use the loaderref attribute. > And what about the task? Easy in Ant

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Regarding suiterunner vs JUnit, I prefer the suiterunner API: test methods can throw Exceptions, also assertion failures generate Exceptions so you can put one catch(Exception) at the bottom of your method and print out any useful info before throwing the exception on, rather than separa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17408] - 6 New ClearCase Tasks Created

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 11:46 AM, Nathaniel Spurling wrote: Regarding suiterunner vs JUnit, I prefer the suiterunner API: test methods can throw Exceptions, also assertion failures generate Exceptions so you can put one catch(Exception) at the bottom of your method and print out a

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

> -Original Message- > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:55 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task > and in Ant support if/unless properties > and I always > have it set up to be able to run a single tes

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

I do it with one line in my build.xml: and a small change to the batchtest task: Both of these in are my "test" target, so I just run ant with ant -Dtestcase=com.whatever.TestWhatever test Easy! And thanks to Erik's book for the tip. s -Original Message- From: Chris Reeves [mailto:[E

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 12:01 PM, Chris Reeves wrote: Erik - How do you set it up to run a single test on demand? Like this: http://www.ehatchersolutions.com/JavaDevWithAnt/junit.html

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Ah - ok. And proof that no matter how tattered the pages of my copy of JDWA are, there's more gems to be found within. Thanks! Chris > -Original Message- > From: Steven Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:05 PM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: RE:

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 11:46 AM, Nathaniel Spurling wrote: > > Regarding suiterunner vs JUnit, I prefer the suiterunner API: > > test methods can throw Exceptions, also assertion failures > generate Exceptions so you can put one catch(Exception) at the bottom > o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16455] - Ant should not require DTD file listed in DOCTYPE to exist

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

I don't buy that. If your exception doesn't contain enough info, then modify the exception. I never trap exception in Unit tests, unless I'm expecting it to be thrown and fail() if it doesn't. As far as running one of more tests, I use a -Dtestcase=com/acme/SomeTest.class, and testcases defaultsto

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Dominique Devienne wrote: > Hu, not totally. If the AntLib also uses types, you need another > , which should also probably needs a loaderref. Since you now use > twice the classpath, if needs to be outside and refid'd. In ant1.6 the difference between tasks and types is very small. It would

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks subant.html whichresource.html

stevel 2003/03/26 09:55:37 Added: docs/manual/CoreTasks subant.html whichresource.html Log: manual insertion of xdocs pages Revision ChangesPath 1.1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/subant.html Index: subant.html ===

Re: Request for downloadable Ant Manual in pdf Thank you

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am sure we could probably do a PDF build from the xdocs stuff now, I'm sure, too. if we somehow create docbook content via XSLT, velocity, whatever. Why docbook? You could create the XSL:FO directly, no? I s

RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Dominique Devienne wrote: > Hu, not totally. If the AntLib also uses types, you need another > , which should also probably needs a loaderref. Since you now use > twice the classpath, if needs to be outside and refid'd. > > And what about the task? I'd like to not have setup my classpath >

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Chris Reeves wrote: Ah - ok. And proof that no matter how tattered the pages of my copy of JDWA are, there's more gems to be found within. Thanks! Chris I believe that particular snippet is a near-direct cut and paste from ant's own build file. So the credit goes to whoever set up the task in

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Costin Manolache wrote, On 26/03/2003 18.46: Dominique Devienne wrote: Hu, not totally. If the AntLib also uses types, you need another , which should also probably needs a loaderref. Since you now use twice the classpath, if needs to be outside and refid'd. In ant1.6 the difference between t

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

I would include filters, mappers, conditions and selectors to the list. A relatively simple mod to the core ant makes this possible (bugzilla 17199) basically get ConditionBase.java, AbstractFileSet, FilterChain implement DynamicConfigurator. and get UnknownElement (bugzilla 18312) call setProject

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18166] - Concat enhancement

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18312] - [PATCH] New tokenfilter for filterchain

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18312] - [PATCH] New tokenfilter for filterchain

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18312] - [PATCH] New tokenfilter for filterchain

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18312] - [PATCH] New tokenfilter for filterchain

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

peter reilly wrote: > I would include filters, mappers, conditions and selectors to > the list. I would exclude them :-) Taks, types, mappers, filters, whatever are just ant components - and they shouldn't need a special syntax from user perspective. We shouldn't treat them ( or types, tasks )

Ant extension points (was RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task)

After much head scratching, I came up with a solution to my own little Ant extension problem (about which I complained about a few months back). Basically, I first had to use Parametrizable to enable the extension point, like other Ant types: The solution was the introduct

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18391] New: - RFE: ignoreMissingBuildFiles option for subant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18391] - RFE: ignoreMissingBuildFiles option for subant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18391] - RFE: ignoreMissingBuildFiles option for subant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [patch] [bugfix] IntrospectionHelper.java

ok, fair enough. I sent a patch to commons-dev with a workaround for Jelly anyway... just have to check back now if the patch was actually noticed or not ;-) Stefan Bodewig :: On 26 Mar 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm going to throw in the extra check in CVS HEAD later today

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18391] - RFE: ignoreMissingBuildFiles option for subant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18391] - RFE: ignoreMissingBuildFiles option for subant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18391] - RFE: ignoreMissingBuildFiles option for subant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18391] - RFE: ignoreMissingBuildFiles option for subant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18391] - RFE: ignoreMissingBuildFiles option for subant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

URGENT: problem installing Ant

Hi! I'm doing a project with Postgresql and I need to use JDBC. I've got a problem installing ant (I use SUSE). When I try to execute ant is trhown this exeption: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/tools/ant/Main my PATH: echo $PATH >/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/loca