Re: problems with logging (message priority level)

2003-12-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we should change the priority in this case to warning. +1 > This is of course not backward compatible. So we have to document it. Stefan - To unsubscribe,

Re: problems with logging (message priority level)

2003-12-15 Thread Peter Reilly
This problem came up before in a different context (but I forgot to follow it up). The logging for stderr is set to priority error unless the task is run in a different jvm, in which case it is at level warning. This is inconsistent and it would appear to be incorrect to set the priority to "error"