Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
Steve Loughran wrote:
Why is the onerror default of typedef "fail" and not "failall"?
The effect is that a typedef like this
will warn but not fail if the property file is missing. Surely a
missing declaration file is important enough that the
default sho
> Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> > Why is the onerror default of typedef "fail" and not "failall"?
> >
> > The effect is that a typedef like this
> > > uri="antlib:com.puppycrawl.checkstyle"
> > />
> >
> > will warn but not fail if the property file is missing. Surely a
> > missi
Steve Loughran wrote:
Why is the onerror default of typedef "fail" and not "failall"?
It was for BC reasons.
i.e. this is the behaviour for 1.5 when resource was used.
Peter
The effect is that a typedef like this
will warn but not fail if the property file is missing. Surely a
missi
Why is the onerror default of typedef "fail" and not "failall"?
The effect is that a typedef like this
will warn but not fail if the property file is missing. Surely a missing
declaration file is important enough that the default should be "fail
the build right now".
proposal
-we chang
