Jesse Glick wrote:
> On 05/14/2010 06:28 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
>> Then on the day of the release, I did another svn switch to trunk.
>
> I guess I'm confused then.
The aim of the procedure was to have the announcement of the release
checked in in trunk in advance, because this is part of
On 05/14/2010 06:28 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Then on the day of the release, I did another svn switch to trunk.
I guess I'm confused then.
We could also use the ANT_SITE branch permanently
That would make sense to me. Of course you would only need to branch xdocs, not
the rest of th
Hello Jesse,
in fact, the ANT_SITE branch is a branch which contains all the source
code of ant-core. I created it to handle the period between the build of
ant 1.8.1 and the actual release.
I svn switched to ANT_SITE /www/ant.apache.org on people.apache.org
after having committed changes announc
As I understand it, xdocs/ is now being maintained on the ANT_SITE branch, rather than being tied to a product branch. If so, shouldn't this directory be deleted from the
Subversion trunk, to avoid any possible confusion?
-
To
