Re: test failures in gump

2011-03-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-03-02, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > On top of that I tried to make sense of the error message of > replacetokens-test.xml (below) but I do not get it ... > Regards, > Antoine > au:antunit] Build File: > /srv/gump/public/workspace/ant/src/tests/antunit/filters/replacetokens-test.xml >

test failures in gump

2011-03-01 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi, I just worked on import-url-test.xml and junit-outputtoformatters-test.xml. I see some other tests which neeed fixing : - replacetokens-test.xml - native2ascii-test.xml - rmic-test.xml Seen the current time, I am not going to fix them tonight. On top of that I tried to make sense of the er

Re: Ant test failures in gump

2011-03-01 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
On 3/1/2011 3:49 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2011-03-01, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: OK I have done "something". Thank you. I have tweaked a few things and am just running the full testsuite on my windows box where problems with undeleteable jars tend to show up. Thanks too. I have seen t

Re: Ant test failures in gump

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-03-01, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > OK I have done "something". Thank you. I have tweaked a few things and am just running the full testsuite on my windows box where problems with undeleteable jars tend to show up. > I have seen that the java resources like ${java:foo!foo.properties} i

Re: Ant test failures in gump

2011-02-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
OK I have done "something". for taskdef-test.xml I have added 5 properties test1.jar to test5.jar which correspond to work entries in gump. I have seen that the java resources like ${java:foo!foo.properties} in replacetokens-test.xml do not lend themselves to standardisation. I wanted to replace

Re: Ant test failures in gump

2011-02-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
On 2/28/11 11:02 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2011-02-28, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > >> I see now that in fact there are still 21 antunit tests failing in gump >> (see [1] and [2] below) : >> Do we want to add a work entry in gump metadata for each of the >> directories where these tests creat

Re: Ant test failures in gump

2011-02-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-02-28, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > I see now that in fact there are still 21 antunit tests failing in gump > (see [1] and [2] below) : > Do we want to add a work entry in gump metadata for each of the > directories where these tests create classes or resources ? > Or do we want to someh

Ant test failures in gump

2011-02-27 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Stefan, I see now that in fact there are still 21 antunit tests failing in gump (see [1] and [2] below) : Do we want to add a work entry in gump metadata for each of the directories where these tests create classes or resources ? Or do we want to somehow standardize and have a convention th