Re: per-task diagnostics

2007-02-20 Thread Steve Loughran
Jeffrey E Care wrote: I know I'm a little late to this party - I've been tied up in my new assignment. Anyway, FWIW here's my opinion: I've been thinking about how we could improve our diagnostics, by moving more of the diags into tasks themselves. Every task could have a diagnostics(PrintS

Re: per-task diagnostics

2007-02-20 Thread Jeffrey E Care
I know I'm a little late to this party - I've been tied up in my new assignment. Anyway, FWIW here's my opinion: > I've been thinking about how we could improve our diagnostics, by moving > more of the diags into tasks themselves. Every task could have a > diagnostics(PrintStream) method that

Re: per-task diagnostics

2007-02-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been thinking about how we could improve our diagnostics, by > moving more of the diags into tasks themselves. Every task could > have a diagnostics(PrintStream) method that would be called to do > the diags. I think it should

AW: per-task diagnostics

2007-02-12 Thread Jan.Materne
>I've been thinking about how we could improve our diagnostics, >by moving >more of the diags into tasks themselves. Every task could have a >diagnostics(PrintStream) method that would be called to do the diags. > >With this the -diagnostics routine could run through all tasks that it >knows ab

per-task diagnostics

2007-02-07 Thread Steve Loughran
I've been thinking about how we could improve our diagnostics, by moving more of the diags into tasks themselves. Every task could have a diagnostics(PrintStream) method that would be called to do the diags. With this the -diagnostics routine could run through all tasks that it knows about,